保护人类的声音：关于规范信函和意见书写作中使用 ChatGPT 的呼吁。

IF 1.4 4区医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1111/ajo.13877

Shigeki Matsubara

{"title":"保护人类的声音：关于规范信函和意见书写作中使用 ChatGPT 的呼吁。","authors":"Shigeki Matsubara","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correspondence and Opinion provide a 'human voice,' serving as the captivating elements that grab readers' attention and stimulate contemplation. The extent of ChatGPT's involvement in writing raises controversy. We tested ChatGPT's capability to generate readable Correspondence or Opinion, producing an English Opinion from a Japanese abstract. We also tasked ChatGPT with creating Correspondence and Reply for an English→German translated Opinion. Opinion, Correspondence, and Reply output here were found to be readable and reasonable. While preliminary, these results suggest that ChatGPT can generate such articles, prompting serious concern about AI taking over the 'human voice.' Some regulatory measures may be needed.","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preserving the human voice: A plea for regulating ChatGPT use in Correspondence and Opinion writing.\",\"authors\":\"Shigeki Matsubara\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.13877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correspondence and Opinion provide a 'human voice,' serving as the captivating elements that grab readers' attention and stimulate contemplation. The extent of ChatGPT's involvement in writing raises controversy. We tested ChatGPT's capability to generate readable Correspondence or Opinion, producing an English Opinion from a Japanese abstract. We also tasked ChatGPT with creating Correspondence and Reply for an English→German translated Opinion. Opinion, Correspondence, and Reply output here were found to be readable and reasonable. While preliminary, these results suggest that ChatGPT can generate such articles, prompting serious concern about AI taking over the 'human voice.' Some regulatory measures may be needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13877\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

通信和意见提供了 "人的声音"，成为吸引读者注意力和激发思考的迷人元素。ChatGPT 参与写作的程度引发了争议。我们测试了 ChatGPT 生成可读的 "通信 "或 "意见 "的能力，从日文摘要中生成了英文 "意见"。我们还让 ChatGPT 为一份英语→德语翻译的意见书创建通信和回复。我们发现这里输出的意见书、信函和回复都具有可读性和合理性。虽然只是初步结果，但这些结果表明 ChatGPT 可以生成此类文章，这引发了人们对人工智能取代 "人类声音 "的严重担忧。可能需要采取一些监管措施。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Preserving the human voice: A plea for regulating ChatGPT use in Correspondence and Opinion writing.

Correspondence and Opinion provide a 'human voice,' serving as the captivating elements that grab readers' attention and stimulate contemplation. The extent of ChatGPT's involvement in writing raises controversy. We tested ChatGPT's capability to generate readable Correspondence or Opinion, producing an English Opinion from a Japanese abstract. We also tasked ChatGPT with creating Correspondence and Reply for an English→German translated Opinion. Opinion, Correspondence, and Reply output here were found to be readable and reasonable. While preliminary, these results suggest that ChatGPT can generate such articles, prompting serious concern about AI taking over the 'human voice.' Some regulatory measures may be needed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 医学-妇产科学

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

11.80%

发文量

165

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.