龋齿导致牙髓受累的临床后果对儿童和青少年口腔健康相关生活质量的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Caries Research Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1159/000541027
Patricia Papoula Gorni Reis, Roberta Costa Jorge, Guido Artemio Marañón-Vásquez, Tatiana Kelly da Silva Fidalgo, Lucianne Cople Maia, Vera Mendes Soviero
{"title":"龋齿导致牙髓受累的临床后果对儿童和青少年口腔健康相关生活质量的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Patricia Papoula Gorni Reis, Roberta Costa Jorge, Guido Artemio Marañón-Vásquez, Tatiana Kelly da Silva Fidalgo, Lucianne Cople Maia, Vera Mendes Soviero","doi":"10.1159/000541027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dental caries with pulp involvement potentially impacts the oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether clinical consequences of pulp involvement due to dental caries impacts OHRQoL of children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational studies evaluating children/adolescents (Population) with pulp involvement due to caries (Exposition) compared with those without it (Comparison) have more negative impact on their OHRQoL (Outcome). A systematic search was undertaken in August 2022 in seven databases. Alerts were set until August 2023. JBI Critical Appraisal toll for cross-sectional studies was used for methodological quality assessment. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) of impact on OHRQoL. For studies with dichotomous outcome, meta-analysis calculated the odds ratio (OR). Robustness, heterogeneity, certainty of evidence, and publication bias were evaluated. Confidence interval was 95%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 29 included studies, 14 assessed preschoolers, nine assessed schoolchildren, four assessed adolescents, and two assessed children/adolescents. PUFA was the main index used to assess the exposure. ECOHIS (preschoolers) and CPQ (children/adolescents) were the main tools used to assess the outcome. Only five articles fully adhered to the quality criteria. The meta-analyses found the following main results: a) preschoolers: MD -10.79 (-16.50; -5.09); b) schoolchildren: MD -5.12 (-7.51; -2.72); c) adolescents: MD -1.86 (-4.59; 0.87); d) overall impact: SMD -2.18; (CI: -3.21;-1.15) and OR 0.52 (CI: 0.30; 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pulp involvement impacted OHRQoL of children negatively. In adolescents, this impact was not observed. Results must be interpreted with caution due to very low certainty of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of clinical consequences of pulp involvement due to caries on oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Papoula Gorni Reis, Roberta Costa Jorge, Guido Artemio Marañón-Vásquez, Tatiana Kelly da Silva Fidalgo, Lucianne Cople Maia, Vera Mendes Soviero\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dental caries with pulp involvement potentially impacts the oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether clinical consequences of pulp involvement due to dental caries impacts OHRQoL of children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational studies evaluating children/adolescents (Population) with pulp involvement due to caries (Exposition) compared with those without it (Comparison) have more negative impact on their OHRQoL (Outcome). A systematic search was undertaken in August 2022 in seven databases. Alerts were set until August 2023. JBI Critical Appraisal toll for cross-sectional studies was used for methodological quality assessment. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) of impact on OHRQoL. For studies with dichotomous outcome, meta-analysis calculated the odds ratio (OR). Robustness, heterogeneity, certainty of evidence, and publication bias were evaluated. Confidence interval was 95%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 29 included studies, 14 assessed preschoolers, nine assessed schoolchildren, four assessed adolescents, and two assessed children/adolescents. PUFA was the main index used to assess the exposure. ECOHIS (preschoolers) and CPQ (children/adolescents) were the main tools used to assess the outcome. Only five articles fully adhered to the quality criteria. The meta-analyses found the following main results: a) preschoolers: MD -10.79 (-16.50; -5.09); b) schoolchildren: MD -5.12 (-7.51; -2.72); c) adolescents: MD -1.86 (-4.59; 0.87); d) overall impact: SMD -2.18; (CI: -3.21;-1.15) and OR 0.52 (CI: 0.30; 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pulp involvement impacted OHRQoL of children negatively. In adolescents, this impact was not observed. Results must be interpreted with caution due to very low certainty of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caries Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:牙髓受累的龋齿可能会影响口腔健康相关的生活质量(OHRQoL)。这项荟萃分析旨在评估龋齿导致牙髓受累的临床后果是否会影响儿童和青少年的 OHRQoL:观察性研究评估了因龋齿导致牙髓受累(暴露)的儿童/青少年(人群)与无龋齿导致牙髓受累(对比)的儿童/青少年(人群)相比,对他们的 OHRQoL(结果)产生了更多负面影响。2022 年 8 月在七个数据库中进行了系统检索。警报设置至 2023 年 8 月。方法学质量评估采用了JBI横断面研究批判性评估收费标准。随机效应荟萃分析用于计算对 OHRQoL 影响的平均差 (MD) 或标准化平均差 (SMD)。对于结果为二分法的研究,荟萃分析计算的是几率比(OR)。对稳健性、异质性、证据确定性和发表偏倚进行了评估。置信区间为 95%:在纳入的 29 项研究中,14 项研究对学龄前儿童进行了评估,9 项研究对学龄儿童进行了评估,4 项研究对青少年进行了评估,2 项研究对儿童/青少年进行了评估。PUFA是评估暴露的主要指标。ECOHIS(学龄前儿童)和 CPQ(儿童/青少年)是评估结果的主要工具。只有五篇文章完全符合质量标准。荟萃分析得出以下主要结果:a) 学龄前儿童:MD -10.79 (-16.50; -5.09);b) 学龄儿童:MD -5.12 (-7.51; -2.72); c) 青少年:MD -1.86 (-4.59; 0.87); d) 总体影响:SMD:-2.18;(CI:-3.21;-1.15),OR:0.52(CI:0.30;0.90):结论:牙髓受累对儿童的 OHRQoL 有负面影响。结论:牙髓受累对儿童的 OHRQoL 有负面影响,而对青少年则没有这种影响。由于证据的确定性很低,因此必须谨慎解释结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of clinical consequences of pulp involvement due to caries on oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Dental caries with pulp involvement potentially impacts the oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether clinical consequences of pulp involvement due to dental caries impacts OHRQoL of children and adolescents.

Methods: Observational studies evaluating children/adolescents (Population) with pulp involvement due to caries (Exposition) compared with those without it (Comparison) have more negative impact on their OHRQoL (Outcome). A systematic search was undertaken in August 2022 in seven databases. Alerts were set until August 2023. JBI Critical Appraisal toll for cross-sectional studies was used for methodological quality assessment. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) of impact on OHRQoL. For studies with dichotomous outcome, meta-analysis calculated the odds ratio (OR). Robustness, heterogeneity, certainty of evidence, and publication bias were evaluated. Confidence interval was 95%.

Results: From 29 included studies, 14 assessed preschoolers, nine assessed schoolchildren, four assessed adolescents, and two assessed children/adolescents. PUFA was the main index used to assess the exposure. ECOHIS (preschoolers) and CPQ (children/adolescents) were the main tools used to assess the outcome. Only five articles fully adhered to the quality criteria. The meta-analyses found the following main results: a) preschoolers: MD -10.79 (-16.50; -5.09); b) schoolchildren: MD -5.12 (-7.51; -2.72); c) adolescents: MD -1.86 (-4.59; 0.87); d) overall impact: SMD -2.18; (CI: -3.21;-1.15) and OR 0.52 (CI: 0.30; 0.90).

Conclusion: Pulp involvement impacted OHRQoL of children negatively. In adolescents, this impact was not observed. Results must be interpreted with caution due to very low certainty of evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Caries Research
Caries Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信