Nicole Power Guerra, Emely Kruschwitz, Dietmar Krautwurst, Thomas Hummel
{"title":"用于嗅觉训练的四种气味就足够了:一项试验研究。","authors":"Nicole Power Guerra, Emely Kruschwitz, Dietmar Krautwurst, Thomas Hummel","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08930-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Olfactory training (OT) is commonly used for the treatment of olfactory disorders. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate about the most effective OT regimen. We aimed to compare the effects of OT with 7 items (rose, lemon, eucalyptus, cloves, stewed apple, balm, mint) to 4-item-OT (rose, lemon, eucalyptus, cloves) over 3 months. Methods: Participants were 40 patients with olfactory dysfunction receiving 4-item-OT or 7-item-OT and 60 gender- and age-matched individuals with normal sense of smell receiving no OT, 4-item-OT, or 7-item-OT. Before and after the OT we assessed n-butanol odor thresholds, discrimination, and identification (TDI score), additionalthresholds for (R)-(-)-carvone, β-damascenone, salicyclic acid benzylester, the degree of phantosmia and parosmia, cognitive function, and ratings of olfactory function. Results: In both patient groups, the TDI score increased with the use of OT, regardless of the number of odors used (p < 0.001; 3.48 ± 4.21 and lower than control groups). The clinically significant increase of 5.5 points in TDI score correlated with change of ratings of parosmia (r 0.62; p < 0.01) and with ratings of olfactory dysfunction (r = 0.51; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Concluding, OT over a 3-months period with 4 or 7 odors appears to produce similar results, although the sample size has to be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"6445-6458"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Four odorants for olfactory training are enough: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Power Guerra, Emely Kruschwitz, Dietmar Krautwurst, Thomas Hummel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-024-08930-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Olfactory training (OT) is commonly used for the treatment of olfactory disorders. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate about the most effective OT regimen. We aimed to compare the effects of OT with 7 items (rose, lemon, eucalyptus, cloves, stewed apple, balm, mint) to 4-item-OT (rose, lemon, eucalyptus, cloves) over 3 months. Methods: Participants were 40 patients with olfactory dysfunction receiving 4-item-OT or 7-item-OT and 60 gender- and age-matched individuals with normal sense of smell receiving no OT, 4-item-OT, or 7-item-OT. Before and after the OT we assessed n-butanol odor thresholds, discrimination, and identification (TDI score), additionalthresholds for (R)-(-)-carvone, β-damascenone, salicyclic acid benzylester, the degree of phantosmia and parosmia, cognitive function, and ratings of olfactory function. Results: In both patient groups, the TDI score increased with the use of OT, regardless of the number of odors used (p < 0.001; 3.48 ± 4.21 and lower than control groups). The clinically significant increase of 5.5 points in TDI score correlated with change of ratings of parosmia (r 0.62; p < 0.01) and with ratings of olfactory dysfunction (r = 0.51; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Concluding, OT over a 3-months period with 4 or 7 odors appears to produce similar results, although the sample size has to be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6445-6458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564259/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08930-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08930-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景: 嗅觉训练(OT)通常用于治疗嗅觉障碍。然而,关于最有效的嗅觉训练方案仍存在争议。我们旨在比较 7 个项目(玫瑰、柠檬、桉树、丁香、炖苹果、香膏、薄荷)的 OT 与 4 个项目的 OT(玫瑰、柠檬、桉树、丁香)在 3 个月内的效果。研究方法参与者包括 40 名接受 4 项 OT 或 7 项 OT 的嗅觉功能障碍患者,以及 60 名性别和年龄匹配的嗅觉正常者,他们分别未接受任何 OT、4 项 OT 或 7 项 OT。在 OT 之前和之后,我们评估了正丁醇气味阈值、辨别力和识别力(TDI 评分),(R)-(-)-香芹酮、β-大马士革酮、水杨酸苄酯的额外阈值,幻嗅和副嗅的程度,认知功能以及嗅觉功能评分。结果显示在两组患者中,无论使用了多少种气味,TDI 分数都随着 OT 的使用而增加(p): 总之,在为期 3 个月的时间内使用 4 种或 7 种气味进行 OT 似乎能产生相似的效果,但必须考虑样本量。
Four odorants for olfactory training are enough: a pilot study.
Background: Olfactory training (OT) is commonly used for the treatment of olfactory disorders. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate about the most effective OT regimen. We aimed to compare the effects of OT with 7 items (rose, lemon, eucalyptus, cloves, stewed apple, balm, mint) to 4-item-OT (rose, lemon, eucalyptus, cloves) over 3 months. Methods: Participants were 40 patients with olfactory dysfunction receiving 4-item-OT or 7-item-OT and 60 gender- and age-matched individuals with normal sense of smell receiving no OT, 4-item-OT, or 7-item-OT. Before and after the OT we assessed n-butanol odor thresholds, discrimination, and identification (TDI score), additionalthresholds for (R)-(-)-carvone, β-damascenone, salicyclic acid benzylester, the degree of phantosmia and parosmia, cognitive function, and ratings of olfactory function. Results: In both patient groups, the TDI score increased with the use of OT, regardless of the number of odors used (p < 0.001; 3.48 ± 4.21 and lower than control groups). The clinically significant increase of 5.5 points in TDI score correlated with change of ratings of parosmia (r 0.62; p < 0.01) and with ratings of olfactory dysfunction (r = 0.51; p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Concluding, OT over a 3-months period with 4 or 7 odors appears to produce similar results, although the sample size has to be considered.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of
European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board
Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery
"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.