连接系统思维与农场管理:农业保护规划在农民采用保护措施中的作用

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Junyu Lu , Sarah P. Church , Pranay Ranjan , Emily M. Usher , Linda S. Prokopy
{"title":"连接系统思维与农场管理:农业保护规划在农民采用保护措施中的作用","authors":"Junyu Lu ,&nbsp;Sarah P. Church ,&nbsp;Pranay Ranjan ,&nbsp;Emily M. Usher ,&nbsp;Linda S. Prokopy","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Increasing the level of conservation efforts is crucial to achieving the goals of improving water quality and climate change adaptation. This study aims to investigate the influence of systems thinking and conservation planning on the adoption of agricultural conservation practices using farmers' survey data (N = 1008) in three watersheds in Indiana, U.S. We found that farmers who were systems thinkers were more likely to adopt multiple conservation practices than non-systems thinkers. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that not all farmers exhibit systems thinking tendencies; for both systems thinkers and non-systems thinkers, our findings underscore the pivotal role of conservation planning facilitated by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in promoting farmers' conservation behaviors. Specifically, farmers who had a conservation plan demonstrated a higher likelihood of adopting cover crops, conservation tillage (marginal evidence), a nutrient management plan, filter strips/other buffers, and most notably, adopting multiple conservation practices than farmers without a conservation plan. This study also reveals the process of how systems thinking, seeking and/or using information, and conservation plan adoption influence the adoption of multiple conservation practices using structural equation modeling. Further, we contend that the nine-step conservation planning process with the support of a well-trained professional conservationist represents a more advanced and science-based form of systems thinking process beyond farmers' typical thinking in farm management. This process can offer farmers guidance for continued maintenance of conservation systems in the field and promote a system-based farming approach by integrating multiple practices, regardless of whether the farmers were systems thinkers or not. This study provides valuable insights and practical implications for outreach and educators in using the conservation planning process to engage deeply with farmers, nurture farmers’ systems-thinking mindset, and facilitate a system-based farming approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 103372"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging systems thinking mindsets and farm management: The role of agricultural conservation planning in farmers’ adoption of conservation practices\",\"authors\":\"Junyu Lu ,&nbsp;Sarah P. Church ,&nbsp;Pranay Ranjan ,&nbsp;Emily M. Usher ,&nbsp;Linda S. Prokopy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Increasing the level of conservation efforts is crucial to achieving the goals of improving water quality and climate change adaptation. This study aims to investigate the influence of systems thinking and conservation planning on the adoption of agricultural conservation practices using farmers' survey data (N = 1008) in three watersheds in Indiana, U.S. We found that farmers who were systems thinkers were more likely to adopt multiple conservation practices than non-systems thinkers. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that not all farmers exhibit systems thinking tendencies; for both systems thinkers and non-systems thinkers, our findings underscore the pivotal role of conservation planning facilitated by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in promoting farmers' conservation behaviors. Specifically, farmers who had a conservation plan demonstrated a higher likelihood of adopting cover crops, conservation tillage (marginal evidence), a nutrient management plan, filter strips/other buffers, and most notably, adopting multiple conservation practices than farmers without a conservation plan. This study also reveals the process of how systems thinking, seeking and/or using information, and conservation plan adoption influence the adoption of multiple conservation practices using structural equation modeling. Further, we contend that the nine-step conservation planning process with the support of a well-trained professional conservationist represents a more advanced and science-based form of systems thinking process beyond farmers' typical thinking in farm management. This process can offer farmers guidance for continued maintenance of conservation systems in the field and promote a system-based farming approach by integrating multiple practices, regardless of whether the farmers were systems thinkers or not. This study provides valuable insights and practical implications for outreach and educators in using the conservation planning process to engage deeply with farmers, nurture farmers’ systems-thinking mindset, and facilitate a system-based farming approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724001761\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724001761","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高保护水平对于实现改善水质和适应气候变化的目标至关重要。本研究旨在利用美国印第安纳州三个流域的农民调查数据(N = 1008),研究系统思维和保护规划对采用农业保护措施的影响。我们发现,与非系统思维者相比,具有系统思维的农民更有可能采用多种保护措施。然而,必须承认的是,并非所有农民都表现出系统思维倾向;对于系统思维者和非系统思维者,我们的研究结果都强调了美国农业部自然资源保护局(NRCS)推动的保护规划在促进农民保护行为方面的关键作用。具体而言,与没有保护计划的农民相比,有保护计划的农民采用覆盖作物、保护性耕作(边际证据)、养分管理计划、过滤带/其他缓冲区的可能性更高,最明显的是,采用多种保护措施的可能性更高。本研究还利用结构方程模型揭示了系统思维、寻求和/或使用信息以及采用保护计划如何影响采用多种保护措施的过程。此外,我们认为,在训练有素的专业保护人员的支持下,九步保护规划过程代表了一种更先进、更科学的系统思维过程,超越了农民在农场管理中的典型思维。无论农民是否具有系统思维,这一过程都能为农民在田间持续维护保护系统提供指导,并通过整合多种实践来推广基于系统的耕作方法。这项研究为外联和教育工作者提供了宝贵的见解和实际意义,有助于他们利用保护规划过程与农民深入接触,培养农民的系统思维模式,促进以系统为基础的耕作方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging systems thinking mindsets and farm management: The role of agricultural conservation planning in farmers’ adoption of conservation practices

Increasing the level of conservation efforts is crucial to achieving the goals of improving water quality and climate change adaptation. This study aims to investigate the influence of systems thinking and conservation planning on the adoption of agricultural conservation practices using farmers' survey data (N = 1008) in three watersheds in Indiana, U.S. We found that farmers who were systems thinkers were more likely to adopt multiple conservation practices than non-systems thinkers. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that not all farmers exhibit systems thinking tendencies; for both systems thinkers and non-systems thinkers, our findings underscore the pivotal role of conservation planning facilitated by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in promoting farmers' conservation behaviors. Specifically, farmers who had a conservation plan demonstrated a higher likelihood of adopting cover crops, conservation tillage (marginal evidence), a nutrient management plan, filter strips/other buffers, and most notably, adopting multiple conservation practices than farmers without a conservation plan. This study also reveals the process of how systems thinking, seeking and/or using information, and conservation plan adoption influence the adoption of multiple conservation practices using structural equation modeling. Further, we contend that the nine-step conservation planning process with the support of a well-trained professional conservationist represents a more advanced and science-based form of systems thinking process beyond farmers' typical thinking in farm management. This process can offer farmers guidance for continued maintenance of conservation systems in the field and promote a system-based farming approach by integrating multiple practices, regardless of whether the farmers were systems thinkers or not. This study provides valuable insights and practical implications for outreach and educators in using the conservation planning process to engage deeply with farmers, nurture farmers’ systems-thinking mindset, and facilitate a system-based farming approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信