Charles Maquet , Mathieu Evrard , Thibaut Pressat Laffouilhere , Marion Lacassin , Lara Nokovitch , Jean-Paul Marie , Neil Ben Slama , Frederic Crampon , Sophie Deneuve
{"title":"使用倾向性评分对二氧化碳激光和超声波谐波手术刀治疗禅克氏憩室进行内窥镜治疗的比较分析:回顾性观察研究","authors":"Charles Maquet , Mathieu Evrard , Thibaut Pressat Laffouilhere , Marion Lacassin , Lara Nokovitch , Jean-Paul Marie , Neil Ben Slama , Frederic Crampon , Sophie Deneuve","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is a progressive condition that can cause dysphagia and aspiration. Endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (ECPM) is the gold standard treatment for ZD, but there are various techniques available. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the ultrasonic harmonic scalpel (UHS) versus the CO2 laser (CO2L) for ECPM in ZD.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>We led an observational study. The main composite outcome consisted in persistence of postoperative dysphagia OR recurrence/reoperation of symptomatic ZD within two years postoperatively. Surgery was considered effective when no dysphagia within two years postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of acute mediastinitis within 72 h postoperatively. A propensity score was built to adjust for differences observed between non-randomized groups. Additional sensitivity analyses were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>All patients with ECPM surgery for ZD were included from 2011 to 2018 in a single tertiary center. Patients with failure of endoscopic exposition were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>The study included 86 patients who underwent ECPM with either the CO2L (<em>n</em> = 53) or UHS (<em>n</em> = 33) technique. ZD size and other demographic variables were comparable between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>UHS had superior efficacy compared to CO2L (relative risk of failure = 0.29; 95 % confidence interval: 0.05–1.0; <em>p</em> = 0.05), but there was a higher incidence of mediastinitis in the UHS group (12 % vs. 4 %), although this was not statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><p>The UHS technique appears to be an effective technique for ECPM in ZD patients but its safety remains to explore by further larger studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"45 6","pages":"Article 104435"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of CO2 laser and ultracision harmonic scalpel for endoscopic treatment of Zenker's diverticulum using a propensity score: A retrospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"Charles Maquet , Mathieu Evrard , Thibaut Pressat Laffouilhere , Marion Lacassin , Lara Nokovitch , Jean-Paul Marie , Neil Ben Slama , Frederic Crampon , Sophie Deneuve\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is a progressive condition that can cause dysphagia and aspiration. Endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (ECPM) is the gold standard treatment for ZD, but there are various techniques available. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the ultrasonic harmonic scalpel (UHS) versus the CO2 laser (CO2L) for ECPM in ZD.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>We led an observational study. The main composite outcome consisted in persistence of postoperative dysphagia OR recurrence/reoperation of symptomatic ZD within two years postoperatively. Surgery was considered effective when no dysphagia within two years postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of acute mediastinitis within 72 h postoperatively. A propensity score was built to adjust for differences observed between non-randomized groups. Additional sensitivity analyses were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>All patients with ECPM surgery for ZD were included from 2011 to 2018 in a single tertiary center. Patients with failure of endoscopic exposition were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>The study included 86 patients who underwent ECPM with either the CO2L (<em>n</em> = 53) or UHS (<em>n</em> = 33) technique. ZD size and other demographic variables were comparable between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>UHS had superior efficacy compared to CO2L (relative risk of failure = 0.29; 95 % confidence interval: 0.05–1.0; <em>p</em> = 0.05), but there was a higher incidence of mediastinitis in the UHS group (12 % vs. 4 %), although this was not statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><p>The UHS technique appears to be an effective technique for ECPM in ZD patients but its safety remains to explore by further larger studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 104435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002217\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of CO2 laser and ultracision harmonic scalpel for endoscopic treatment of Zenker's diverticulum using a propensity score: A retrospective observational study
Objectives
Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is a progressive condition that can cause dysphagia and aspiration. Endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (ECPM) is the gold standard treatment for ZD, but there are various techniques available. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the ultrasonic harmonic scalpel (UHS) versus the CO2 laser (CO2L) for ECPM in ZD.
Design
We led an observational study. The main composite outcome consisted in persistence of postoperative dysphagia OR recurrence/reoperation of symptomatic ZD within two years postoperatively. Surgery was considered effective when no dysphagia within two years postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of acute mediastinitis within 72 h postoperatively. A propensity score was built to adjust for differences observed between non-randomized groups. Additional sensitivity analyses were performed.
Setting
All patients with ECPM surgery for ZD were included from 2011 to 2018 in a single tertiary center. Patients with failure of endoscopic exposition were excluded.
Participants
The study included 86 patients who underwent ECPM with either the CO2L (n = 53) or UHS (n = 33) technique. ZD size and other demographic variables were comparable between the groups.
Main outcome measures
UHS had superior efficacy compared to CO2L (relative risk of failure = 0.29; 95 % confidence interval: 0.05–1.0; p = 0.05), but there was a higher incidence of mediastinitis in the UHS group (12 % vs. 4 %), although this was not statistically significant.
Results and conclusion
The UHS technique appears to be an effective technique for ECPM in ZD patients but its safety remains to explore by further larger studies.
期刊介绍:
Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.