农场动物中 CMNR 组细菌的诊断

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Cintia Sena Carvalho , Vitória M.S. de Aquino , Roberto Meyer , Núbia Seyffert , Thiago L.P. Castro
{"title":"农场动物中 CMNR 组细菌的诊断","authors":"Cintia Sena Carvalho ,&nbsp;Vitória M.S. de Aquino ,&nbsp;Roberto Meyer ,&nbsp;Núbia Seyffert ,&nbsp;Thiago L.P. Castro","doi":"10.1016/j.cimid.2024.102230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The CMNR group comprises bacteria of the genera <em>Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium</em>, <em>Nocardia</em>, and <em>Rhodococcus</em> and share cell wall and DNA content characteristics. Many pathogenic CMNR bacteria cause diseases such as mastitis, lymphadenitis, and pneumonia in farmed animals, which cause economic losses for breeders and represent a threat to public health. Traditional diagnosis in CMNR involves isolating target bacteria on general or selective media and conducting metabolic analyses with the assistance of laboratory biochemical identification systems. Advanced mass spectrometry may also support diagnosing these bacteria in the clinic's daily routine despite some challenges, such as the need for isolated bacteria. In difficult identification among some CMNR members, molecular methods using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) emerge as reliable options for correct specification that is sometimes achieved directly from clinical samples such as tracheobronchial aspirates and feces. On the other hand, immunological diagnostics such as the skin test or Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> yield promising results in subclinical infections with no bacterial growth involved. In this review, we present the methods most commonly used to diagnose pathogenic CMNR bacteria and discuss their advantages and limitations, as well as challenges and perspectives on adopting new technologies in diagnostics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50999,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis of bacteria from the CMNR group in farm animals\",\"authors\":\"Cintia Sena Carvalho ,&nbsp;Vitória M.S. de Aquino ,&nbsp;Roberto Meyer ,&nbsp;Núbia Seyffert ,&nbsp;Thiago L.P. Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cimid.2024.102230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The CMNR group comprises bacteria of the genera <em>Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium</em>, <em>Nocardia</em>, and <em>Rhodococcus</em> and share cell wall and DNA content characteristics. Many pathogenic CMNR bacteria cause diseases such as mastitis, lymphadenitis, and pneumonia in farmed animals, which cause economic losses for breeders and represent a threat to public health. Traditional diagnosis in CMNR involves isolating target bacteria on general or selective media and conducting metabolic analyses with the assistance of laboratory biochemical identification systems. Advanced mass spectrometry may also support diagnosing these bacteria in the clinic's daily routine despite some challenges, such as the need for isolated bacteria. In difficult identification among some CMNR members, molecular methods using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) emerge as reliable options for correct specification that is sometimes achieved directly from clinical samples such as tracheobronchial aspirates and feces. On the other hand, immunological diagnostics such as the skin test or Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> yield promising results in subclinical infections with no bacterial growth involved. In this review, we present the methods most commonly used to diagnose pathogenic CMNR bacteria and discuss their advantages and limitations, as well as challenges and perspectives on adopting new technologies in diagnostics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147957124001073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147957124001073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CMNR 细菌群包括棒状杆菌属、分枝杆菌属、诺卡氏菌属和红球菌属的细菌,它们具有相同的细胞壁和 DNA 含量特征。许多致病性 CMNR 细菌会导致养殖动物患乳腺炎、淋巴结炎和肺炎等疾病,给饲养者造成经济损失,并对公共卫生构成威胁。传统的 CMNR 诊断方法包括在普通或选择性培养基上分离目标细菌,并在实验室生化鉴定系统的协助下进行代谢分析。尽管存在一些挑战,如需要分离细菌,但先进的质谱法也可支持在诊所的日常工作中诊断这些细菌。在一些 CMNR 成员的困难鉴定中,使用聚合酶链反应 (PCR) 的分子方法成为正确鉴定的可靠选择,有时可直接从气管支气管吸出物和粪便等临床样本中进行鉴定。另一方面,针对结核分枝杆菌的皮试或酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)等免疫学诊断方法也能在无细菌生长的亚临床感染中取得良好效果。在本综述中,我们介绍了最常用于诊断 CMNR 致病菌的方法,并讨论了这些方法的优势和局限性,以及在诊断中采用新技术所面临的挑战和前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnosis of bacteria from the CMNR group in farm animals

The CMNR group comprises bacteria of the genera Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Nocardia, and Rhodococcus and share cell wall and DNA content characteristics. Many pathogenic CMNR bacteria cause diseases such as mastitis, lymphadenitis, and pneumonia in farmed animals, which cause economic losses for breeders and represent a threat to public health. Traditional diagnosis in CMNR involves isolating target bacteria on general or selective media and conducting metabolic analyses with the assistance of laboratory biochemical identification systems. Advanced mass spectrometry may also support diagnosing these bacteria in the clinic's daily routine despite some challenges, such as the need for isolated bacteria. In difficult identification among some CMNR members, molecular methods using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) emerge as reliable options for correct specification that is sometimes achieved directly from clinical samples such as tracheobronchial aspirates and feces. On the other hand, immunological diagnostics such as the skin test or Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis yield promising results in subclinical infections with no bacterial growth involved. In this review, we present the methods most commonly used to diagnose pathogenic CMNR bacteria and discuss their advantages and limitations, as well as challenges and perspectives on adopting new technologies in diagnostics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Comparative Immunology, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases aims to respond to the concept of "One Medicine" and to provide a venue for scientific exchange. Based on the concept of "Comparative Medicine" interdisciplinary cooperation between specialists in human and animal medicine is of mutual interest and benefit. Therefore, there is need to combine the respective interest of physicians, veterinarians and other health professionals for comparative studies relevant to either human or animal medicine . The journal is open to subjects of common interest related to the immunology, immunopathology, microbiology, parasitology and epidemiology of human and animal infectious diseases, especially zoonotic infections, and animal models of human infectious diseases. The role of environmental factors in disease emergence is emphasized. CIMID is mainly focusing on applied veterinary and human medicine rather than on fundamental experimental research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信