多发性硬化症患者接种疫苗的安全性和有效性:系统综述。

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
O E Santangelo, S Provenzano, C Vella, S Fermi, L Facchini, M Rizzo, F Brighina, F Cedrone, A Firenze
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者接种疫苗的安全性和有效性:系统综述。","authors":"O E Santangelo, S Provenzano, C Vella, S Fermi, L Facchini, M Rizzo, F Brighina, F Cedrone, A Firenze","doi":"10.26355/eurrev_202408_36670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to show the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of vaccinations in patients with multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted following the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the review process, 133 studies were included; the bibliographic search was conducted on PubMed/Medline and Scopus, combining free text and words.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In general, vaccinations do not seem to aggravate multiple sclerosis (MS) or increase the probability of relapse, particularly for inactivated vaccines and, in general, for the rest of the vaccines. However, it is advisable, especially for vaccines with a live attenuated virus, to carefully evaluate the risks and benefits of these vaccinations; as regards the effectiveness in relation to the drug taken, there is great variability in response. In particular, vaccinations are less effective in patients undergoing therapy with anti-CD20 and S1P modulators. At the same time, a small response is likely to be better than none. Whenever possible, vaccinations should be offered and recommended to patients with multiple sclerosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12152,"journal":{"name":"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of vaccinations in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"O E Santangelo, S Provenzano, C Vella, S Fermi, L Facchini, M Rizzo, F Brighina, F Cedrone, A Firenze\",\"doi\":\"10.26355/eurrev_202408_36670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to show the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of vaccinations in patients with multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted following the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the review process, 133 studies were included; the bibliographic search was conducted on PubMed/Medline and Scopus, combining free text and words.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In general, vaccinations do not seem to aggravate multiple sclerosis (MS) or increase the probability of relapse, particularly for inactivated vaccines and, in general, for the rest of the vaccines. However, it is advisable, especially for vaccines with a live attenuated virus, to carefully evaluate the risks and benefits of these vaccinations; as regards the effectiveness in relation to the drug taken, there is great variability in response. In particular, vaccinations are less effective in patients undergoing therapy with anti-CD20 and S1P modulators. At the same time, a small response is likely to be better than none. Whenever possible, vaccinations should be offered and recommended to patients with multiple sclerosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202408_36670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202408_36670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在说明多发性硬化症患者接种疫苗的疗效/有效性和安全性:本系统性综述遵循 Cochrane 协作组织的指南和流行病学观察性研究荟萃分析(MOOSE)进行:综述过程结束时,共纳入了 133 项研究;文献检索在 PubMedline 和 Scopus 上进行,结合了自由文本和文字:总的来说,接种疫苗似乎不会加重多发性硬化症(MS)的病情或增加复发几率,尤其是灭活疫苗,其他疫苗也是如此。不过,最好还是仔细评估接种这些疫苗的风险和益处,尤其是接种减毒活疫苗;至于接种疫苗的效果与所服用的药物之间的关系,则存在很大的差异。特别是,正在接受抗 CD20 和 S1P 调节剂治疗的患者接种疫苗的效果较差。同时,反应小可能比没有反应要好。只要有可能,就应向多发性硬化症患者提供和推荐疫苗接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of vaccinations in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

Objective: The study aims to show the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of vaccinations in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Materials and methods: This systematic review was conducted following the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE).

Results: At the end of the review process, 133 studies were included; the bibliographic search was conducted on PubMed/Medline and Scopus, combining free text and words.

Conclusions: In general, vaccinations do not seem to aggravate multiple sclerosis (MS) or increase the probability of relapse, particularly for inactivated vaccines and, in general, for the rest of the vaccines. However, it is advisable, especially for vaccines with a live attenuated virus, to carefully evaluate the risks and benefits of these vaccinations; as regards the effectiveness in relation to the drug taken, there is great variability in response. In particular, vaccinations are less effective in patients undergoing therapy with anti-CD20 and S1P modulators. At the same time, a small response is likely to be better than none. Whenever possible, vaccinations should be offered and recommended to patients with multiple sclerosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
906
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, a fortnightly journal, acts as an information exchange tool on several aspects of medical and pharmacological sciences. It publishes reviews, original articles, and results from original research. The purposes of the Journal are to encourage interdisciplinary discussions and to contribute to the advancement of medicine. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences includes: -Editorials- Reviews- Original articles- Trials- Brief communications- Case reports (only if of particular interest and accompanied by a short review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信