将行星边界纳入生命周期评估的方法:严格审查

IF 12.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Andrea Paulillo , Esther Sanyé-Mengual
{"title":"将行星边界纳入生命周期评估的方法:严格审查","authors":"Andrea Paulillo ,&nbsp;Esther Sanyé-Mengual","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Planetary Boundaries (PBs) pioneering approach defines environmental sustainability in terms of a Safe Operating Space (SOS) for human’s society to develop and thrive. The approach has found fertile ground in combination with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) - a standardised method for assessing the environmental impacts of product systems. In this article, we conduct a detailed review of existing approaches to embed PBs in LCA. We start by exploring the links between PBs control variables and LCA impact categories and then focus on reviewing three approaches (i) absolute environmental sustainability assessment (AESA), (ii) PBs-based normalisation and (iii) PBs-based weighting. We examine four key methodological aspects covering harmonisation of units (between PBs control variables and LCA indicators), definition and allocation of the SOS, regionalisation of boundaries and temporal aspects. We conclude the review with a discussion on applicability, limitations, policy implications and conclusions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100169"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916124000227/pdfft?md5=7ac3ba07db86ce8856d4c62e42b26e40&pid=1-s2.0-S2666916124000227-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to incorporate Planetary Boundaries in Life Cycle Assessment: A critical review\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Paulillo ,&nbsp;Esther Sanyé-Mengual\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Planetary Boundaries (PBs) pioneering approach defines environmental sustainability in terms of a Safe Operating Space (SOS) for human’s society to develop and thrive. The approach has found fertile ground in combination with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) - a standardised method for assessing the environmental impacts of product systems. In this article, we conduct a detailed review of existing approaches to embed PBs in LCA. We start by exploring the links between PBs control variables and LCA impact categories and then focus on reviewing three approaches (i) absolute environmental sustainability assessment (AESA), (ii) PBs-based normalisation and (iii) PBs-based weighting. We examine four key methodological aspects covering harmonisation of units (between PBs control variables and LCA indicators), definition and allocation of the SOS, regionalisation of boundaries and temporal aspects. We conclude the review with a discussion on applicability, limitations, policy implications and conclusions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916124000227/pdfft?md5=7ac3ba07db86ce8856d4c62e42b26e40&pid=1-s2.0-S2666916124000227-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916124000227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916124000227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行星边界(PBs)的开创性方法从安全操作空间(SOS)的角度定义了环境的可持续性,以促进人类社会的发展和繁荣。该方法与生命周期评估(LCA)--一种评估产品系统对环境影响的标准化方法--相结合,找到了肥沃的土壤。在本文中,我们将对现有的将 PB 嵌入 LCA 的方法进行详细回顾。我们首先探讨了 PBs 控制变量与 LCA 影响类别之间的联系,然后重点回顾了三种方法:(i) 绝对环境可持续性评估 (AESA);(ii) 基于 PBs 的归一化;(iii) 基于 PBs 的加权。我们研究了四种关键的方法,包括单位的协调(PBs 控制变量和 LCA 指标之间的协调)、SOS 的定义和分配、边界的区域化和时间方面。最后,我们就适用性、局限性、政策影响和结论进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Approaches to incorporate Planetary Boundaries in Life Cycle Assessment: A critical review

Approaches to incorporate Planetary Boundaries in Life Cycle Assessment: A critical review

The Planetary Boundaries (PBs) pioneering approach defines environmental sustainability in terms of a Safe Operating Space (SOS) for human’s society to develop and thrive. The approach has found fertile ground in combination with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) - a standardised method for assessing the environmental impacts of product systems. In this article, we conduct a detailed review of existing approaches to embed PBs in LCA. We start by exploring the links between PBs control variables and LCA impact categories and then focus on reviewing three approaches (i) absolute environmental sustainability assessment (AESA), (ii) PBs-based normalisation and (iii) PBs-based weighting. We examine four key methodological aspects covering harmonisation of units (between PBs control variables and LCA indicators), definition and allocation of the SOS, regionalisation of boundaries and temporal aspects. We conclude the review with a discussion on applicability, limitations, policy implications and conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信