自发性冠状动脉夹层的指导性护理:基于医疗系统的经验

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Eleanor Christenson , Deeksha Acharya , Kathryn Berlacher, Agnes Koczo
{"title":"自发性冠状动脉夹层的指导性护理:基于医疗系统的经验","authors":"Eleanor Christenson ,&nbsp;Deeksha Acharya ,&nbsp;Kathryn Berlacher,&nbsp;Agnes Koczo","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Data on treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has evolved with guidance from national societies beginning around 2018. Given emerging guidance and relatively uncommon presentation of SCAD, we hypothesized that a specialized SCAD clinic would improve guidance-based care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilized a system-wide electronic medical record search to identify individuals with SCAD diagnosis from 2018 to 2023. All diagnostic angiograms were reviewed to verify diagnosis. We analyzed frequency of guidance-based care since 2018 system-wide. We also compared guidance-based care for individuals with index visits to the SCAD outpatient clinic as compared to non-SCAD clinic providers from initiation of specialty clinic in 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Differences were observed in pregnancy and contraception discussions (88 % vs 0 %, p &lt; 0.001) among pre-menopausal individuals in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics. Safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in menopausal women was addressed more by SCAD clinic providers (85 % vs 7 %, p &lt; 0.001). There was more fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) screening in SCAD clinic (100 % vs 30 %, p &lt; 0.001). Among individuals with migraines, there was more discussion of triggering medications (triptans) in SCAD clinic (80 % vs 14 %, p = 0.008). In individuals prescribed statins not by primary prevention guidelines and without atherosclerosis, there was a trend toward more discussion of statin use in SCAD clinic follow up vs non-SCAD clinic providers (63 % vs 17 %, p = 0.06).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Individuals with follow up in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics were more likely to have future pregnancy and contraception counseling, discussion of HRT safety, and FMD screening following index outpatient visit. Future quality improvement initiatives will target these aspects of guidance-based care among non-SCAD clinic providers with integration into cardiology fellow training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001647/pdfft?md5=1a5e079813addd8a512b9c2bd309b41d&pid=1-s2.0-S2352906724001647-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidance Directed Care of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Healthcare System-Based Experience\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor Christenson ,&nbsp;Deeksha Acharya ,&nbsp;Kathryn Berlacher,&nbsp;Agnes Koczo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Data on treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has evolved with guidance from national societies beginning around 2018. Given emerging guidance and relatively uncommon presentation of SCAD, we hypothesized that a specialized SCAD clinic would improve guidance-based care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilized a system-wide electronic medical record search to identify individuals with SCAD diagnosis from 2018 to 2023. All diagnostic angiograms were reviewed to verify diagnosis. We analyzed frequency of guidance-based care since 2018 system-wide. We also compared guidance-based care for individuals with index visits to the SCAD outpatient clinic as compared to non-SCAD clinic providers from initiation of specialty clinic in 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Differences were observed in pregnancy and contraception discussions (88 % vs 0 %, p &lt; 0.001) among pre-menopausal individuals in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics. Safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in menopausal women was addressed more by SCAD clinic providers (85 % vs 7 %, p &lt; 0.001). There was more fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) screening in SCAD clinic (100 % vs 30 %, p &lt; 0.001). Among individuals with migraines, there was more discussion of triggering medications (triptans) in SCAD clinic (80 % vs 14 %, p = 0.008). In individuals prescribed statins not by primary prevention guidelines and without atherosclerosis, there was a trend toward more discussion of statin use in SCAD clinic follow up vs non-SCAD clinic providers (63 % vs 17 %, p = 0.06).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Individuals with follow up in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics were more likely to have future pregnancy and contraception counseling, discussion of HRT safety, and FMD screening following index outpatient visit. Future quality improvement initiatives will target these aspects of guidance-based care among non-SCAD clinic providers with integration into cardiology fellow training.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001647/pdfft?md5=1a5e079813addd8a512b9c2bd309b41d&pid=1-s2.0-S2352906724001647-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724001647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)的治疗数据随着各国学会从 2018 年左右开始提供指导而不断发展。鉴于新出现的指导意见和 SCAD 相对不常见的表现形式,我们假设 SCAD 专科门诊将改善基于指导意见的治疗。我们审查了所有诊断性血管造影,以核实诊断。我们分析了自 2018 年以来全系统基于指导的护理频率。我们还比较了自 2021 年专科门诊启动以来,与非 SCAD 诊所提供者相比,SCAD 门诊索引就诊者的指导性护理情况。结果观察到,与非 SCAD 诊所相比,SCAD 诊所绝经前患者的妊娠和避孕讨论存在差异(88 % vs 0 %,p <0.001)。更年期妇女激素替代疗法(HRT)的安全性在 SCAD 诊所提供者中得到了更多的讨论(85% 对 7%,p < 0.001)。在 SCAD 诊所,纤维肌发育不良(FMD)筛查率更高(100% 对 30%,p < 0.001)。在偏头痛患者中,SCAD 诊所对诱发药物(曲普坦)的讨论更多(80% 对 14%,p = 0.008)。结论与非 SCAD 诊所的患者相比,在 SCAD 诊所接受随访的患者更有可能在门诊就诊后获得未来妊娠和避孕咨询、获得有关 HRT 安全性的讨论以及进行 FMD 筛查。未来的质量改进计划将针对非 SCAD 诊所的医疗服务提供者在这些方面的指导性护理,并将其纳入心脏病学研究员的培训中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidance Directed Care of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Healthcare System-Based Experience

Introduction

Data on treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has evolved with guidance from national societies beginning around 2018. Given emerging guidance and relatively uncommon presentation of SCAD, we hypothesized that a specialized SCAD clinic would improve guidance-based care.

Methods

We utilized a system-wide electronic medical record search to identify individuals with SCAD diagnosis from 2018 to 2023. All diagnostic angiograms were reviewed to verify diagnosis. We analyzed frequency of guidance-based care since 2018 system-wide. We also compared guidance-based care for individuals with index visits to the SCAD outpatient clinic as compared to non-SCAD clinic providers from initiation of specialty clinic in 2021.

Results

Differences were observed in pregnancy and contraception discussions (88 % vs 0 %, p < 0.001) among pre-menopausal individuals in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics. Safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in menopausal women was addressed more by SCAD clinic providers (85 % vs 7 %, p < 0.001). There was more fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) screening in SCAD clinic (100 % vs 30 %, p < 0.001). Among individuals with migraines, there was more discussion of triggering medications (triptans) in SCAD clinic (80 % vs 14 %, p = 0.008). In individuals prescribed statins not by primary prevention guidelines and without atherosclerosis, there was a trend toward more discussion of statin use in SCAD clinic follow up vs non-SCAD clinic providers (63 % vs 17 %, p = 0.06).

Conclusions

Individuals with follow up in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics were more likely to have future pregnancy and contraception counseling, discussion of HRT safety, and FMD screening following index outpatient visit. Future quality improvement initiatives will target these aspects of guidance-based care among non-SCAD clinic providers with integration into cardiology fellow training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信