像 ChatGPT 这样的大型语言模型大有可为,但人工智能的临床应用需要医生的合作,以实现患者护理、行政负担最小化、效率最大化和风险最小化。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Prem N Ramkumar, Joshua J Woo
{"title":"像 ChatGPT 这样的大型语言模型大有可为,但人工智能的临床应用需要医生的合作,以实现患者护理、行政负担最小化、效率最大化和风险最小化。","authors":"Prem N Ramkumar, Joshua J Woo","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forcing ChatGPT and other large language models to perform roles reserved for physicians and other healthcare professionals - namely evaluation, management, and triage - poses a threat from regulatory, risk management, and professional perspectives. The clinical practice of medicine would benefit tremendously from automated administrative support with systems-based transparency and fluidity - not substitution for clinical diagnostics and decision-making. ChatGPT and other large language models are not intended or authorized for clinical use, let alone to be tested or rubber stamped for this application. The best clinical use cases of artificial intelligence require physician partnership to enable personal care, minimize administrative burden, maximize efficiency, and minimize risk - without substitution of core physician tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large Language Models Like ChatGPT Show Promise, but Clinical Use of Artificial Intelligence Requires Physician Partnership to Enable Patient Care, Minimize Administrative Burden, Maximize Efficiency, and Minimize Risk.\",\"authors\":\"Prem N Ramkumar, Joshua J Woo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Forcing ChatGPT and other large language models to perform roles reserved for physicians and other healthcare professionals - namely evaluation, management, and triage - poses a threat from regulatory, risk management, and professional perspectives. The clinical practice of medicine would benefit tremendously from automated administrative support with systems-based transparency and fluidity - not substitution for clinical diagnostics and decision-making. ChatGPT and other large language models are not intended or authorized for clinical use, let alone to be tested or rubber stamped for this application. The best clinical use cases of artificial intelligence require physician partnership to enable personal care, minimize administrative burden, maximize efficiency, and minimize risk - without substitution of core physician tasks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.029\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从监管、风险管理和专业角度来看,强迫 ChatGPT 和其他大型语言模型执行专属于医生和其他医疗保健专业人员的角色(即评估、管理和分诊)构成了威胁。基于系统的透明度和流动性的自动化管理支持将使临床医疗实践受益匪浅,而不是取代临床诊断和决策。ChatGPT 和其他大型语言模型并不打算或授权用于临床,更不用说为这种应用进行测试或盖章了。人工智能的最佳临床应用案例需要医生的合作,以实现个人护理、最小化管理负担、最大化效率和最小化风险,而不会取代医生的核心任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large Language Models Like ChatGPT Show Promise, but Clinical Use of Artificial Intelligence Requires Physician Partnership to Enable Patient Care, Minimize Administrative Burden, Maximize Efficiency, and Minimize Risk.

Forcing ChatGPT and other large language models to perform roles reserved for physicians and other healthcare professionals - namely evaluation, management, and triage - poses a threat from regulatory, risk management, and professional perspectives. The clinical practice of medicine would benefit tremendously from automated administrative support with systems-based transparency and fluidity - not substitution for clinical diagnostics and decision-making. ChatGPT and other large language models are not intended or authorized for clinical use, let alone to be tested or rubber stamped for this application. The best clinical use cases of artificial intelligence require physician partnership to enable personal care, minimize administrative burden, maximize efficiency, and minimize risk - without substitution of core physician tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信