Yi Yang, Shun-Cheng Zhou, Yi-Hui Ma, Xiang Wang, Qing-Shan Dong
{"title":"倾斜邻牙种植和正畸治疗的临床疗效、骨密度和随访。","authors":"Yi Yang, Shun-Cheng Zhou, Yi-Hui Ma, Xiang Wang, Qing-Shan Dong","doi":"10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tooth defects can cause elongation of occlusal teeth, leading to insufficient repair space. The combination of dental implant restoration and orthodontic treatment of oblique adjacent teeth has a significant therapeutic effect.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore clinical efficacy, bone density, and follow-up of implant and orthodontic treatment for patients with inclined adjacent teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 98 patients with oblique adjacent teeth were randomly assigned to implant restoration combined with orthodontic treatment (group A, <i>n</i> = 49) or to receive implant restoration alone (group B, <i>n</i> = 49). Changes in alveolar ridge bone density and apical bone density were observed before and after treatment in the two groups. Changes in chewing function and language function were compared between the two groups of patients. Follow-up lasted for 12 mo after repair to observe any adverse reactions in the oral cavity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical effective rates of group A and group B were 97.96% and 85.71%, respectively, with group A having a higher clinical effective rate than group B. After treatment, the bone density of the alveolar ridge and apical bone in both groups decreased compared to before treatment, while the chewing and language functions improved. The changes in various indicators in group A were more significant. After treatment, the satisfaction rate of group A (97.96%) was higher than that of group B (79.59%). The incidence of adverse reactions in group A (2.04%) was lower than that in group B (24.49%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The amalgamation of implant restoration and orthodontic treatment for adjacent tilted teeth demonstrates notable clinical efficacy, diminishes alveolar bone resorption, and fosters patient functional rehabilitation while exhibiting negligible adverse reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23912,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Clinical Cases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11269983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficacy, bone density, and follow-up in implant and orthodontic treatment for inclined adjacent teeth.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Yang, Shun-Cheng Zhou, Yi-Hui Ma, Xiang Wang, Qing-Shan Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tooth defects can cause elongation of occlusal teeth, leading to insufficient repair space. The combination of dental implant restoration and orthodontic treatment of oblique adjacent teeth has a significant therapeutic effect.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore clinical efficacy, bone density, and follow-up of implant and orthodontic treatment for patients with inclined adjacent teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 98 patients with oblique adjacent teeth were randomly assigned to implant restoration combined with orthodontic treatment (group A, <i>n</i> = 49) or to receive implant restoration alone (group B, <i>n</i> = 49). Changes in alveolar ridge bone density and apical bone density were observed before and after treatment in the two groups. Changes in chewing function and language function were compared between the two groups of patients. Follow-up lasted for 12 mo after repair to observe any adverse reactions in the oral cavity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical effective rates of group A and group B were 97.96% and 85.71%, respectively, with group A having a higher clinical effective rate than group B. After treatment, the bone density of the alveolar ridge and apical bone in both groups decreased compared to before treatment, while the chewing and language functions improved. The changes in various indicators in group A were more significant. After treatment, the satisfaction rate of group A (97.96%) was higher than that of group B (79.59%). The incidence of adverse reactions in group A (2.04%) was lower than that in group B (24.49%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The amalgamation of implant restoration and orthodontic treatment for adjacent tilted teeth demonstrates notable clinical efficacy, diminishes alveolar bone resorption, and fosters patient functional rehabilitation while exhibiting negligible adverse reactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Clinical Cases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11269983/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Clinical Cases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5542\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Clinical Cases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5542","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:牙齿缺损会造成咬合牙齿伸长,导致修复空间不足。目的:探讨倾斜邻牙患者种植修复联合正畸治疗的临床疗效、骨密度和随访情况:方法:随机分配98名斜面邻牙患者接受种植修复联合正畸治疗(A组,49人)或单独接受种植修复(B组,49人)。观察两组患者治疗前后牙槽嵴骨密度和根尖骨密度的变化。比较两组患者咀嚼功能和语言功能的变化。修复后随访 12 个月,观察口腔的不良反应:A组和B组的临床有效率分别为97.96%和85.71%,A组的临床有效率高于B组。治疗后,两组患者牙槽嵴和根尖骨的骨密度较治疗前均有所下降,而咀嚼功能和语言功能则有所改善。其中,A 组各项指标的变化更为显著。治疗后,A 组的满意度(97.96%)高于 B 组(79.59%)。A组不良反应发生率(2.04%)低于B组(24.49%):结论:种植修复与相邻倾斜牙齿的正畸治疗相结合,临床疗效显著,减少了牙槽骨吸收,促进了患者的功能康复,同时不良反应微乎其微。
Clinical efficacy, bone density, and follow-up in implant and orthodontic treatment for inclined adjacent teeth.
Background: Tooth defects can cause elongation of occlusal teeth, leading to insufficient repair space. The combination of dental implant restoration and orthodontic treatment of oblique adjacent teeth has a significant therapeutic effect.
Aim: To explore clinical efficacy, bone density, and follow-up of implant and orthodontic treatment for patients with inclined adjacent teeth.
Methods: In total, 98 patients with oblique adjacent teeth were randomly assigned to implant restoration combined with orthodontic treatment (group A, n = 49) or to receive implant restoration alone (group B, n = 49). Changes in alveolar ridge bone density and apical bone density were observed before and after treatment in the two groups. Changes in chewing function and language function were compared between the two groups of patients. Follow-up lasted for 12 mo after repair to observe any adverse reactions in the oral cavity.
Results: The clinical effective rates of group A and group B were 97.96% and 85.71%, respectively, with group A having a higher clinical effective rate than group B. After treatment, the bone density of the alveolar ridge and apical bone in both groups decreased compared to before treatment, while the chewing and language functions improved. The changes in various indicators in group A were more significant. After treatment, the satisfaction rate of group A (97.96%) was higher than that of group B (79.59%). The incidence of adverse reactions in group A (2.04%) was lower than that in group B (24.49%).
Conclusion: The amalgamation of implant restoration and orthodontic treatment for adjacent tilted teeth demonstrates notable clinical efficacy, diminishes alveolar bone resorption, and fosters patient functional rehabilitation while exhibiting negligible adverse reactions.
期刊介绍:
The World Journal of Clinical Cases (WJCC) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJCC is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of clinical cases. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJCC is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJCC are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in clinical cases.