Maria Teresa Passarelli, Matthieu Petit, Roberta Garberi, Guillaume Lebreton, Charles Edouard Luyt, Marc Pineton De Chambrun, Juliette Chommeloux, Guillaume Hékimian, Emanuele Rezoagli, Giuseppe Foti, Alain Combes, Marco Giani, Matthieu Schmidt
{"title":"静脉体外膜肺氧合断流期间的机械通气设置。","authors":"Maria Teresa Passarelli, Matthieu Petit, Roberta Garberi, Guillaume Lebreton, Charles Edouard Luyt, Marc Pineton De Chambrun, Juliette Chommeloux, Guillaume Hékimian, Emanuele Rezoagli, Giuseppe Foti, Alain Combes, Marco Giani, Matthieu Schmidt","doi":"10.1186/s13613-024-01359-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing of weaning from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) and its modalities have been rarely studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, multicenter cohort study over 7 years in two tertiary ICUs, high-volume ECMO centers in France and Italy. Patients with ARDS on ECMO and successfully weaned from VV ECMO were classified based on their mechanical ventilation modality during the sweep gas-off trial (SGOT) with either controlled mechanical ventilation or spontaneous breathing (i.e. pressure support ventilation). The primary endpoint was the time to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation within 90 days post-ECMO weaning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>292 adult patients with severe ARDS were weaned from controlled ventilation, and 101 were on spontaneous breathing during SGOT. The 90-day probability of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation was not significantly different between the two groups (sHR [95% CI], 1.23 [0.84-1.82]). ECMO-related complications were not statistically different between patients receiving these two mechanical ventilation strategies. After adjusting for covariates, older age, higher pre-ECMO sequential organ failure assessment score, pneumothorax, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and renal replacement therapy, but not mechanical ventilation modalities during SGOT, were independently associated with a lower probability of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation after ECMO weaning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Time to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation within 90 days post-ECMO was not associated with the mechanical ventilation strategy used during SGOT. Further research is needed to assess the optimal ventilation strategy during weaning off VV ECMO and its impact on short- and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"14 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical ventilation settings during weaning from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Teresa Passarelli, Matthieu Petit, Roberta Garberi, Guillaume Lebreton, Charles Edouard Luyt, Marc Pineton De Chambrun, Juliette Chommeloux, Guillaume Hékimian, Emanuele Rezoagli, Giuseppe Foti, Alain Combes, Marco Giani, Matthieu Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13613-024-01359-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing of weaning from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) and its modalities have been rarely studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, multicenter cohort study over 7 years in two tertiary ICUs, high-volume ECMO centers in France and Italy. Patients with ARDS on ECMO and successfully weaned from VV ECMO were classified based on their mechanical ventilation modality during the sweep gas-off trial (SGOT) with either controlled mechanical ventilation or spontaneous breathing (i.e. pressure support ventilation). The primary endpoint was the time to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation within 90 days post-ECMO weaning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>292 adult patients with severe ARDS were weaned from controlled ventilation, and 101 were on spontaneous breathing during SGOT. The 90-day probability of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation was not significantly different between the two groups (sHR [95% CI], 1.23 [0.84-1.82]). ECMO-related complications were not statistically different between patients receiving these two mechanical ventilation strategies. After adjusting for covariates, older age, higher pre-ECMO sequential organ failure assessment score, pneumothorax, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and renal replacement therapy, but not mechanical ventilation modalities during SGOT, were independently associated with a lower probability of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation after ECMO weaning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Time to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation within 90 days post-ECMO was not associated with the mechanical ventilation strategy used during SGOT. Further research is needed to assess the optimal ventilation strategy during weaning off VV ECMO and its impact on short- and long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374948/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01359-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01359-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mechanical ventilation settings during weaning from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Background: The optimal timing of weaning from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) and its modalities have been rarely studied.
Methods: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study over 7 years in two tertiary ICUs, high-volume ECMO centers in France and Italy. Patients with ARDS on ECMO and successfully weaned from VV ECMO were classified based on their mechanical ventilation modality during the sweep gas-off trial (SGOT) with either controlled mechanical ventilation or spontaneous breathing (i.e. pressure support ventilation). The primary endpoint was the time to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation within 90 days post-ECMO weaning.
Results: 292 adult patients with severe ARDS were weaned from controlled ventilation, and 101 were on spontaneous breathing during SGOT. The 90-day probability of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation was not significantly different between the two groups (sHR [95% CI], 1.23 [0.84-1.82]). ECMO-related complications were not statistically different between patients receiving these two mechanical ventilation strategies. After adjusting for covariates, older age, higher pre-ECMO sequential organ failure assessment score, pneumothorax, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and renal replacement therapy, but not mechanical ventilation modalities during SGOT, were independently associated with a lower probability of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation after ECMO weaning.
Conclusions: Time to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation within 90 days post-ECMO was not associated with the mechanical ventilation strategy used during SGOT. Further research is needed to assess the optimal ventilation strategy during weaning off VV ECMO and its impact on short- and long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.