南卡罗来纳州确诊的妊娠糖尿病患病率不断上升:2015-2021 年。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of women's health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2023.1042
Kelly J Hunt, Chun-Che Wen, Brian Neelon, Dulaney A Wilson, Julio Mateus, John Pearce, Kalyan Chundru, Sarah Simpson, Jeffrey E Korte, Hermes Florez, Angela M Malek
{"title":"南卡罗来纳州确诊的妊娠糖尿病患病率不断上升:2015-2021 年。","authors":"Kelly J Hunt, Chun-Che Wen, Brian Neelon, Dulaney A Wilson, Julio Mateus, John Pearce, Kalyan Chundru, Sarah Simpson, Jeffrey E Korte, Hermes Florez, Angela M Malek","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.1042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To examine trends with a focus on racial and ethnic disparities in reported gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and related outcomes (macrosomia, large for gestational age infants) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina (SC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective cohort study of pregnancies resulting in livebirths from 2015 through 2021 was conducted in SC. Statewide maternal hospital and emergency department discharge codes were linked to birth certificate data. GDM was defined by ICD-9-CM (i.e., 648.01-648.02, 648.81-648.82) or ICD-10-CM codes (i.e., O24.4, O24.1, O24.9), or indication of GDM on the birth certificate without evidence of diabetes outside pregnancy (ICD-9-CM: 250.xx; ICD-10-CM: E10, E11, O24.0, O24.1, O24.3). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Our study included 194,777 non-Hispanic White (White), 108,165 non-Hispanic Black (Black), 25,556 Hispanic, and 16,344 other race-ethnic group pregnancies. The relative risk for GDM associated with a 1-year increase was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.02) before the pandemic and 1.12 (1.09-1.14) during the pandemic. While there were race-ethnic differences in the prevalence of GDM, increasing trends were similar across all race-ethnic groups before and during the pandemic. From quarter 1, 2020, to quarter 4, 2021, the prevalence of reported GDM increased from 8.92% to 10.85% in White, from 8.04% to 9.78% in Black, from 11.2% to 13.65% in Hispanic, and from 13.3% to 16.16% in other race-ethnic women. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> An increasing prevalence of diagnosed GDM was reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying increasing trends, to develop interventions, and to determine whether the increasing trend continues in subsequent years.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"1518-1527"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing Prevalence of Diagnosed Gestational Diabetes in South Carolina: 2015-2021.\",\"authors\":\"Kelly J Hunt, Chun-Che Wen, Brian Neelon, Dulaney A Wilson, Julio Mateus, John Pearce, Kalyan Chundru, Sarah Simpson, Jeffrey E Korte, Hermes Florez, Angela M Malek\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jwh.2023.1042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To examine trends with a focus on racial and ethnic disparities in reported gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and related outcomes (macrosomia, large for gestational age infants) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina (SC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective cohort study of pregnancies resulting in livebirths from 2015 through 2021 was conducted in SC. Statewide maternal hospital and emergency department discharge codes were linked to birth certificate data. GDM was defined by ICD-9-CM (i.e., 648.01-648.02, 648.81-648.82) or ICD-10-CM codes (i.e., O24.4, O24.1, O24.9), or indication of GDM on the birth certificate without evidence of diabetes outside pregnancy (ICD-9-CM: 250.xx; ICD-10-CM: E10, E11, O24.0, O24.1, O24.3). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Our study included 194,777 non-Hispanic White (White), 108,165 non-Hispanic Black (Black), 25,556 Hispanic, and 16,344 other race-ethnic group pregnancies. The relative risk for GDM associated with a 1-year increase was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.02) before the pandemic and 1.12 (1.09-1.14) during the pandemic. While there were race-ethnic differences in the prevalence of GDM, increasing trends were similar across all race-ethnic groups before and during the pandemic. From quarter 1, 2020, to quarter 4, 2021, the prevalence of reported GDM increased from 8.92% to 10.85% in White, from 8.04% to 9.78% in Black, from 11.2% to 13.65% in Hispanic, and from 13.3% to 16.16% in other race-ethnic women. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> An increasing prevalence of diagnosed GDM was reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying increasing trends, to develop interventions, and to determine whether the increasing trend continues in subsequent years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1518-1527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.1042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.1042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:研究南卡罗来纳州 (South Carolina, SC) COVID-19 大流行之前和期间妊娠期糖尿病 (GDM) 报告及相关结果(巨大儿、胎龄过大婴儿)的种族和民族差异趋势。研究方法:在南卡罗来纳州开展了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是 2015 年至 2021 年期间活产的孕妇。全州孕产妇医院和急诊科出院代码与出生证明数据相链接。GDM由ICD-9-CM代码(即648.01-648.02、648.81-648.82)或ICD-10-CM代码(即O24.4、O24.1、O24.9)定义,或出生证明上显示为GDM但无妊娠外糖尿病证据(ICD-9-CM:250.xx;ICD-10-CM:E10、E11、O24.0、O24.1、O24.3)。研究结果我们的研究包括 194,777 例非西班牙裔白人(白人)妊娠、108,165 例非西班牙裔黑人(黑人)妊娠、25,556 例西班牙裔妊娠和 16,344 例其他种族妊娠。大流行前,GDM 相对风险增加 1 年为 1.01(95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.01-1.02),大流行期间为 1.12(1.09-1.14)。虽然 GDM 患病率存在种族-民族差异,但在大流行之前和期间,所有种族-民族群体的患病率增长趋势相似。从 2020 年第 1 季度到 2021 年第 4 季度,报告的 GDM 患病率在白人中从 8.92% 上升到 10.85%,在黑人中从 8.04% 上升到 9.78%,在西班牙裔女性中从 11.2% 上升到 13.65%,在其他种族女性中从 13.3% 上升到 16.16%。结论据报道,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,确诊的 GDM 患病率不断上升。今后需要开展研究,以了解增长趋势背后的机制,制定干预措施,并确定这种增长趋势是否会在随后几年持续下去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing Prevalence of Diagnosed Gestational Diabetes in South Carolina: 2015-2021.

Objective: To examine trends with a focus on racial and ethnic disparities in reported gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and related outcomes (macrosomia, large for gestational age infants) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina (SC). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of pregnancies resulting in livebirths from 2015 through 2021 was conducted in SC. Statewide maternal hospital and emergency department discharge codes were linked to birth certificate data. GDM was defined by ICD-9-CM (i.e., 648.01-648.02, 648.81-648.82) or ICD-10-CM codes (i.e., O24.4, O24.1, O24.9), or indication of GDM on the birth certificate without evidence of diabetes outside pregnancy (ICD-9-CM: 250.xx; ICD-10-CM: E10, E11, O24.0, O24.1, O24.3). Results: Our study included 194,777 non-Hispanic White (White), 108,165 non-Hispanic Black (Black), 25,556 Hispanic, and 16,344 other race-ethnic group pregnancies. The relative risk for GDM associated with a 1-year increase was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.02) before the pandemic and 1.12 (1.09-1.14) during the pandemic. While there were race-ethnic differences in the prevalence of GDM, increasing trends were similar across all race-ethnic groups before and during the pandemic. From quarter 1, 2020, to quarter 4, 2021, the prevalence of reported GDM increased from 8.92% to 10.85% in White, from 8.04% to 9.78% in Black, from 11.2% to 13.65% in Hispanic, and from 13.3% to 16.16% in other race-ethnic women. Conclusion: An increasing prevalence of diagnosed GDM was reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying increasing trends, to develop interventions, and to determine whether the increasing trend continues in subsequent years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信