{"title":"直接测量 DCD 捐献者潜能。","authors":"Tom Mone, Tom Rosenthal, Tom Seto","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing methods of comparing organ procurement organization (OPO) performance use administrative data to indirectly measure donation after circulatory death (DCD). The purpose of this study was to categorize and quantify reasons that potential DCD donors do not progress to donation to facilitate the direct measurement of OPO donor potential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of all 18 685 potential organ donors referred to the organ procurement agency OneLegacy in 2021 and 2022 were reviewed, and reasons that cases did not proceed to donation were categorized and quantified. All hospital deaths were reviewed through tissue referrals and chart audits to assess whether potential organ donors were not referred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 8349 potential DCD donors. Of these, 5640 cases were ruled out for clinical reasons, and 1458 cases were ruled out for factors unique to DCD, such as ventilation, which was never withdrawn. Of the 1251 ruled in for the family approach to donation consent, there were ultimately 191 donors with organs transplanted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OPO donor potential calculated from referral and hospital death record reviews is substantially lower than donor potential determined by administrative data, validating the need for direct measurement for regulatory purposes and performance improvement. For a usable direct measure of donor potential, DCD donor criteria must be codified, electronic donor records optimized, and audit processes developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct Measurement of DCD Donor Potential.\",\"authors\":\"Tom Mone, Tom Rosenthal, Tom Seto\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TP.0000000000005188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing methods of comparing organ procurement organization (OPO) performance use administrative data to indirectly measure donation after circulatory death (DCD). The purpose of this study was to categorize and quantify reasons that potential DCD donors do not progress to donation to facilitate the direct measurement of OPO donor potential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of all 18 685 potential organ donors referred to the organ procurement agency OneLegacy in 2021 and 2022 were reviewed, and reasons that cases did not proceed to donation were categorized and quantified. All hospital deaths were reviewed through tissue referrals and chart audits to assess whether potential organ donors were not referred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 8349 potential DCD donors. Of these, 5640 cases were ruled out for clinical reasons, and 1458 cases were ruled out for factors unique to DCD, such as ventilation, which was never withdrawn. Of the 1251 ruled in for the family approach to donation consent, there were ultimately 191 donors with organs transplanted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OPO donor potential calculated from referral and hospital death record reviews is substantially lower than donor potential determined by administrative data, validating the need for direct measurement for regulatory purposes and performance improvement. For a usable direct measure of donor potential, DCD donor criteria must be codified, electronic donor records optimized, and audit processes developed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005188\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Existing methods of comparing organ procurement organization (OPO) performance use administrative data to indirectly measure donation after circulatory death (DCD). The purpose of this study was to categorize and quantify reasons that potential DCD donors do not progress to donation to facilitate the direct measurement of OPO donor potential.
Methods: Records of all 18 685 potential organ donors referred to the organ procurement agency OneLegacy in 2021 and 2022 were reviewed, and reasons that cases did not proceed to donation were categorized and quantified. All hospital deaths were reviewed through tissue referrals and chart audits to assess whether potential organ donors were not referred.
Results: There were 8349 potential DCD donors. Of these, 5640 cases were ruled out for clinical reasons, and 1458 cases were ruled out for factors unique to DCD, such as ventilation, which was never withdrawn. Of the 1251 ruled in for the family approach to donation consent, there were ultimately 191 donors with organs transplanted.
Conclusions: OPO donor potential calculated from referral and hospital death record reviews is substantially lower than donor potential determined by administrative data, validating the need for direct measurement for regulatory purposes and performance improvement. For a usable direct measure of donor potential, DCD donor criteria must be codified, electronic donor records optimized, and audit processes developed.
期刊介绍：
The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year.
Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal.
Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed.
The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
