全科医生对全国初级保健数字决策支持系统的用户体验。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241271816
Jekaterina Šteinmiller, Peeter Ross
{"title":"全科医生对全国初级保健数字决策支持系统的用户体验。","authors":"Jekaterina Šteinmiller, Peeter Ross","doi":"10.1177/20552076241271816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study is to describe the user experiences of a nationwide digital decision support system (DDSS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>DDSSs have the potential to improve the quality and safety of healthcare services by supporting clinical decision-making with evidence-based recommendations. Due to a lack of knowledge, it is difficult to assess whether DDSSs are fulfilling their purpose. In Estonia, a nationwide DDSS for general practitioners (GPs) was implemented in 2020. To understand the impact of DDSS on the quality of care in the Estonian context and meet the demands of healthcare, it is necessary to gather information about the experiences of the users. This is the first study that examines the experiences of GPs on the use of DDSS nationwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted based on snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were performed in February-March 2022 with nine GPs. Data were analyzed by thematic analysis. A total of six themes and 16 subthemes emerged from the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six themes and 16 subthemes emerged from the data. The following themes were identified: user-friendliness, DDSS use in clinical practice, benefits of the DDSS, and the impact of the DDSS on GPs' work, barriers to using the DDSS, and suggestions for improving the user experience. The results of the study are important, as they address and contribute to the relevant aspects of digital health in primary care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs shared their individual user experiences, including user-perceived barriers and enabling factors that influence the implementation and use of a decision support system in primary care settings. It is revealed that GPs have different benefits and barriers depending on the topic discussed. Future research should evaluate the functioning of the DDSS and the quality of the decisions it provides by observing and evaluating patient records. Systematic user experiences need to be collected and examined to ensure the usability and sustainability of the DDSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General practitioners' user experience of the nationwide digital decision support system in primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Jekaterina Šteinmiller, Peeter Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076241271816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study is to describe the user experiences of a nationwide digital decision support system (DDSS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>DDSSs have the potential to improve the quality and safety of healthcare services by supporting clinical decision-making with evidence-based recommendations. Due to a lack of knowledge, it is difficult to assess whether DDSSs are fulfilling their purpose. In Estonia, a nationwide DDSS for general practitioners (GPs) was implemented in 2020. To understand the impact of DDSS on the quality of care in the Estonian context and meet the demands of healthcare, it is necessary to gather information about the experiences of the users. This is the first study that examines the experiences of GPs on the use of DDSS nationwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted based on snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were performed in February-March 2022 with nine GPs. Data were analyzed by thematic analysis. A total of six themes and 16 subthemes emerged from the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six themes and 16 subthemes emerged from the data. The following themes were identified: user-friendliness, DDSS use in clinical practice, benefits of the DDSS, and the impact of the DDSS on GPs' work, barriers to using the DDSS, and suggestions for improving the user experience. The results of the study are important, as they address and contribute to the relevant aspects of digital health in primary care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs shared their individual user experiences, including user-perceived barriers and enabling factors that influence the implementation and use of a decision support system in primary care settings. It is revealed that GPs have different benefits and barriers depending on the topic discussed. Future research should evaluate the functioning of the DDSS and the quality of the decisions it provides by observing and evaluating patient records. Systematic user experiences need to be collected and examined to ensure the usability and sustainability of the DDSS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378188/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241271816\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241271816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:本研究旨在描述全国性数字决策支持系统(DDSS)的用户体验:数字决策支持系统通过循证建议支持临床决策,具有提高医疗服务质量和安全性的潜力。由于缺乏相关知识,很难评估数字决策支持系统是否实现了其目的。爱沙尼亚于 2020 年在全国范围内实施了针对全科医生(GPs)的 DDSS。为了了解数据集定义系统对爱沙尼亚医疗质量的影响并满足医疗保健的需求,有必要收集有关用户体验的信息。这是首次研究全科医生在全国范围内使用 DDSS 的经验:方法:采用滚雪球抽样法进行定性描述研究。2022 年 2 月至 3 月,对 9 名全科医生进行了半结构化访谈。数据采用主题分析法进行分析。结果显示,共有 6 个主题和 16 个次主题:结果:数据中共产生了 6 个主题和 16 个次主题。确定了以下主题:用户友好性、数据收集与分析系统在临床实践中的使用、数据收集与分析系统的益处、数据收集与分析系统对全科医生工作的影响、使用数据收集与分析系统的障碍以及改善用户体验的建议。研究结果非常重要,因为它们涉及并促进了初级保健中数字健康的相关方面:全科医生分享了他们的个人用户体验,包括用户感知到的障碍以及影响初级医疗机构实施和使用决策支持系统的有利因素。研究显示,全科医生根据所讨论的主题有不同的优势和障碍。未来的研究应通过观察和评估患者记录来评估决策支持系统的功能及其所提供决策的质量。需要收集和研究系统的用户体验,以确保 DDSS 的可用性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
General practitioners' user experience of the nationwide digital decision support system in primary care.

Objectives: The aim of the study is to describe the user experiences of a nationwide digital decision support system (DDSS).

Summary of background data: DDSSs have the potential to improve the quality and safety of healthcare services by supporting clinical decision-making with evidence-based recommendations. Due to a lack of knowledge, it is difficult to assess whether DDSSs are fulfilling their purpose. In Estonia, a nationwide DDSS for general practitioners (GPs) was implemented in 2020. To understand the impact of DDSS on the quality of care in the Estonian context and meet the demands of healthcare, it is necessary to gather information about the experiences of the users. This is the first study that examines the experiences of GPs on the use of DDSS nationwide.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted based on snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were performed in February-March 2022 with nine GPs. Data were analyzed by thematic analysis. A total of six themes and 16 subthemes emerged from the data.

Results: A total of six themes and 16 subthemes emerged from the data. The following themes were identified: user-friendliness, DDSS use in clinical practice, benefits of the DDSS, and the impact of the DDSS on GPs' work, barriers to using the DDSS, and suggestions for improving the user experience. The results of the study are important, as they address and contribute to the relevant aspects of digital health in primary care.

Conclusion: GPs shared their individual user experiences, including user-perceived barriers and enabling factors that influence the implementation and use of a decision support system in primary care settings. It is revealed that GPs have different benefits and barriers depending on the topic discussed. Future research should evaluate the functioning of the DDSS and the quality of the decisions it provides by observing and evaluating patient records. Systematic user experiences need to be collected and examined to ensure the usability and sustainability of the DDSS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信