中国绿色全要素生产率的增长:"结构红利 "还是 "改革红利"?

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Wenxing Jia, Shengnan Wu, Yang Yang, Xueliang Zhang
{"title":"中国绿色全要素生产率的增长:\"结构红利 \"还是 \"改革红利\"?","authors":"Wenxing Jia,&nbsp;Shengnan Wu,&nbsp;Yang Yang,&nbsp;Xueliang Zhang","doi":"10.1111/grow.12736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>It is critical for promoting high-quality economic development to improve green total factor productivity (GTFP). The “structural dividend” released by the optimization of economic structure and the “reform dividend” brought by market-oriented reform are the two ways to improve GTFP. This paper empirically examines the impact of economic structural changes and marketization progress on GTFP with the spatial dynamic panel model based on the provincial data from 2001 to 2019 in China. The findings are as follows. (1) GTFP is characterized by significant spatial clustering and spatial positive correlation in China. (2) The optimization of economic structure and the improvement of marketization both have significant positive contributions to the improvement of GTFP. (3) The results of effect decomposition show that the optimization of economic structure has a long-term effect on the increase of local GTFP, but only a short-term effect on the surrounding areas. However, the improvement of marketization has a stable short-term and long-term impact on the improvement of local GTFP, while the impact on the surrounding areas is only reflected in the long-term. The results of heterogeneity analysis indicate that the impact of economic structure optimization and market-oriented reform on GTFP is different in different periods and regions, and the corresponding effect decomposition results are also different. Therefore, this paper suggests that it is necessary to optimize the economic structure further and promote market-oriented reforms to release the structural dividends and reform dividends to achieve GTFP growth.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47545,"journal":{"name":"Growth and Change","volume":"55 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth of Green Total Factor Productivity in China: “Structural Dividend” or “Reform Dividend”?\",\"authors\":\"Wenxing Jia,&nbsp;Shengnan Wu,&nbsp;Yang Yang,&nbsp;Xueliang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/grow.12736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>It is critical for promoting high-quality economic development to improve green total factor productivity (GTFP). The “structural dividend” released by the optimization of economic structure and the “reform dividend” brought by market-oriented reform are the two ways to improve GTFP. This paper empirically examines the impact of economic structural changes and marketization progress on GTFP with the spatial dynamic panel model based on the provincial data from 2001 to 2019 in China. The findings are as follows. (1) GTFP is characterized by significant spatial clustering and spatial positive correlation in China. (2) The optimization of economic structure and the improvement of marketization both have significant positive contributions to the improvement of GTFP. (3) The results of effect decomposition show that the optimization of economic structure has a long-term effect on the increase of local GTFP, but only a short-term effect on the surrounding areas. However, the improvement of marketization has a stable short-term and long-term impact on the improvement of local GTFP, while the impact on the surrounding areas is only reflected in the long-term. The results of heterogeneity analysis indicate that the impact of economic structure optimization and market-oriented reform on GTFP is different in different periods and regions, and the corresponding effect decomposition results are also different. Therefore, this paper suggests that it is necessary to optimize the economic structure further and promote market-oriented reforms to release the structural dividends and reform dividends to achieve GTFP growth.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Growth and Change\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Growth and Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.12736\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth and Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.12736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高绿色全要素生产率(GTFP)是推动经济高质量发展的关键。经济结构优化释放的 "结构红利 "和市场化改革带来的 "改革红利 "是提高全要素生产率的两条途径。本文基于2001-2019年中国各省数据,利用空间动态面板模型实证检验了经济结构变化和市场化进程对GTFP的影响。研究结果如下(1)中国 GTFP 具有显著的空间集聚和空间正相关特征。(2)经济结构的优化和市场化程度的提高都对GTFP的提高有显著的正向促进作用。(3)效应分解结果表明,经济结构优化对当地 GTFP 的提高有长期效应,但对周边地区只有短期效应。然而,市场化程度的提高对当地 GTFP 的提高具有稳定的短期和长期影响,而对周边地区的影响只体现在长期方面。异质性分析结果表明,不同时期、不同地区经济结构优化和市场化改革对GTFP的影响不同,相应的效应分解结果也不同。因此,本文认为有必要进一步优化经济结构,推进市场化改革,释放结构红利和改革红利,实现 GTFP 增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Growth of Green Total Factor Productivity in China: “Structural Dividend” or “Reform Dividend”?

It is critical for promoting high-quality economic development to improve green total factor productivity (GTFP). The “structural dividend” released by the optimization of economic structure and the “reform dividend” brought by market-oriented reform are the two ways to improve GTFP. This paper empirically examines the impact of economic structural changes and marketization progress on GTFP with the spatial dynamic panel model based on the provincial data from 2001 to 2019 in China. The findings are as follows. (1) GTFP is characterized by significant spatial clustering and spatial positive correlation in China. (2) The optimization of economic structure and the improvement of marketization both have significant positive contributions to the improvement of GTFP. (3) The results of effect decomposition show that the optimization of economic structure has a long-term effect on the increase of local GTFP, but only a short-term effect on the surrounding areas. However, the improvement of marketization has a stable short-term and long-term impact on the improvement of local GTFP, while the impact on the surrounding areas is only reflected in the long-term. The results of heterogeneity analysis indicate that the impact of economic structure optimization and market-oriented reform on GTFP is different in different periods and regions, and the corresponding effect decomposition results are also different. Therefore, this paper suggests that it is necessary to optimize the economic structure further and promote market-oriented reforms to release the structural dividends and reform dividends to achieve GTFP growth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Growth and Change
Growth and Change Multiple-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Growth and Change is a broadly based forum for scholarly research on all aspects of urban and regional development and policy-making. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal publishes both empirical and theoretical contributions from economics, geography, public finance, urban and regional planning, agricultural economics, public policy, and related fields. These include full-length research articles, Perspectives (contemporary assessments and views on significant issues in urban and regional development) as well as critical book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信