用于术中荧光成像精确灌注评估的患者特异性动脉输入功能。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Biomedical Optics Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33306
Yue Tang, Shudong Jiang, Joseph S Sottosanti, Thomas Usherwood, Xu Cao, Logan M Bateman, Lillian A Fisher, Eric R Henderson, Ida Leah Gitajn, Jonathan Thomas Elliott
{"title":"用于术中荧光成像精确灌注评估的患者特异性动脉输入功能。","authors":"Yue Tang, Shudong Jiang, Joseph S Sottosanti, Thomas Usherwood, Xu Cao, Logan M Bateman, Lillian A Fisher, Eric R Henderson, Ida Leah Gitajn, Jonathan Thomas Elliott","doi":"10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>The arterial input function (AIF) plays a crucial role in correcting the time-dependent concentration of the contrast agent within the arterial system, accounting for variations in agent injection parameters (speed, timing, etc.) across patients. Understanding the significance of the AIF can enhance the accuracy of tissue vascular perfusion assessment through indocyanine green-based dynamic contrast-enhanced fluorescence imaging (DCE-FI).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We evaluate the impact of the AIF on perfusion assessment through DCE-FI.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>A total of 144 AIFs were acquired from 110 patients using a pulse dye densitometer. Simulation and patient intraoperative imaging were conducted to validate the significance of AIF for perfusion assessment based on kinetic parameters extracted from fluorescence images before and after AIF correction. The kinetic model accuracy was evaluated by assessing the variability of kinetic parameters using individual AIF versus population-based AIF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individual AIF can reduce the variability in kinetic parameters, and population-based AIF can potentially replace individual AIF for estimating wash-out rate ( <math> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>ep</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> ), maximum intensity ( <math> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>max</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> ), ingress slope with lower differences compared with those in estimating blood flow, volume transfer constant ( <math> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>trans</mi></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> ), and time to peak.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individual AIF can provide the most accurate perfusion assessment compared with assessment without AIF or based on population-based AIF correction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15264,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Optics","volume":"29 Suppl 3","pages":"S33306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-specific arterial input function for accurate perfusion assessment in intraoperative fluorescence imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Tang, Shudong Jiang, Joseph S Sottosanti, Thomas Usherwood, Xu Cao, Logan M Bateman, Lillian A Fisher, Eric R Henderson, Ida Leah Gitajn, Jonathan Thomas Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>The arterial input function (AIF) plays a crucial role in correcting the time-dependent concentration of the contrast agent within the arterial system, accounting for variations in agent injection parameters (speed, timing, etc.) across patients. Understanding the significance of the AIF can enhance the accuracy of tissue vascular perfusion assessment through indocyanine green-based dynamic contrast-enhanced fluorescence imaging (DCE-FI).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We evaluate the impact of the AIF on perfusion assessment through DCE-FI.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>A total of 144 AIFs were acquired from 110 patients using a pulse dye densitometer. Simulation and patient intraoperative imaging were conducted to validate the significance of AIF for perfusion assessment based on kinetic parameters extracted from fluorescence images before and after AIF correction. The kinetic model accuracy was evaluated by assessing the variability of kinetic parameters using individual AIF versus population-based AIF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individual AIF can reduce the variability in kinetic parameters, and population-based AIF can potentially replace individual AIF for estimating wash-out rate ( <math> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>ep</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> ), maximum intensity ( <math> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>max</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> ), ingress slope with lower differences compared with those in estimating blood flow, volume transfer constant ( <math> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>trans</mi></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> ), and time to peak.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individual AIF can provide the most accurate perfusion assessment compared with assessment without AIF or based on population-based AIF correction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Optics\",\"volume\":\"29 Suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"S33306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379448/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33306\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意义重大:动脉输入函数(AIF)在校正造影剂在动脉系统中随时间变化的浓度方面起着至关重要的作用,它考虑到了不同患者的造影剂注射参数(速度、时间等)的变化。目的:我们评估了 AIF 对 DCE-FI 灌注评估的影响:方法:使用脉冲染料密度计从 110 名患者身上共获取了 144 张 AIF。根据 AIF 校正前后从荧光图像中提取的动力学参数,进行了模拟和患者术中成像,以验证 AIF 对灌注评估的意义。通过评估使用个体 AIF 与基于群体 AIF 的动力学参数的变异性,评估了动力学模型的准确性:个体 AIF 可以降低动力学参数的变异性,基于群体的 AIF 有可能取代个体 AIF 估算冲洗率(k ep)、最大强度(I max)、入口斜率,与估算血流量、体积传递常数(K trans)和达到峰值的时间相比,个体 AIF 的差异较小:结论:与无 AIF 或基于人群 AIF 校正的评估相比,个体 AIF 可提供最准确的灌注评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-specific arterial input function for accurate perfusion assessment in intraoperative fluorescence imaging.

Significance: The arterial input function (AIF) plays a crucial role in correcting the time-dependent concentration of the contrast agent within the arterial system, accounting for variations in agent injection parameters (speed, timing, etc.) across patients. Understanding the significance of the AIF can enhance the accuracy of tissue vascular perfusion assessment through indocyanine green-based dynamic contrast-enhanced fluorescence imaging (DCE-FI).

Aim: We evaluate the impact of the AIF on perfusion assessment through DCE-FI.

Approach: A total of 144 AIFs were acquired from 110 patients using a pulse dye densitometer. Simulation and patient intraoperative imaging were conducted to validate the significance of AIF for perfusion assessment based on kinetic parameters extracted from fluorescence images before and after AIF correction. The kinetic model accuracy was evaluated by assessing the variability of kinetic parameters using individual AIF versus population-based AIF.

Results: Individual AIF can reduce the variability in kinetic parameters, and population-based AIF can potentially replace individual AIF for estimating wash-out rate ( k ep ), maximum intensity ( I max ), ingress slope with lower differences compared with those in estimating blood flow, volume transfer constant ( K trans ), and time to peak.

Conclusions: Individual AIF can provide the most accurate perfusion assessment compared with assessment without AIF or based on population-based AIF correction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
263
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Optics publishes peer-reviewed papers on the use of modern optical technology for improved health care and biomedical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信