评估 18F-FDG PET/CT 在原发性不明癌症中的实用性。

Tharani Sivakumaran, Anthony Cardin, Jason Callahan, Hui-Li Wong, Richard W Tothill, Rodney J Hicks, Linda R Mileshkin
{"title":"评估 18F-FDG PET/CT 在原发性不明癌症中的实用性。","authors":"Tharani Sivakumaran, Anthony Cardin, Jason Callahan, Hui-Li Wong, Richard W Tothill, Rodney J Hicks, Linda R Mileshkin","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.267274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) represents a heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors for which standardized diagnostic work-up fails to identify the primary site. We aimed to describe the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre experience with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in extracervical CUP with respect to detection of a primary site and its impact on management. A secondary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with and without a detected primary site. <b>Methods:</b> CUP patients treated between 2014 and 2020 were identified from medical oncology clinics and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT records. Information collated from electronic medical records included the suspected primary site and treatment details before and after <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. Clinicopathologic details and genomic analysis were used to determine the clinically suspected primary site and compared against 2 independent masked reads of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT images by nuclear medicine specialists to determine sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the rate of detection of the primary site. <b>Results:</b> We identified 147 patients, 65% of whom had undergone molecular profiling. The median age at diagnosis was 61 y (range, 20-84 y), and the median follow-up time was 74 mo (range, 26-83 mo). Eighty-two percent were classified as having an unfavorable CUP subtype as per international guidelines.<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a primary site detection rate of 41%, resulted in a change in management in 22%, and identified previously occult disease sites in 37%. Median OS was 16.8 mo for all patients and 104.7 and 12.1 mo for favorable and unfavorable CUP subtypes, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Median OS in CUP patients when using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, clinicopathologic, and genomic information was 19.8 and 8.5 mo when a primary site was detected and not detected, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.016). Multivariable analysis of survival adjusted for age and sex remained significant for identification of a potential primary site (<i>P</i> < 0.001), a favorable CUP (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 1 or less (<i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT plays a complementary role in CUP diagnostic work-up and was able to determine the likely primary site in 41% of cases. OS is improved with primary site identification, demonstrating the value of access to diagnostic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for CUP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1557-1563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Utility of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in Cancer of Unknown Primary.\",\"authors\":\"Tharani Sivakumaran, Anthony Cardin, Jason Callahan, Hui-Li Wong, Richard W Tothill, Rodney J Hicks, Linda R Mileshkin\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.123.267274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) represents a heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors for which standardized diagnostic work-up fails to identify the primary site. We aimed to describe the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre experience with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in extracervical CUP with respect to detection of a primary site and its impact on management. A secondary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with and without a detected primary site. <b>Methods:</b> CUP patients treated between 2014 and 2020 were identified from medical oncology clinics and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT records. Information collated from electronic medical records included the suspected primary site and treatment details before and after <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. Clinicopathologic details and genomic analysis were used to determine the clinically suspected primary site and compared against 2 independent masked reads of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT images by nuclear medicine specialists to determine sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the rate of detection of the primary site. <b>Results:</b> We identified 147 patients, 65% of whom had undergone molecular profiling. The median age at diagnosis was 61 y (range, 20-84 y), and the median follow-up time was 74 mo (range, 26-83 mo). Eighty-two percent were classified as having an unfavorable CUP subtype as per international guidelines.<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a primary site detection rate of 41%, resulted in a change in management in 22%, and identified previously occult disease sites in 37%. Median OS was 16.8 mo for all patients and 104.7 and 12.1 mo for favorable and unfavorable CUP subtypes, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Median OS in CUP patients when using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, clinicopathologic, and genomic information was 19.8 and 8.5 mo when a primary site was detected and not detected, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.016). Multivariable analysis of survival adjusted for age and sex remained significant for identification of a potential primary site (<i>P</i> < 0.001), a favorable CUP (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 1 or less (<i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT plays a complementary role in CUP diagnostic work-up and was able to determine the likely primary site in 41% of cases. OS is improved with primary site identification, demonstrating the value of access to diagnostic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for CUP patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1557-1563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原发部位不明的癌症(CUP)是一组异质性的转移性肿瘤,标准化的诊断检查无法确定其原发部位。我们旨在描述彼得-麦克卡勒姆癌症中心在宫颈外癌CUP中使用18F-FDG PET/CT检测原发部位的经验及其对治疗的影响。另一个目的是比较检测出原发部位和未检测出原发部位的患者的总生存率(OS)。方法从肿瘤内科诊所和 18F-FDG PET/CT 记录中确定 2014 年至 2020 年间接受治疗的 CUP 患者。从电子病历中整理的信息包括疑似原发部位以及 18F-FDG PET/CT 前后的治疗细节。临床病理详情和基因组分析用于确定临床疑似原发部位,并与核医学专家对 18F-FDG PET/CT 图像的 2 次独立遮蔽读取进行比较,以确定原发部位的敏感性、特异性、准确性和检出率。结果:我们确定了 147 名患者,其中 65% 接受了分子图谱分析。诊断时的中位年龄为 61 岁(范围为 20-84 岁),中位随访时间为 74 个月(范围为 26-83 个月)。根据国际指南,82%的患者被归类为不利CUP亚型。18F-FDG PET/CT的原发部位检出率为41%,22%的患者改变了治疗方案,37%的患者发现了之前隐匿的疾病部位。所有患者的中位生存期为 16.8 个月,CUP 亚型中位生存期分别为 104.7 个月和 12.1 个月(P < 0.0001)。使用18F-FDG PET/CT、临床病理和基因组信息时,当检测到原发部位和未检测到原发部位时,CUP患者的中位OS分别为19.8个月和8.5个月(P = 0.016)。对年龄和性别进行调整后的生存期多变量分析结果显示,潜在原发部位的确定(P < 0.001)、CUP 的良好性(P < 0.001)和东部合作肿瘤学组状态为 1 或 1 以下(P < 0.001)仍具有显著意义。结论:18F-FDG PET/CT 在 CUP 诊断工作中起辅助作用,能确定 41% 病例的可能原发部位。随着原发部位的确定,OS 有所改善,这表明了 18F-FDG PET/CT 诊断技术对 CUP 患者的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Cancer of Unknown Primary.

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) represents a heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors for which standardized diagnostic work-up fails to identify the primary site. We aimed to describe the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre experience with 18F-FDG PET/CT in extracervical CUP with respect to detection of a primary site and its impact on management. A secondary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with and without a detected primary site. Methods: CUP patients treated between 2014 and 2020 were identified from medical oncology clinics and 18F-FDG PET/CT records. Information collated from electronic medical records included the suspected primary site and treatment details before and after 18F-FDG PET/CT. Clinicopathologic details and genomic analysis were used to determine the clinically suspected primary site and compared against 2 independent masked reads of 18F-FDG PET/CT images by nuclear medicine specialists to determine sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the rate of detection of the primary site. Results: We identified 147 patients, 65% of whom had undergone molecular profiling. The median age at diagnosis was 61 y (range, 20-84 y), and the median follow-up time was 74 mo (range, 26-83 mo). Eighty-two percent were classified as having an unfavorable CUP subtype as per international guidelines.18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a primary site detection rate of 41%, resulted in a change in management in 22%, and identified previously occult disease sites in 37%. Median OS was 16.8 mo for all patients and 104.7 and 12.1 mo for favorable and unfavorable CUP subtypes, respectively (P < 0.0001). Median OS in CUP patients when using 18F-FDG PET/CT, clinicopathologic, and genomic information was 19.8 and 8.5 mo when a primary site was detected and not detected, respectively (P = 0.016). Multivariable analysis of survival adjusted for age and sex remained significant for identification of a potential primary site (P < 0.001), a favorable CUP (P < 0.001), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 1 or less (P < 0.001). Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/CT plays a complementary role in CUP diagnostic work-up and was able to determine the likely primary site in 41% of cases. OS is improved with primary site identification, demonstrating the value of access to diagnostic 18F-FDG PET/CT for CUP patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信