当医护人员意见不一致时：找到正确的平衡。

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL

Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.19

Yusrita Zolkefli

{"title":"当医护人员意见不一致时：找到正确的平衡。","authors":"Yusrita Zolkefli","doi":"10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Healthcare disagreements are common, but recognising the causes is essential to reaching a moral consensus. The article describes the challenges associated with resolving the disagreements. Therefore, a systematic and timely team-based discussion, ethics consultation with ethicists and the hospital ethics committee, active participation of all members' discussions, and scheduled debriefings are pragmatic ways to find balance when healthcare professionals disagree. Teams need these attempts to build consensus and make moral decisions. It also fosters harmony, prioritises patient and team interests and, most importantly, keeps the team intact.","PeriodicalId":47388,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Healthcare Professionals Disagree: Finding the Right Balance.\",\"authors\":\"Yusrita Zolkefli\",\"doi\":\"10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Healthcare disagreements are common, but recognising the causes is essential to reaching a moral consensus. The article describes the challenges associated with resolving the disagreements. Therefore, a systematic and timely team-based discussion, ethics consultation with ethicists and the hospital ethics committee, active participation of all members' discussions, and scheduled debriefings are pragmatic ways to find balance when healthcare professionals disagree. Teams need these attempts to build consensus and make moral decisions. It also fosters harmony, prioritises patient and team interests and, most importantly, keeps the team intact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗分歧很常见，但认识到分歧的原因对于达成道德共识至关重要。文章介绍了解决分歧所面临的挑战。因此，当医护人员出现分歧时，系统而及时的团队讨论、与伦理学家和医院伦理委员会进行伦理咨询、所有成员积极参与讨论以及按计划进行汇报是寻求平衡的务实方法。团队需要这些尝试来建立共识并做出道德决定。它还能促进和谐，优先考虑患者和团队的利益，最重要的是能保持团队的完整。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

When Healthcare Professionals Disagree: Finding the Right Balance.

Healthcare disagreements are common, but recognising the causes is essential to reaching a moral consensus. The article describes the challenges associated with resolving the disagreements. Therefore, a systematic and timely team-based discussion, ethics consultation with ethicists and the hospital ethics committee, active participation of all members' discussions, and scheduled debriefings are pragmatic ways to find balance when healthcare professionals disagree. Teams need these attempts to build consensus and make moral decisions. It also fosters harmony, prioritises patient and team interests and, most importantly, keeps the team intact.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

9 weeks

期刊介绍： The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access, fully online journal that is published at least six times a year. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of medical sciences including biomedical, allied health, clinical and social sciences. We accept high quality papers from basic to translational research especially from low & middle income countries, as classified by the United Nations & World Bank (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/ articles/906519), with the aim that published research will benefit back the bottom billion population from these countries. Manuscripts submitted from developed or high income countries to MJMS must contain data and information that will benefit the socio-health and bio-medical sciences of these low and middle income countries. The MJMS editorial board consists of internationally regarded clinicians and scientists from low and middle income countries.