Christel J Hessels, Elisabeth L de Moor, Marike H F Deutz, Odilia M Laceulle, Marcel A G Van Aken
{"title":"青少年人格病理学:比较分类模式和替代模式与内化和外化病理学以及年龄适当的社会心理功能的关系。","authors":"Christel J Hessels, Elisabeth L de Moor, Marike H F Deutz, Odilia M Laceulle, Marcel A G Van Aken","doi":"10.1037/per0000681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Youth with personality pathology are at a greater risk of developing broader psychopathology and experiencing poorer life outcomes in general. Therefore, detecting personality problems, specifically features of borderline personality disorder (BPD), provides opportunities for early intervention. In this study, we investigated the incremental value of Criteria A and B of the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) compared to a BPD symptom count based on the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition Section II personality disorder model in broader psychopathology (i.e., internalizing and externalizing symptoms) and age-adequate psychosocial functioning (i.e., attainment of developmental milestones). In a clinical sample of 246 young people (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 19.22, <i>SD</i> = 2.76, 81.7% female), separate path analyses showed that a BPD symptom count, Criterion A, and Criterion B were all relatively strongly related to the outcome measures. In a combined path model, the AMPD and especially Criterion B explained additional variance in internalizing and externalizing pathology and age-adequate psychosocial functioning. The current results underscore the value of the AMPD for the early detection of negative psychopathological and psychosocial outcomes commonly associated with BPD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":"15 5","pages":"293-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality pathology in youth: A comparison of the categorical and alternative model in relation to internalizing and externalizing pathology and age-adequate psychosocial functioning.\",\"authors\":\"Christel J Hessels, Elisabeth L de Moor, Marike H F Deutz, Odilia M Laceulle, Marcel A G Van Aken\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/per0000681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Youth with personality pathology are at a greater risk of developing broader psychopathology and experiencing poorer life outcomes in general. Therefore, detecting personality problems, specifically features of borderline personality disorder (BPD), provides opportunities for early intervention. In this study, we investigated the incremental value of Criteria A and B of the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) compared to a BPD symptom count based on the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition Section II personality disorder model in broader psychopathology (i.e., internalizing and externalizing symptoms) and age-adequate psychosocial functioning (i.e., attainment of developmental milestones). In a clinical sample of 246 young people (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 19.22, <i>SD</i> = 2.76, 81.7% female), separate path analyses showed that a BPD symptom count, Criterion A, and Criterion B were all relatively strongly related to the outcome measures. In a combined path model, the AMPD and especially Criterion B explained additional variance in internalizing and externalizing pathology and age-adequate psychosocial functioning. The current results underscore the value of the AMPD for the early detection of negative psychopathological and psychosocial outcomes commonly associated with BPD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality disorders\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"293-303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有人格病态的青少年有更大的风险发展成更广泛的精神病态,并在总体上经历更糟糕的生活结果。因此,检测人格问题,特别是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的特征,为早期干预提供了机会。在这项研究中,我们调查了人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的标准 A 和标准 B 与基于《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版第二部分人格障碍模型的 BPD 症状计数相比,在更广泛的精神病理学(即内化和外化症状)和适龄心理社会功能(即达到发育里程碑)方面的增量价值。在一个由 246 名青少年(年龄=19.22,标准差=2.76,81.7%为女性)组成的临床样本中,单独的路径分析显示,BPD 症状计数、标准 A 和标准 B 都与结果测量有相对密切的关系。在一个综合路径模型中,AMPD,尤其是标准 B,解释了内化和外化病理以及与年龄相适应的心理社会功能的额外变异。目前的研究结果凸显了 AMPD 在早期检测与 BPD 常见的负面心理病理和社会心理结果方面的价值。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
Personality pathology in youth: A comparison of the categorical and alternative model in relation to internalizing and externalizing pathology and age-adequate psychosocial functioning.
Youth with personality pathology are at a greater risk of developing broader psychopathology and experiencing poorer life outcomes in general. Therefore, detecting personality problems, specifically features of borderline personality disorder (BPD), provides opportunities for early intervention. In this study, we investigated the incremental value of Criteria A and B of the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) compared to a BPD symptom count based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition Section II personality disorder model in broader psychopathology (i.e., internalizing and externalizing symptoms) and age-adequate psychosocial functioning (i.e., attainment of developmental milestones). In a clinical sample of 246 young people (Mage = 19.22, SD = 2.76, 81.7% female), separate path analyses showed that a BPD symptom count, Criterion A, and Criterion B were all relatively strongly related to the outcome measures. In a combined path model, the AMPD and especially Criterion B explained additional variance in internalizing and externalizing pathology and age-adequate psychosocial functioning. The current results underscore the value of the AMPD for the early detection of negative psychopathological and psychosocial outcomes commonly associated with BPD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).