确定肌肉骨骼疼痛患者和健康参与者疼痛时间总和的多种方法:范围综述。

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Pain Reports Pub Date : 2024-09-04 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001176
Sjoerd C Kielstra, Roland R Reezigt, Michel W Coppieters, Ralph de Vries, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Kristian K Petersen, David Yarnitsky, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters
{"title":"确定肌肉骨骼疼痛患者和健康参与者疼痛时间总和的多种方法:范围综述。","authors":"Sjoerd C Kielstra, Roland R Reezigt, Michel W Coppieters, Ralph de Vries, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Kristian K Petersen, David Yarnitsky, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Temporal summation of pain (TSP) is a human proxy for wind-up of dorsal horn neurons as assessed in animals. The common paradigm for eliciting TSP is evoked by repetitive nociceptive stimuli of equal intensity. Various stimulation and assessment protocols have been used. This scoping review aims to provide insight into key elements of TSP stimulation and assessment: modality, instruments, test location, familiarization, train characteristics, and calculations. PubMed, Embase, and Ebsco/CINAHL were searched for studies that measured TSP in adults with musculoskeletal conditions and healthy people. Four hundred six studies were included. Mechanical stimuli were the most commonly used modality (250 studies), followed by thermal stimuli (125 studies). Forty-six different instruments were used. Disregarding studies on widespread musculoskeletal pain and healthy participants, 40 studies evaluated TSP at painful sites, 77 in remote areas, and 66 in both locations. Of the 13 tested locations in patients, the hand (74 studies), lower leg (64 studies), and forearm (59 studies) were most commonly tested. A single practice round was the most common familiarization method (46 studies). Repeated stimuli were applied using 31 different frequencies (0.03-200 Hz) and sustained stimulations ranging from 5 to 1080 seconds were used. Twenty-two different train lengths, 63 different calculations (37 absolute, 19 relative, and 7 alternatives using data directly), and 14 different outcome measures (eg, self-reported pain rating scales and reflex thresholds) were used. Temporal summation of pain protocols vary excessively, hindering the comparison and pooling of results. None of the studies provided substantiation for their protocol choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"9 5","pages":"e1176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A myriad of methods to determine temporal summation of pain in people with musculoskeletal pain and healthy participants: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Sjoerd C Kielstra, Roland R Reezigt, Michel W Coppieters, Ralph de Vries, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Kristian K Petersen, David Yarnitsky, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Temporal summation of pain (TSP) is a human proxy for wind-up of dorsal horn neurons as assessed in animals. The common paradigm for eliciting TSP is evoked by repetitive nociceptive stimuli of equal intensity. Various stimulation and assessment protocols have been used. This scoping review aims to provide insight into key elements of TSP stimulation and assessment: modality, instruments, test location, familiarization, train characteristics, and calculations. PubMed, Embase, and Ebsco/CINAHL were searched for studies that measured TSP in adults with musculoskeletal conditions and healthy people. Four hundred six studies were included. Mechanical stimuli were the most commonly used modality (250 studies), followed by thermal stimuli (125 studies). Forty-six different instruments were used. Disregarding studies on widespread musculoskeletal pain and healthy participants, 40 studies evaluated TSP at painful sites, 77 in remote areas, and 66 in both locations. Of the 13 tested locations in patients, the hand (74 studies), lower leg (64 studies), and forearm (59 studies) were most commonly tested. A single practice round was the most common familiarization method (46 studies). Repeated stimuli were applied using 31 different frequencies (0.03-200 Hz) and sustained stimulations ranging from 5 to 1080 seconds were used. Twenty-two different train lengths, 63 different calculations (37 absolute, 19 relative, and 7 alternatives using data directly), and 14 different outcome measures (eg, self-reported pain rating scales and reflex thresholds) were used. Temporal summation of pain protocols vary excessively, hindering the comparison and pooling of results. None of the studies provided substantiation for their protocol choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Reports\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"e1176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疼痛的时间累加(TSP)是在动物体内评估背角神经元上发条的人类替代物。诱发 TSP 的常见范例是由同等强度的重复性痛觉刺激引起的。目前已使用了多种刺激和评估方案。本范围综述旨在深入探讨 TSP 刺激和评估的关键要素:模式、仪器、测试位置、熟悉程度、列车特征和计算。我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Ebsco/CINAHL 中检索了对患有肌肉骨骼疾病的成人和健康人进行 TSP 测量的研究。共纳入 46 项研究。机械刺激是最常用的方式(250 项研究),其次是热刺激(125 项研究)。共使用了 46 种不同的仪器。除去有关广泛性肌肉骨骼疼痛和健康参与者的研究,40 项研究评估了疼痛部位的热刺激疗法,77 项研究评估了偏远地区的热刺激疗法,66 项研究评估了两个部位的热刺激疗法。在患者的 13 个测试部位中,手部(74 项研究)、小腿(64 项研究)和前臂(59 项研究)是最常见的测试部位。单轮练习是最常见的熟悉方法(46 项研究)。重复刺激使用了 31 种不同的频率(0.03-200 赫兹),持续刺激时间从 5 秒到 1080 秒不等。使用了 22 种不同的训练长度、63 种不同的计算方法(37 种绝对计算方法、19 种相对计算方法和 7 种直接使用数据的替代计算方法)以及 14 种不同的结果测量方法(如自我报告的疼痛评分量表和反射阈值)。疼痛方案的时间总和差异过大,妨碍了结果的比较和汇总。没有一项研究为其方案选择提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A myriad of methods to determine temporal summation of pain in people with musculoskeletal pain and healthy participants: a scoping review.

Temporal summation of pain (TSP) is a human proxy for wind-up of dorsal horn neurons as assessed in animals. The common paradigm for eliciting TSP is evoked by repetitive nociceptive stimuli of equal intensity. Various stimulation and assessment protocols have been used. This scoping review aims to provide insight into key elements of TSP stimulation and assessment: modality, instruments, test location, familiarization, train characteristics, and calculations. PubMed, Embase, and Ebsco/CINAHL were searched for studies that measured TSP in adults with musculoskeletal conditions and healthy people. Four hundred six studies were included. Mechanical stimuli were the most commonly used modality (250 studies), followed by thermal stimuli (125 studies). Forty-six different instruments were used. Disregarding studies on widespread musculoskeletal pain and healthy participants, 40 studies evaluated TSP at painful sites, 77 in remote areas, and 66 in both locations. Of the 13 tested locations in patients, the hand (74 studies), lower leg (64 studies), and forearm (59 studies) were most commonly tested. A single practice round was the most common familiarization method (46 studies). Repeated stimuli were applied using 31 different frequencies (0.03-200 Hz) and sustained stimulations ranging from 5 to 1080 seconds were used. Twenty-two different train lengths, 63 different calculations (37 absolute, 19 relative, and 7 alternatives using data directly), and 14 different outcome measures (eg, self-reported pain rating scales and reflex thresholds) were used. Temporal summation of pain protocols vary excessively, hindering the comparison and pooling of results. None of the studies provided substantiation for their protocol choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信