使用癌症委员会(CoC)质量措施评估特拉华州癌症护理质量,2018-2019 年。

Delaware journal of public health Pub Date : 2024-08-28 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.32481/djph.2024.08.04
Wilhelmina Ross, Diane Ng, Hayley Little, Sumitha Nagarajan, Paulette Robinson-Wilkerson, Dawn Hollinger
{"title":"使用癌症委员会(CoC)质量措施评估特拉华州癌症护理质量,2018-2019 年。","authors":"Wilhelmina Ross, Diane Ng, Hayley Little, Sumitha Nagarajan, Paulette Robinson-Wilkerson, Dawn Hollinger","doi":"10.32481/djph.2024.08.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) quality measures are used to monitor and evaluate metrics among their CoC-accredited programs, which include seven of Delaware's hospitals. The Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Public Health (DPH) also utilizes these metrics to monitor and evaluate Delaware's overall performance on these standards of care as it relates to the health care provided to cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Delaware Cancer Registry (DCR) cases diagnosed in 2018 and 2019 were selected and were analyzed separately to calculate results for each selected measure by year: HT, nBX, LNoSurg, and RECRTCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of the analysis showed that three out of the four CoC quality measures evaluated met the CoC standard of care for both 2018 and 2019 data. The three measures that met the CoC standards for 2018 were HT (90.4%), nBX (87.6%), and LNoSurg (93.3%). The RECRTCT measure did not meet the CoC standard for 2018 data with 71.4%. All four measures evaluated met the CoC standards for 2019 (HT - 91.6%; nBX - 85.2%; LNoSurg - 92.7%; RECRTCT - 92.3%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A majority of cases assessed met the CoC quality measure standards, meeting standards of cancer care and treatment. More discovery work needs to be done to assess the RECRTCT metric to explore reasons why cases did not meet the CoC quality measure standards. There was notable improvement seen for the HT measure over time, where cases had not met the CoC standard in previous years.</p><p><strong>Public health implications: </strong>When CoC quality measures are met, medical providers can ensure patients receive effective and targeted cancer care. This practice ultimately saves resources, reduces cancer burden, impacts survival, and improves public health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72774,"journal":{"name":"Delaware journal of public health","volume":"10 3","pages":"8-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11356582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Quality of Cancer Care in Delaware using Commission on Cancer (CoC) Quality Measures, 2018-2019.\",\"authors\":\"Wilhelmina Ross, Diane Ng, Hayley Little, Sumitha Nagarajan, Paulette Robinson-Wilkerson, Dawn Hollinger\",\"doi\":\"10.32481/djph.2024.08.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) quality measures are used to monitor and evaluate metrics among their CoC-accredited programs, which include seven of Delaware's hospitals. The Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Public Health (DPH) also utilizes these metrics to monitor and evaluate Delaware's overall performance on these standards of care as it relates to the health care provided to cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Delaware Cancer Registry (DCR) cases diagnosed in 2018 and 2019 were selected and were analyzed separately to calculate results for each selected measure by year: HT, nBX, LNoSurg, and RECRTCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of the analysis showed that three out of the four CoC quality measures evaluated met the CoC standard of care for both 2018 and 2019 data. The three measures that met the CoC standards for 2018 were HT (90.4%), nBX (87.6%), and LNoSurg (93.3%). The RECRTCT measure did not meet the CoC standard for 2018 data with 71.4%. All four measures evaluated met the CoC standards for 2019 (HT - 91.6%; nBX - 85.2%; LNoSurg - 92.7%; RECRTCT - 92.3%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A majority of cases assessed met the CoC quality measure standards, meeting standards of cancer care and treatment. More discovery work needs to be done to assess the RECRTCT metric to explore reasons why cases did not meet the CoC quality measure standards. There was notable improvement seen for the HT measure over time, where cases had not met the CoC standard in previous years.</p><p><strong>Public health implications: </strong>When CoC quality measures are met, medical providers can ensure patients receive effective and targeted cancer care. This practice ultimately saves resources, reduces cancer burden, impacts survival, and improves public health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Delaware journal of public health\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"8-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11356582/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Delaware journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2024.08.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delaware journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2024.08.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:美国外科医生学会癌症委员会(CoC)的质量衡量标准被用于监测和评估其CoC认证项目的各项指标,其中包括特拉华州的七家医院。特拉华州卫生和社会服务部公共卫生司(Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Public Health, DPH)也利用这些指标来监测和评估特拉华州在这些医疗标准方面的整体表现,因为这与为癌症患者提供的医疗服务有关:选取特拉华州癌症登记处(DCR)在 2018 年和 2019 年诊断的病例,并分别进行分析,计算出各年所选指标的结果:HT、nBX、LNoSurg 和 RECRTCT.结果:分析结果显示,在评估的四项CoC质量措施中,有三项在2018年和2019年的数据中均达到了CoC护理标准。2018 年达到 CoC 标准的三项措施分别是 HT(90.4%)、nBX(87.6%)和 LNoSurg(93.3%)。在 2018 年的数据中,RECRTCT 指标未达到 CoC 标准,仅为 71.4%。所有四项评估措施均符合 2019 年的 CoC 标准(HT - 91.6%;nBX - 85.2%;LNoSurg - 92.7%;RECRTCT - 92.3%):讨论:大多数评估病例符合CoC质量衡量标准,达到了癌症护理和治疗标准。在评估 RECRTCT 指标时,需要做更多的探索工作,以探究病例未达到 CoC 质量衡量标准的原因。随着时间的推移,前几年未达到 CoC 标准的 HT 指标有了明显改善:当达到 CoC 质量衡量标准时,医疗服务提供者可确保患者获得有效且有针对性的癌症护理。这种做法最终可节省资源、减轻癌症负担、影响生存率并改善公共卫生成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Quality of Cancer Care in Delaware using Commission on Cancer (CoC) Quality Measures, 2018-2019.

Introduction: American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) quality measures are used to monitor and evaluate metrics among their CoC-accredited programs, which include seven of Delaware's hospitals. The Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Public Health (DPH) also utilizes these metrics to monitor and evaluate Delaware's overall performance on these standards of care as it relates to the health care provided to cancer patients.

Methods: Delaware Cancer Registry (DCR) cases diagnosed in 2018 and 2019 were selected and were analyzed separately to calculate results for each selected measure by year: HT, nBX, LNoSurg, and RECRTCT.

Results: Results of the analysis showed that three out of the four CoC quality measures evaluated met the CoC standard of care for both 2018 and 2019 data. The three measures that met the CoC standards for 2018 were HT (90.4%), nBX (87.6%), and LNoSurg (93.3%). The RECRTCT measure did not meet the CoC standard for 2018 data with 71.4%. All four measures evaluated met the CoC standards for 2019 (HT - 91.6%; nBX - 85.2%; LNoSurg - 92.7%; RECRTCT - 92.3%).

Discussion: A majority of cases assessed met the CoC quality measure standards, meeting standards of cancer care and treatment. More discovery work needs to be done to assess the RECRTCT metric to explore reasons why cases did not meet the CoC quality measure standards. There was notable improvement seen for the HT measure over time, where cases had not met the CoC standard in previous years.

Public health implications: When CoC quality measures are met, medical providers can ensure patients receive effective and targeted cancer care. This practice ultimately saves resources, reduces cancer burden, impacts survival, and improves public health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信