分诊工具是否能有效检测儿科创伤患者的颈椎损伤?- 带评论的科克伦综述摘要。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nalan Capan
{"title":"分诊工具是否能有效检测儿科创伤患者的颈椎损伤?- 带评论的科克伦综述摘要。","authors":"Nalan Capan","doi":"10.3233/NRE-246005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric cervical spine injuries (CSIs) from blunt trauma carry a high risk of neurological damage. Accurate diagnosis is vital for preventing harm and aiding recovery, yet the diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules (CDRs) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of triage tools for detecting CSI in pediatric trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A summary of the Cochrane Review by Tavender et al. (2024), with comments from a rehabilitation perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies with 21,379 participants assessed seven CDRs. Direct comparisons showed high sensitivity but low specificity across different CDRs. Indirect comparison studies also demonstrated varying sensitivities and specificities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insufficient evidence exists to determine the best tools for deciding if imaging is necessary for diagnosing potential CSI in children. Better quality studies are needed to assess the accuracy of CDRs for cervical spine clearance in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"55 1","pages":"147-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are triage tools effective for detecting cervical spine injury in paediatric trauma patients? - A Cochrane Review summary with commentary.\",\"authors\":\"Nalan Capan\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/NRE-246005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric cervical spine injuries (CSIs) from blunt trauma carry a high risk of neurological damage. Accurate diagnosis is vital for preventing harm and aiding recovery, yet the diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules (CDRs) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of triage tools for detecting CSI in pediatric trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A summary of the Cochrane Review by Tavender et al. (2024), with comments from a rehabilitation perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies with 21,379 participants assessed seven CDRs. Direct comparisons showed high sensitivity but low specificity across different CDRs. Indirect comparison studies also demonstrated varying sensitivities and specificities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insufficient evidence exists to determine the best tools for deciding if imaging is necessary for diagnosing potential CSI in children. Better quality studies are needed to assess the accuracy of CDRs for cervical spine clearance in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"147-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-246005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-246005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:钝性外伤导致的小儿颈椎损伤(CSI)具有很高的神经损伤风险。准确诊断对预防伤害和帮助康复至关重要,但临床决策规则(CDR)的诊断准确性仍不明确:目的:评估儿科创伤患者分诊工具检测 CSI 的有效性:方法:对 Tavender 等人的 Cochrane 综述(2024 年)进行总结,并从康复角度提出意见:结果:五项研究共 21379 人参与,评估了七种 CDR。直接比较显示,不同 CDR 的灵敏度较高,但特异性较低。间接比较研究也显示出不同的敏感性和特异性:结论:目前还没有足够的证据来确定诊断儿童潜在 CSI 是否需要影像学检查的最佳工具。需要进行质量更高的研究,以评估CDR对该人群颈椎清扫的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are triage tools effective for detecting cervical spine injury in paediatric trauma patients? - A Cochrane Review summary with commentary.

Background: Pediatric cervical spine injuries (CSIs) from blunt trauma carry a high risk of neurological damage. Accurate diagnosis is vital for preventing harm and aiding recovery, yet the diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules (CDRs) remains unclear.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of triage tools for detecting CSI in pediatric trauma patients.

Methods: A summary of the Cochrane Review by Tavender et al. (2024), with comments from a rehabilitation perspective.

Results: Five studies with 21,379 participants assessed seven CDRs. Direct comparisons showed high sensitivity but low specificity across different CDRs. Indirect comparison studies also demonstrated varying sensitivities and specificities.

Conclusions: Insufficient evidence exists to determine the best tools for deciding if imaging is necessary for diagnosing potential CSI in children. Better quality studies are needed to assess the accuracy of CDRs for cervical spine clearance in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信