髓鞘寡突胶质细胞蛋白抗体相关性视神经炎的 OCT 眼间差指标诊断价值。

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Giulio Volpe, Neringa Jurkute, Gabriela Girafa, Hanna G Zimmermann, Seyedamirhosein Motamedi, Charlotte Bereuter, Lekha Pandit, Anitha D'Cunha, Michael R Yeaman, Terry J Smith, Lawrence J Cook, Alexander U Brandt, Friedemann Paul, Axel Petzold, Frederike C Oertel
{"title":"髓鞘寡突胶质细胞蛋白抗体相关性视神经炎的 OCT 眼间差指标诊断价值。","authors":"Giulio Volpe, Neringa Jurkute, Gabriela Girafa, Hanna G Zimmermann, Seyedamirhosein Motamedi, Charlotte Bereuter, Lekha Pandit, Anitha D'Cunha, Michael R Yeaman, Terry J Smith, Lawrence J Cook, Alexander U Brandt, Friedemann Paul, Axel Petzold, Frederike C Oertel","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The 2022 International Consortium for Optic Neuritis diagnostic criteria for optic neuritis (ON) include optical coherence tomography (OCT). The diagnostic value of intereye difference (IED) metrics is high for ON in patients with multiple sclerosis and aquaporin-4 antibody seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, but unknown in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated ON (MOG-ON).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter validation study was conducted on the published IED cutoff values (>4% or >4 μm in the macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer [mGCIP] or >5% or >5 μm in the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer [pRNFL]) in individuals with MOG-ON and age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Structural data were acquired with Spectralis spectral-domain OCT >6 months after ON. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics for both intereye percentage (IEPD) and absolute difference (IEAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 66 individuals were included (MOG-ON N = 33; HCs N = 33). ON was unilateral in 20 and bilateral in 13 subjects. In the pooled analysis, the mGCIP IEPD was most sensitive (92%), followed by the mGCIP IEAD (88%) and pRNFL (84%). The same pattern was found for the specificity (mGCIP IEPD 82%, IEAD 82%; pRNFL IEPD 82%, IEAD 79%).In subgroup analyses, the diagnostic sensitivity was higher in subjects with unilateral ON (>99% for all metrics) compared with bilateral ON (61%-78%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In individuals with MOG-ON, the diagnostic accuracy of OCT-based IED metrics for ON was high, especially of mGCIP IEPD.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This study provides Class III evidence that the intereye difference on OCT can distinguish between those with MOG and normal controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":19472,"journal":{"name":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","volume":"11 6","pages":"e200291"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of Inter-Eye Difference Metrics on OCT for Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Optic Neuritis.\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Volpe, Neringa Jurkute, Gabriela Girafa, Hanna G Zimmermann, Seyedamirhosein Motamedi, Charlotte Bereuter, Lekha Pandit, Anitha D'Cunha, Michael R Yeaman, Terry J Smith, Lawrence J Cook, Alexander U Brandt, Friedemann Paul, Axel Petzold, Frederike C Oertel\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The 2022 International Consortium for Optic Neuritis diagnostic criteria for optic neuritis (ON) include optical coherence tomography (OCT). The diagnostic value of intereye difference (IED) metrics is high for ON in patients with multiple sclerosis and aquaporin-4 antibody seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, but unknown in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated ON (MOG-ON).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter validation study was conducted on the published IED cutoff values (>4% or >4 μm in the macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer [mGCIP] or >5% or >5 μm in the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer [pRNFL]) in individuals with MOG-ON and age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Structural data were acquired with Spectralis spectral-domain OCT >6 months after ON. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics for both intereye percentage (IEPD) and absolute difference (IEAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 66 individuals were included (MOG-ON N = 33; HCs N = 33). ON was unilateral in 20 and bilateral in 13 subjects. In the pooled analysis, the mGCIP IEPD was most sensitive (92%), followed by the mGCIP IEAD (88%) and pRNFL (84%). The same pattern was found for the specificity (mGCIP IEPD 82%, IEAD 82%; pRNFL IEPD 82%, IEAD 79%).In subgroup analyses, the diagnostic sensitivity was higher in subjects with unilateral ON (>99% for all metrics) compared with bilateral ON (61%-78%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In individuals with MOG-ON, the diagnostic accuracy of OCT-based IED metrics for ON was high, especially of mGCIP IEPD.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This study provides Class III evidence that the intereye difference on OCT can distinguish between those with MOG and normal controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"volume\":\"11 6\",\"pages\":\"e200291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200291\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:2022年国际视神经炎联盟的视神经炎(ON)诊断标准包括光学相干断层扫描(OCT)。眼内差(IED)指标对多发性硬化症和水肿素-4抗体血清阳性的神经性视脊髓炎谱系障碍患者的视神经炎诊断价值很高,但对髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白抗体相关性视神经炎(MOG-ON)的诊断价值尚不清楚:对已公布的 IED 临界值(黄斑神经节细胞和丛状内层 [mGCIP] >4% 或 >4 μm,或毛细血管周围视网膜神经纤维层 [pRNFL] >5% 或 >5 μm)在 MOG-ON 患者和年龄与性别匹配的健康对照组(HCs)中进行了多中心验证研究。结构数据是在MOG-ON发生后6个月以上使用Spectralis光谱域OCT采集的。我们计算了眼内百分比(IEPD)和绝对差异(IEAD)的敏感性、特异性和接收器操作特性:结果:共纳入 66 人(MOG-ON N = 33;HCs N = 33)。20名受试者为单侧ON,13名受试者为双侧ON。在汇总分析中,mGCIP IEPD 的灵敏度最高(92%),其次是 mGCIP IEAD(88%)和 pRNFL(84%)。在亚组分析中,与双侧ON(61%-78%)相比,单侧ON受试者的诊断灵敏度更高(所有指标均大于99%):讨论:在MOG-ON患者中,基于OCT的IED指标对ON的诊断准确率很高,尤其是mGCIP IEPD:本研究提供了III级证据,证明OCT上的眼内差异可以区分MOG患者和正常对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Value of Inter-Eye Difference Metrics on OCT for Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Optic Neuritis.

Background and objectives: The 2022 International Consortium for Optic Neuritis diagnostic criteria for optic neuritis (ON) include optical coherence tomography (OCT). The diagnostic value of intereye difference (IED) metrics is high for ON in patients with multiple sclerosis and aquaporin-4 antibody seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, but unknown in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated ON (MOG-ON).

Methods: A multicenter validation study was conducted on the published IED cutoff values (>4% or >4 μm in the macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer [mGCIP] or >5% or >5 μm in the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer [pRNFL]) in individuals with MOG-ON and age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Structural data were acquired with Spectralis spectral-domain OCT >6 months after ON. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics for both intereye percentage (IEPD) and absolute difference (IEAD).

Results: A total of 66 individuals were included (MOG-ON N = 33; HCs N = 33). ON was unilateral in 20 and bilateral in 13 subjects. In the pooled analysis, the mGCIP IEPD was most sensitive (92%), followed by the mGCIP IEAD (88%) and pRNFL (84%). The same pattern was found for the specificity (mGCIP IEPD 82%, IEAD 82%; pRNFL IEPD 82%, IEAD 79%).In subgroup analyses, the diagnostic sensitivity was higher in subjects with unilateral ON (>99% for all metrics) compared with bilateral ON (61%-78%).

Discussion: In individuals with MOG-ON, the diagnostic accuracy of OCT-based IED metrics for ON was high, especially of mGCIP IEPD.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that the intereye difference on OCT can distinguish between those with MOG and normal controls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation is an official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation will be the premier peer-reviewed journal in neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. This journal publishes rigorously peer-reviewed open-access reports of original research and in-depth reviews of topics in neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, affecting the full range of neurologic diseases including (but not limited to) Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, tauopathy, and stroke; multiple sclerosis and NMO; inflammatory peripheral nerve and muscle disease, Guillain-Barré and myasthenia gravis; nervous system infection; paraneoplastic syndromes, noninfectious encephalitides and other antibody-mediated disorders; and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical trials, instructive case reports, and small case series will also be featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信