Eleanor R Lena, Nikhil S Patil, Marko M Popovic, Arshia Eshtiaghi, Arjan S Dhoot, Rajeev H Muni, Peter J Kertes
{"title":"评估有无辅助巩膜扣带的玻璃体旁切除术,以修复因视网膜下部破损导致的风湿性脱离:系统回顾。","authors":"Eleanor R Lena, Nikhil S Patil, Marko M Popovic, Arshia Eshtiaghi, Arjan S Dhoot, Rajeev H Muni, Peter J Kertes","doi":"10.3928/23258160-20240801-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this systematic review, the efficacy of scleral buckle (SB) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was compared to PPV alone in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) due to inferior retinal breaks (IRB). Measured outcomes included final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anatomic success, and complication rates in randomized controlled trials and observational studies from 2000 to 2022. Among four studies (696 eyes), three studies demonstrated no significant difference between PPV and PPV/SB for final BCVA, whereas one study reported better BCVA with added SB. PPV/SB yielded comparable single-surgery anatomical success (SSAS) and final anatomical success (FAS) in three studies relative to PPV alone (<i>P</i> < 0.05); however, one study reported better SSAS with added SB. Stratifying by lens status revealed a SSAS benefit with PPV/SB in phakic eyes (<i>P</i> = 0.046). No significant difference was seen in complication rates. In conclusion, PPV and PPV/SB were associated with similar functional outcomes and risk profile, whereas SSAS may be improved with PPV/SB in phakic eyes with RRD due to IRB. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2024;55:XX-XX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":19679,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Pars Plana Vitrectomy With and Without Supplemental Scleral Buckle for the Repair of Rhegmatogenous Detachment Due to Inferior Retinal Breaks: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor R Lena, Nikhil S Patil, Marko M Popovic, Arshia Eshtiaghi, Arjan S Dhoot, Rajeev H Muni, Peter J Kertes\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/23258160-20240801-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this systematic review, the efficacy of scleral buckle (SB) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was compared to PPV alone in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) due to inferior retinal breaks (IRB). Measured outcomes included final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anatomic success, and complication rates in randomized controlled trials and observational studies from 2000 to 2022. Among four studies (696 eyes), three studies demonstrated no significant difference between PPV and PPV/SB for final BCVA, whereas one study reported better BCVA with added SB. PPV/SB yielded comparable single-surgery anatomical success (SSAS) and final anatomical success (FAS) in three studies relative to PPV alone (<i>P</i> < 0.05); however, one study reported better SSAS with added SB. Stratifying by lens status revealed a SSAS benefit with PPV/SB in phakic eyes (<i>P</i> = 0.046). No significant difference was seen in complication rates. In conclusion, PPV and PPV/SB were associated with similar functional outcomes and risk profile, whereas SSAS may be improved with PPV/SB in phakic eyes with RRD due to IRB. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2024;55:XX-XX.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240801-02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240801-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Pars Plana Vitrectomy With and Without Supplemental Scleral Buckle for the Repair of Rhegmatogenous Detachment Due to Inferior Retinal Breaks: A Systematic Review.
In this systematic review, the efficacy of scleral buckle (SB) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was compared to PPV alone in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) due to inferior retinal breaks (IRB). Measured outcomes included final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anatomic success, and complication rates in randomized controlled trials and observational studies from 2000 to 2022. Among four studies (696 eyes), three studies demonstrated no significant difference between PPV and PPV/SB for final BCVA, whereas one study reported better BCVA with added SB. PPV/SB yielded comparable single-surgery anatomical success (SSAS) and final anatomical success (FAS) in three studies relative to PPV alone (P < 0.05); however, one study reported better SSAS with added SB. Stratifying by lens status revealed a SSAS benefit with PPV/SB in phakic eyes (P = 0.046). No significant difference was seen in complication rates. In conclusion, PPV and PPV/SB were associated with similar functional outcomes and risk profile, whereas SSAS may be improved with PPV/SB in phakic eyes with RRD due to IRB. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:XX-XX.].
期刊介绍:
OSLI Retina focuses exclusively on retinal diseases, surgery and pharmacotherapy. OSLI Retina will offer an expedited submission to publication effort of peer-reviewed clinical science and case report articles. The front of the journal offers practical clinical and practice management features and columns specific to retina specialists. In sum, readers will find important peer-reviewed retina articles and the latest findings in techniques and science, as well as informative business and practice management features in one journal.