基于轻量级深度学习模型的急性胆源性胰腺炎早期内镜治疗有效性的元分析。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Rihui Xiong, Danjuan Xiong, Zhaoping Wu, Xifeng Xiao
{"title":"基于轻量级深度学习模型的急性胆源性胰腺炎早期内镜治疗有效性的元分析。","authors":"Rihui Xiong, Danjuan Xiong, Zhaoping Wu, Xifeng Xiao","doi":"10.1186/s12876-024-03361-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is a clinical common acute abdomen. After the first pancreatitis, relapse rate is high, which seriously affects human life and health and causes great economic burdens to family and society. According to a great many research findings, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an effective treatment method. However, whether ERCP should be performed in early stage of ABP is still controversial in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Related articles were retrieved from Pubmed, Web of Science core library, Nature, Science Direct, and other databases published from January 2000 until now. The keywords included early ERCP, delayed ERCP, ABP, laparoscopy, and cholecystectomy, all which were connected by \"or\" and \"and\". The language of articles was not restricted during the retrieval and Review Manager5.3 was employed to perform meta-analysis of experimental data. Finally, a total of 8 eligible articles were selected, including 8,801 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that no remarkable differences were detected in the incidence of complications, mortality, and operation time between patients undergoing ERCP in early stage and those receiving delayed ERCP. However, the hospitalization time of patients in experimental group was notably shorter than that among patients in control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusins: </strong>Early ERCP treatment is as safe as late ERCP treatment for biliary pancreatitis, and can significantly shorten the hospital stay. Hence, the therapy was worthy of clinical promotion. The research findings provided reference and basis for clinical treatment of relevant diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"24 1","pages":"292"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11351377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of early endoscopic treatment of Acute biliary pancreatitis based on lightweight deep learning model.\",\"authors\":\"Rihui Xiong, Danjuan Xiong, Zhaoping Wu, Xifeng Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12876-024-03361-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is a clinical common acute abdomen. After the first pancreatitis, relapse rate is high, which seriously affects human life and health and causes great economic burdens to family and society. According to a great many research findings, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an effective treatment method. However, whether ERCP should be performed in early stage of ABP is still controversial in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Related articles were retrieved from Pubmed, Web of Science core library, Nature, Science Direct, and other databases published from January 2000 until now. The keywords included early ERCP, delayed ERCP, ABP, laparoscopy, and cholecystectomy, all which were connected by \\\"or\\\" and \\\"and\\\". The language of articles was not restricted during the retrieval and Review Manager5.3 was employed to perform meta-analysis of experimental data. Finally, a total of 8 eligible articles were selected, including 8,801 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that no remarkable differences were detected in the incidence of complications, mortality, and operation time between patients undergoing ERCP in early stage and those receiving delayed ERCP. However, the hospitalization time of patients in experimental group was notably shorter than that among patients in control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusins: </strong>Early ERCP treatment is as safe as late ERCP treatment for biliary pancreatitis, and can significantly shorten the hospital stay. Hence, the therapy was worthy of clinical promotion. The research findings provided reference and basis for clinical treatment of relevant diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11351377/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03361-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03361-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性胆源性胰腺炎(ABP)是临床常见的急腹症。胰腺炎初发后复发率高,严重影响患者生命健康,给家庭和社会造成巨大经济负担。大量研究表明,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是一种有效的治疗方法。然而,在临床实践中,是否应在 ABP 早期进行 ERCP 仍存在争议:方法:从 Pubmed、Web of Science 核心库、Nature、Science Direct 等数据库中检索 2000 年 1 月至今发表的相关文章。关键词包括早期ERCP、延迟ERCP、ABP、腹腔镜和胆囊切除术,所有关键词之间用 "或 "和 "和 "连接。检索时不限制文章的语言,并使用Review Manager5.3对实验数据进行荟萃分析。最后,共筛选出 8 篇符合条件的文章,包括 8801 名患者:荟萃分析结果表明,早期接受ERCP和延迟接受ERCP的患者在并发症发生率、死亡率和手术时间上没有明显差异。然而,实验组患者的住院时间明显短于对照组患者:结论:早期ERCP治疗胆源性胰腺炎与晚期ERCP治疗同样安全,并能显著缩短住院时间。因此,该疗法值得临床推广。该研究成果为相关疾病的临床治疗提供了参考和依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of early endoscopic treatment of Acute biliary pancreatitis based on lightweight deep learning model.

Background: Acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is a clinical common acute abdomen. After the first pancreatitis, relapse rate is high, which seriously affects human life and health and causes great economic burdens to family and society. According to a great many research findings, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an effective treatment method. However, whether ERCP should be performed in early stage of ABP is still controversial in clinical practice.

Methods: Related articles were retrieved from Pubmed, Web of Science core library, Nature, Science Direct, and other databases published from January 2000 until now. The keywords included early ERCP, delayed ERCP, ABP, laparoscopy, and cholecystectomy, all which were connected by "or" and "and". The language of articles was not restricted during the retrieval and Review Manager5.3 was employed to perform meta-analysis of experimental data. Finally, a total of 8 eligible articles were selected, including 8,801 patients.

Results: The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that no remarkable differences were detected in the incidence of complications, mortality, and operation time between patients undergoing ERCP in early stage and those receiving delayed ERCP. However, the hospitalization time of patients in experimental group was notably shorter than that among patients in control group.

Conclusins: Early ERCP treatment is as safe as late ERCP treatment for biliary pancreatitis, and can significantly shorten the hospital stay. Hence, the therapy was worthy of clinical promotion. The research findings provided reference and basis for clinical treatment of relevant diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信