{"title":"评估企业零净过渡途径可信度的经济基础","authors":"Keith Jin Deng Chan, Bon Cheung, Louis Yue Shen","doi":"10.1002/bse.3951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The G20 has highlighted the urgency and importance of financing net zero transition. Investors, however, lack a systematic framework to assess the credibility (incentive‐compatibility) of corporate transition claims. As such, negative screening based on current GHG emissions or even sectors remains a dominant climate investment strategy. In response, this paper develops an economic foundation for credible corporate net zero transition. Our model shows that, besides its current emissions, both a firm's transition capacity and urgency should be considered when assessing its likelihood of attaining net zero; interestingly, it shows how the concavity of its transition pathway may serve as a litmus test. Finally, we discuss how the Task Force on Climate‐Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework can be utilized for credibility assessment of corporate transition pathways. Our findings and recommendations are one of the first attempts to address the market call for systematic approaches to evaluate forward‐looking climate mitigation claims.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An economic foundation for assessing the credibility of corporate net zero transition pathways\",\"authors\":\"Keith Jin Deng Chan, Bon Cheung, Louis Yue Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bse.3951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The G20 has highlighted the urgency and importance of financing net zero transition. Investors, however, lack a systematic framework to assess the credibility (incentive‐compatibility) of corporate transition claims. As such, negative screening based on current GHG emissions or even sectors remains a dominant climate investment strategy. In response, this paper develops an economic foundation for credible corporate net zero transition. Our model shows that, besides its current emissions, both a firm's transition capacity and urgency should be considered when assessing its likelihood of attaining net zero; interestingly, it shows how the concavity of its transition pathway may serve as a litmus test. Finally, we discuss how the Task Force on Climate‐Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework can be utilized for credibility assessment of corporate transition pathways. Our findings and recommendations are one of the first attempts to address the market call for systematic approaches to evaluate forward‐looking climate mitigation claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3951\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3951","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
An economic foundation for assessing the credibility of corporate net zero transition pathways
The G20 has highlighted the urgency and importance of financing net zero transition. Investors, however, lack a systematic framework to assess the credibility (incentive‐compatibility) of corporate transition claims. As such, negative screening based on current GHG emissions or even sectors remains a dominant climate investment strategy. In response, this paper develops an economic foundation for credible corporate net zero transition. Our model shows that, besides its current emissions, both a firm's transition capacity and urgency should be considered when assessing its likelihood of attaining net zero; interestingly, it shows how the concavity of its transition pathway may serve as a litmus test. Finally, we discuss how the Task Force on Climate‐Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework can be utilized for credibility assessment of corporate transition pathways. Our findings and recommendations are one of the first attempts to address the market call for systematic approaches to evaluate forward‐looking climate mitigation claims.
期刊介绍:
Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.