探索使用多种参与式工具让社区卫生工作者参与计划评估和实施:菲律宾案例研究》。

Laura J Brubacher, Lincoln L Lau, Monica Bustos, Melinda Kelly Mijares, Krisha Lim Mar, Warren Dodd
{"title":"探索使用多种参与式工具让社区卫生工作者参与计划评估和实施:菲律宾案例研究》。","authors":"Laura J Brubacher, Lincoln L Lau, Monica Bustos, Melinda Kelly Mijares, Krisha Lim Mar, Warren Dodd","doi":"10.1177/2752535X241280353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the use of three participatory tools within a Philippines-based case study with community health workers (CHWs) by comparing and contrasting the process and data generated across the tools, and critically reflecting on adaptations and facilitation considerations that affected the tools' use. Facilitator notes and audio-recordings of discussions were integrated and analyzed thematically. Tools differed by the type of data generated: program-specific data related to CHWs' roles and responsibilities or data on broader structural factors. A stepwise approach within each tool facilitated focused, in-depth sharing, as did initial paired discussions that allowed exchange of knowledge and experiences among CHWs. Facilitators required topic- and context-specific knowledge to guide discussion effectively. CHWs discussed challenges and successes in their roles; program recommendations; and broader challenges related to healthcare delivery in their communities. This study contributes critical insights on the use of participatory tools to promote the inclusion of implementer perspectives in health program co-design, implementation, and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X241280353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Use of Multiple Participatory Tools to Engage Community Health Workers in Program Evaluation and Implementation: A Case Study From the Philippines.\",\"authors\":\"Laura J Brubacher, Lincoln L Lau, Monica Bustos, Melinda Kelly Mijares, Krisha Lim Mar, Warren Dodd\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2752535X241280353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explored the use of three participatory tools within a Philippines-based case study with community health workers (CHWs) by comparing and contrasting the process and data generated across the tools, and critically reflecting on adaptations and facilitation considerations that affected the tools' use. Facilitator notes and audio-recordings of discussions were integrated and analyzed thematically. Tools differed by the type of data generated: program-specific data related to CHWs' roles and responsibilities or data on broader structural factors. A stepwise approach within each tool facilitated focused, in-depth sharing, as did initial paired discussions that allowed exchange of knowledge and experiences among CHWs. Facilitators required topic- and context-specific knowledge to guide discussion effectively. CHWs discussed challenges and successes in their roles; program recommendations; and broader challenges related to healthcare delivery in their communities. This study contributes critical insights on the use of participatory tools to promote the inclusion of implementer perspectives in health program co-design, implementation, and evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community health equity research & policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2752535X241280353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community health equity research & policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X241280353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X241280353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过比较和对比各种工具的使用过程和产生的数据,并批判性地反思影响工具使用的调整和促进方面的考虑因素,探讨了三种参与式工具在菲律宾社区卫生工作者(CHWs)案例研究中的使用情况。对主持人的笔记和讨论录音进行了整合和专题分析。工具因生成的数据类型而异:与社区保健工作者的角色和职责相关的特定项目数据,或与更广泛的结构性因素相关的数据。每种工具中的循序渐进法都促进了集中、深入的分享,最初的配对讨论也是如此,这使得社区保健工作者之间能够交流知识和经验。主持人需要了解特定主题和背景知识,以有效引导讨论。社区保健工作者讨论了在其角色中面临的挑战和取得的成功、项目建议以及与社区医疗保健服务相关的更广泛的挑战。这项研究为使用参与式工具促进将实施者的观点纳入医疗项目的共同设计、实施和评估提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Use of Multiple Participatory Tools to Engage Community Health Workers in Program Evaluation and Implementation: A Case Study From the Philippines.

This study explored the use of three participatory tools within a Philippines-based case study with community health workers (CHWs) by comparing and contrasting the process and data generated across the tools, and critically reflecting on adaptations and facilitation considerations that affected the tools' use. Facilitator notes and audio-recordings of discussions were integrated and analyzed thematically. Tools differed by the type of data generated: program-specific data related to CHWs' roles and responsibilities or data on broader structural factors. A stepwise approach within each tool facilitated focused, in-depth sharing, as did initial paired discussions that allowed exchange of knowledge and experiences among CHWs. Facilitators required topic- and context-specific knowledge to guide discussion effectively. CHWs discussed challenges and successes in their roles; program recommendations; and broader challenges related to healthcare delivery in their communities. This study contributes critical insights on the use of participatory tools to promote the inclusion of implementer perspectives in health program co-design, implementation, and evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信