通过弥散加权磁共振成像评估头颈部癌症患者放疗期间和放疗后的腮腺功能

IF 1.7 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Ahmad Ameri , Shaghayegh Hassas Yeganeh , Saeed Nasiri , Zahra Azizmohammadi , Mojtaba Ansari , Ainaz Sourati , Manijeh Beigi
{"title":"通过弥散加权磁共振成像评估头颈部癌症患者放疗期间和放疗后的腮腺功能","authors":"Ahmad Ameri ,&nbsp;Shaghayegh Hassas Yeganeh ,&nbsp;Saeed Nasiri ,&nbsp;Zahra Azizmohammadi ,&nbsp;Mojtaba Ansari ,&nbsp;Ainaz Sourati ,&nbsp;Manijeh Beigi","doi":"10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) variation in irradiated parotid glands during and after 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This study enrolled 15 head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who were treated with 3DCRT underwent diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) at rest and after gustatory stimulation in three time points as follows: before, during (one day after receiving the mean dose 26 Gy) and 6 months after the end of radiotherapy (RT). Salivary Ejection Fraction (SEF) data was also obtained from salivary gland scintigraphy (SGS) at the same three time points as MRI. Mean ADC at rest and after stimulation (ADC<sub>r</sub>, ADC<sub>s</sub>) and SEF were extracted from parotid region for three time points. Finally, SEF and changes of ADC over time at rest and after stimulation and in each time point were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Difference between mean ADC<sub>r</sub> before RT and during RT was not significant (<em>p</em> = 0.12). The ADC<sub>r</sub> values were significantly higher after RT than before RT (<em>p</em> = 0.003) and during RT (after dose 26 Gy) (<em>p</em> = 0.001). The difference between ADC<sub>r</sub> and ADC<sub>s</sub> in each time point showed that there is significant difference between ADC<sub>r</sub> and ADC<sub>s</sub> before RT (<em>p</em> = 0.005). Difference between these parameters after RT was also significant (<em>p</em> = 0.05). Non-significant difference (<em>p</em> = 0.21) between ADC<sub>r</sub> and ADC<sub>s</sub> during RT was observed. The result of SEF also was significantly lower after RT than during (<em>p</em> = 0.008) and before RT (<em>p</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Mean ADC values could be used as a surrogate marker to characterize the parotid function in different stages of RT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","volume":"17 4","pages":"Article 101094"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850724002784/pdfft?md5=619635c414afab88af4bb85eeac65ea2&pid=1-s2.0-S1687850724002784-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing parotid gland function through diffusion weighted MRI during and post-radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Ameri ,&nbsp;Shaghayegh Hassas Yeganeh ,&nbsp;Saeed Nasiri ,&nbsp;Zahra Azizmohammadi ,&nbsp;Mojtaba Ansari ,&nbsp;Ainaz Sourati ,&nbsp;Manijeh Beigi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) variation in irradiated parotid glands during and after 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This study enrolled 15 head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who were treated with 3DCRT underwent diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) at rest and after gustatory stimulation in three time points as follows: before, during (one day after receiving the mean dose 26 Gy) and 6 months after the end of radiotherapy (RT). Salivary Ejection Fraction (SEF) data was also obtained from salivary gland scintigraphy (SGS) at the same three time points as MRI. Mean ADC at rest and after stimulation (ADC<sub>r</sub>, ADC<sub>s</sub>) and SEF were extracted from parotid region for three time points. Finally, SEF and changes of ADC over time at rest and after stimulation and in each time point were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Difference between mean ADC<sub>r</sub> before RT and during RT was not significant (<em>p</em> = 0.12). The ADC<sub>r</sub> values were significantly higher after RT than before RT (<em>p</em> = 0.003) and during RT (after dose 26 Gy) (<em>p</em> = 0.001). The difference between ADC<sub>r</sub> and ADC<sub>s</sub> in each time point showed that there is significant difference between ADC<sub>r</sub> and ADC<sub>s</sub> before RT (<em>p</em> = 0.005). Difference between these parameters after RT was also significant (<em>p</em> = 0.05). Non-significant difference (<em>p</em> = 0.21) between ADC<sub>r</sub> and ADC<sub>s</sub> during RT was observed. The result of SEF also was significantly lower after RT than during (<em>p</em> = 0.008) and before RT (<em>p</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Mean ADC values could be used as a surrogate marker to characterize the parotid function in different stages of RT.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101094\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850724002784/pdfft?md5=619635c414afab88af4bb85eeac65ea2&pid=1-s2.0-S1687850724002784-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850724002784\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850724002784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估三维适形放疗(3DCRT)期间和之后辐照腮腺表观弥散系数(ADC)变化的有用性。材料和方法本研究纳入了 15 名接受 3DCRT 治疗的头颈部癌症(HNC)患者,他们分别在放疗(RT)前、放疗期间(接受平均剂量 26 Gy 后一天)和放疗(RT)结束后 6 个月的三个时间点接受了静息状态下和味觉刺激后的弥散加权成像(DWI)。唾液腺射血分数(SEF)数据也是在与核磁共振成像相同的三个时间点通过唾液腺闪烁成像(SGS)获得的。提取腮腺区域在三个时间点的静息时和刺激后的平均 ADC(ADCr、ADCs)和 SEF。最后,比较静息时和刺激后以及每个时间点的 SEF 和 ADC 随时间的变化。RT 后的 ADCr 值明显高于 RT 前(p = 0.003)和 RT 期间(剂量 26 Gy 后)(p = 0.001)。各时间点的 ADCr 和 ADCs 之间的差异表明,RT 前的 ADCr 和 ADCs 之间存在明显差异(p = 0.005)。RT 后这些参数之间的差异也很明显(p = 0.05)。在 RT 期间,ADCr 和 ADCs 之间的差异不明显(p = 0.21)。结论 ADC 平均值可作为替代标记物来描述 RT 不同阶段的腮腺功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing parotid gland function through diffusion weighted MRI during and post-radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) variation in irradiated parotid glands during and after 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT).

Materials and methods

This study enrolled 15 head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who were treated with 3DCRT underwent diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) at rest and after gustatory stimulation in three time points as follows: before, during (one day after receiving the mean dose 26 Gy) and 6 months after the end of radiotherapy (RT). Salivary Ejection Fraction (SEF) data was also obtained from salivary gland scintigraphy (SGS) at the same three time points as MRI. Mean ADC at rest and after stimulation (ADCr, ADCs) and SEF were extracted from parotid region for three time points. Finally, SEF and changes of ADC over time at rest and after stimulation and in each time point were compared.

Results

Difference between mean ADCr before RT and during RT was not significant (p = 0.12). The ADCr values were significantly higher after RT than before RT (p = 0.003) and during RT (after dose 26 Gy) (p = 0.001). The difference between ADCr and ADCs in each time point showed that there is significant difference between ADCr and ADCs before RT (p = 0.005). Difference between these parameters after RT was also significant (p = 0.05). Non-significant difference (p = 0.21) between ADCr and ADCs during RT was observed. The result of SEF also was significantly lower after RT than during (p = 0.008) and before RT (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Mean ADC values could be used as a surrogate marker to characterize the parotid function in different stages of RT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and applications of nuclear, radiation and isotopes in biology, medicine, drugs, biochemistry, microbiology, agriculture, entomology, food technology, chemistry, physics, solid states, engineering, environmental and applied sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信