多韧带膝关节损伤(MLKI):关于术语、诊断、治疗和康复的专家共识声明

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Iain Robert Murray, Navnit S Makaram, Andrew G Geeslin, Jorge Chahla, Gilbert Moatshe, Kay Crossley, Michelle E Kew, Aileen Davis, Maria Tuca, Hollis Potter, Dina C Janse van Rensburg, Carolyn A Emery, SeungPyo Eun, Hege Grindem, Frank R Noyes, Robert G Marx, Chris Harner, Bruce A Levy, Enda King, James L Cook, Daniel B Whelan, George F Hatch, Christopher J Wahl, Kristian Thorborg, James J Irrgang, Nicolas Pujol, Michael J Medvecky, Michael J Stuart, Aaron J Krych, Lars Engebretsen, James P Stannard, Peter MacDonald, Romain Seil, Gregory C Fanelli, Travis G Maak, K Donald Shelbourne, Evert Verhagen, Volker Musahl, Michael T Hirschmann, Mark D Miller, Robert C Schenck, Robert F LaPrade
{"title":"多韧带膝关节损伤(MLKI):关于术语、诊断、治疗和康复的专家共识声明","authors":"Iain Robert Murray, Navnit S Makaram, Andrew G Geeslin, Jorge Chahla, Gilbert Moatshe, Kay Crossley, Michelle E Kew, Aileen Davis, Maria Tuca, Hollis Potter, Dina C Janse van Rensburg, Carolyn A Emery, SeungPyo Eun, Hege Grindem, Frank R Noyes, Robert G Marx, Chris Harner, Bruce A Levy, Enda King, James L Cook, Daniel B Whelan, George F Hatch, Christopher J Wahl, Kristian Thorborg, James J Irrgang, Nicolas Pujol, Michael J Medvecky, Michael J Stuart, Aaron J Krych, Lars Engebretsen, James P Stannard, Peter MacDonald, Romain Seil, Gregory C Fanelli, Travis G Maak, K Donald Shelbourne, Evert Verhagen, Volker Musahl, Michael T Hirschmann, Mark D Miller, Robert C Schenck, Robert F LaPrade","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) represent a broad spectrum of pathology with potentially devastating consequences. Currently, disagreement in the terminology, diagnosis and treatment of these injuries limits clinical care and research. This study aimed to develop consensus on the nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation strategies for patients with MLKI, while identifying important research priorities for further study. An international consensus process was conducted using validated Delphi methodology in line with British Journal of Sports Medicine guidelines. A multidisciplinary panel of 39 members from 14 countries, completed 3 rounds of online surveys exploring aspects of nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and future research priorities. Levels of agreement (LoA) with each statement were rated anonymously on a 5-point Likert scale, with experts encouraged to suggest modifications or additional statements. LoA for consensus in the final round were defined ‘a priori’ if >75% of respondents agreed and fewer than 10% disagreed, and dissenting viewpoints were recorded and discussed. After three Delphi rounds, 50 items (92.6%) reached consensus. Key statements that reached consensus within nomenclature included a clear definition for MLKI (LoA 97.4%) and the need for an updated MLKI classification system that classifies injury mechanism, extent of non-ligamentous structures injured and the presence or absence of dislocation. Within diagnosis, consensus was reached that there should be a low threshold for assessment with CT angiography for MLKI within a high-energy context and for certain injury patterns including bicruciate and PLC injuries (LoA 89.7%). The value of stress radiography or intraoperative fluoroscopy also reached consensus (LoA 89.7%). Within treatment, it was generally agreed that existing literature generally favours operative management of MLKI, particularly for young patients (LoA 100%), and that single-stage surgery should be performed whenever possible (LoA 92.3%). This consensus statement will facilitate clinical communication in MLKI, the care of these patients and future research within MLKI.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"150 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiligament knee injury (MLKI): an expert consensus statement on nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"Iain Robert Murray, Navnit S Makaram, Andrew G Geeslin, Jorge Chahla, Gilbert Moatshe, Kay Crossley, Michelle E Kew, Aileen Davis, Maria Tuca, Hollis Potter, Dina C Janse van Rensburg, Carolyn A Emery, SeungPyo Eun, Hege Grindem, Frank R Noyes, Robert G Marx, Chris Harner, Bruce A Levy, Enda King, James L Cook, Daniel B Whelan, George F Hatch, Christopher J Wahl, Kristian Thorborg, James J Irrgang, Nicolas Pujol, Michael J Medvecky, Michael J Stuart, Aaron J Krych, Lars Engebretsen, James P Stannard, Peter MacDonald, Romain Seil, Gregory C Fanelli, Travis G Maak, K Donald Shelbourne, Evert Verhagen, Volker Musahl, Michael T Hirschmann, Mark D Miller, Robert C Schenck, Robert F LaPrade\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) represent a broad spectrum of pathology with potentially devastating consequences. Currently, disagreement in the terminology, diagnosis and treatment of these injuries limits clinical care and research. This study aimed to develop consensus on the nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation strategies for patients with MLKI, while identifying important research priorities for further study. An international consensus process was conducted using validated Delphi methodology in line with British Journal of Sports Medicine guidelines. A multidisciplinary panel of 39 members from 14 countries, completed 3 rounds of online surveys exploring aspects of nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and future research priorities. Levels of agreement (LoA) with each statement were rated anonymously on a 5-point Likert scale, with experts encouraged to suggest modifications or additional statements. LoA for consensus in the final round were defined ‘a priori’ if >75% of respondents agreed and fewer than 10% disagreed, and dissenting viewpoints were recorded and discussed. After three Delphi rounds, 50 items (92.6%) reached consensus. Key statements that reached consensus within nomenclature included a clear definition for MLKI (LoA 97.4%) and the need for an updated MLKI classification system that classifies injury mechanism, extent of non-ligamentous structures injured and the presence or absence of dislocation. Within diagnosis, consensus was reached that there should be a low threshold for assessment with CT angiography for MLKI within a high-energy context and for certain injury patterns including bicruciate and PLC injuries (LoA 89.7%). The value of stress radiography or intraoperative fluoroscopy also reached consensus (LoA 89.7%). Within treatment, it was generally agreed that existing literature generally favours operative management of MLKI, particularly for young patients (LoA 100%), and that single-stage surgery should be performed whenever possible (LoA 92.3%). This consensus statement will facilitate clinical communication in MLKI, the care of these patients and future research within MLKI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108089\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

膝关节多韧带损伤(MLKIs)是一种范围广泛的病理现象,可能造成严重后果。目前,在这些损伤的术语、诊断和治疗方面存在的分歧限制了临床护理和研究。本研究旨在就 MLKI 患者的术语、诊断、治疗和康复策略达成共识,同时确定进一步研究的重要优先事项。根据《英国运动医学杂志》(British Journal of Sports Medicine)的指导原则,采用经过验证的德尔菲法(Delphi methodology)达成了国际共识。由来自 14 个国家的 39 名成员组成的多学科小组完成了三轮在线调查,探讨了术语、诊断、治疗、康复和未来研究重点等方面的问题。专家们对每项陈述的同意度(LoA)均采用 5 点李克特量表进行匿名评分,并鼓励专家们提出修改或补充陈述的建议。如果同意的受访者超过 75%,不同意的受访者少于 10%,则 "先验 "定义最后一轮共识的 LoA,并记录和讨论不同观点。经过三轮德尔菲讨论,50 个项目(92.6%)达成了共识。在术语方面达成共识的主要声明包括:明确 MLKI 的定义(LoA 97.4%),以及需要更新 MLKI 分类系统,对损伤机制、非韧带结构损伤程度以及是否存在脱位进行分类。在诊断方面达成的共识是,在高能量情况下和某些损伤模式下,包括双韧带损伤和 PLC 损伤(LoA 89.7%),使用 CT 血管造影评估 MLKI 的门槛应该较低(LoA 89.7%)。应力放射摄影或术中透视的价值也已达成共识(LoA 89.7%)。在治疗方面,与会者普遍认为现有文献普遍倾向于对 MLKI 进行手术治疗,尤其是对年轻患者(LoA 100%),并认为应尽可能进行单阶段手术(LoA 92.3%)。这份共识声明将有助于MLKI的临床交流、这些患者的护理和未来的MLKI研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiligament knee injury (MLKI): an expert consensus statement on nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation
Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) represent a broad spectrum of pathology with potentially devastating consequences. Currently, disagreement in the terminology, diagnosis and treatment of these injuries limits clinical care and research. This study aimed to develop consensus on the nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation strategies for patients with MLKI, while identifying important research priorities for further study. An international consensus process was conducted using validated Delphi methodology in line with British Journal of Sports Medicine guidelines. A multidisciplinary panel of 39 members from 14 countries, completed 3 rounds of online surveys exploring aspects of nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and future research priorities. Levels of agreement (LoA) with each statement were rated anonymously on a 5-point Likert scale, with experts encouraged to suggest modifications or additional statements. LoA for consensus in the final round were defined ‘a priori’ if >75% of respondents agreed and fewer than 10% disagreed, and dissenting viewpoints were recorded and discussed. After three Delphi rounds, 50 items (92.6%) reached consensus. Key statements that reached consensus within nomenclature included a clear definition for MLKI (LoA 97.4%) and the need for an updated MLKI classification system that classifies injury mechanism, extent of non-ligamentous structures injured and the presence or absence of dislocation. Within diagnosis, consensus was reached that there should be a low threshold for assessment with CT angiography for MLKI within a high-energy context and for certain injury patterns including bicruciate and PLC injuries (LoA 89.7%). The value of stress radiography or intraoperative fluoroscopy also reached consensus (LoA 89.7%). Within treatment, it was generally agreed that existing literature generally favours operative management of MLKI, particularly for young patients (LoA 100%), and that single-stage surgery should be performed whenever possible (LoA 92.3%). This consensus statement will facilitate clinical communication in MLKI, the care of these patients and future research within MLKI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信