后天性脑损伤患者的个案管理:为期两年的实用随机对照试验的可行性和有效性。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Brain injury Pub Date : 2025-01-02 Epub Date: 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2399070
Annemarie P M Stiekema, Johanne C C Rauwenhoff, Desiree Bierlaagh, Mireille Donkervoort, Natska Jansen, Kitty H M Jurrius, Judith Zadoks, Caroline M van Heugten
{"title":"后天性脑损伤患者的个案管理:为期两年的实用随机对照试验的可行性和有效性。","authors":"Annemarie P M Stiekema, Johanne C C Rauwenhoff, Desiree Bierlaagh, Mireille Donkervoort, Natska Jansen, Kitty H M Jurrius, Judith Zadoks, Caroline M van Heugten","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2399070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Case management (CM) aims to facilitate access to and integration of health care and social services. We investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of CM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trial with 219 patients and 114 caregivers randomly allocated to CM (109/59) or care as usual (110/55). CM was based on early and continuous online monitoring of problems and needs. Outcomes were assessed every 6 months with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Secondary outcome domains were participant restrictions, life satisfaction, self-efficacy, caregiver burden, and needs. Multilevel modeling was used. Feasibility aspects were protocol delivery, participants' and case managers' satisfaction, and factors affecting implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between groups. Participation restrictions and unmet needs decreased in both groups within 6 months. Monitoring was successful in 38, and 10 participants asked the CM for support. CM consisted mostly of providing information.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CM based on early and continuous online monitoring does not have benefit in identifying and addressing problems early after relatively mild injury. Unsuccessful monitoring may have hindered access to the case manager and prevented us from evaluating CM as a complex intervention. It remains a challenge to early identify those who could benefit from care coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"39-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case management for people with acquired brain injury: feasibility and effectiveness of a two-year pragmatic randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Annemarie P M Stiekema, Johanne C C Rauwenhoff, Desiree Bierlaagh, Mireille Donkervoort, Natska Jansen, Kitty H M Jurrius, Judith Zadoks, Caroline M van Heugten\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699052.2024.2399070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Case management (CM) aims to facilitate access to and integration of health care and social services. We investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of CM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trial with 219 patients and 114 caregivers randomly allocated to CM (109/59) or care as usual (110/55). CM was based on early and continuous online monitoring of problems and needs. Outcomes were assessed every 6 months with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Secondary outcome domains were participant restrictions, life satisfaction, self-efficacy, caregiver burden, and needs. Multilevel modeling was used. Feasibility aspects were protocol delivery, participants' and case managers' satisfaction, and factors affecting implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between groups. Participation restrictions and unmet needs decreased in both groups within 6 months. Monitoring was successful in 38, and 10 participants asked the CM for support. CM consisted mostly of providing information.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CM based on early and continuous online monitoring does not have benefit in identifying and addressing problems early after relatively mild injury. Unsuccessful monitoring may have hindered access to the case manager and prevented us from evaluating CM as a complex intervention. It remains a challenge to early identify those who could benefit from care coordination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain injury\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"39-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain injury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2399070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2399070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:个案管理(CM)旨在促进医疗保健和社会服务的获取和整合。我们对个案管理的可行性和有效性进行了调查:随机对照试验:219 名患者和 114 名护理人员被随机分配接受个案管理(109/59)或常规护理(110/55)。CM基于对问题和需求的早期和持续在线监测。每 6 个月使用医院焦虑抑郁量表 (HADS) 对结果进行评估。次要结果领域包括参与者限制、生活满意度、自我效能感、照顾者负担和需求。采用了多层次模型。可行性方面包括方案交付、参与者和个案管理者的满意度以及影响实施的因素:结果:各组之间没有明显差异。两组的参与限制和未满足的需求在 6 个月内都有所减少。有 38 名参与者成功接受了监测,10 名参与者向个案管理员寻求支持。医疗咨询主要包括提供信息:讨论:基于早期和持续在线监测的康复指导对于在相对轻微的损伤后及早发现和解决问题并无益处。不成功的监测可能会阻碍与个案管理员的联系,并使我们无法将 "社区管理 "作为一项复杂的干预措施进行评估。如何及早发现那些可以从护理协调中受益的人仍然是一项挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Case management for people with acquired brain injury: feasibility and effectiveness of a two-year pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Background: Case management (CM) aims to facilitate access to and integration of health care and social services. We investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of CM.

Methods: Randomized controlled trial with 219 patients and 114 caregivers randomly allocated to CM (109/59) or care as usual (110/55). CM was based on early and continuous online monitoring of problems and needs. Outcomes were assessed every 6 months with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Secondary outcome domains were participant restrictions, life satisfaction, self-efficacy, caregiver burden, and needs. Multilevel modeling was used. Feasibility aspects were protocol delivery, participants' and case managers' satisfaction, and factors affecting implementation.

Results: There were no significant differences between groups. Participation restrictions and unmet needs decreased in both groups within 6 months. Monitoring was successful in 38, and 10 participants asked the CM for support. CM consisted mostly of providing information.

Discussion: CM based on early and continuous online monitoring does not have benefit in identifying and addressing problems early after relatively mild injury. Unsuccessful monitoring may have hindered access to the case manager and prevented us from evaluating CM as a complex intervention. It remains a challenge to early identify those who could benefit from care coordination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信