胎儿生长受限新生儿亚临床心肌功能障碍:一项病例对照研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Vidya Nayak, Ashwal A J, Leslie Edward Lewis, Jyothi Samanth, Krishnananda Nayak, Sumbaraju Sudheshna Lalitha, Prathiksha Prabhu K, Swathi M Poojary
{"title":"胎儿生长受限新生儿亚临床心肌功能障碍:一项病例对照研究。","authors":"Vidya Nayak, Ashwal A J, Leslie Edward Lewis, Jyothi Samanth, Krishnananda Nayak, Sumbaraju Sudheshna Lalitha, Prathiksha Prabhu K, Swathi M Poojary","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2392783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate cardiac structural and functional changes in neonates with fetal growth restriction (FGR) compared to appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) neonates using conventional echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), and speckle tracking echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This case-control study included 85 FGR neonates and 75 non-FGR, weight adequate for gestational age neonates. Among these, 37 were symmetric FGR and 48 were asymmetric FGR. All the biophysical profiles of these newborns were assessed. An echocardiographic test was performed to evaluate cardiac dimension, Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF), Mitral valve Doppler flow velocities, myocardial performance index, tissue annular velocities, and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although LVEF was found to be within the normal range, mean EF was reduced among neonates with FGR than non-FGR controls (EF: 66.14 ± 3.85% vs 69.46 ± 3.58%; <i>p</i> < 0.001, in FGR and non-FGR, respectively). Furthermore, LV E/E' a measure of LV diastolic function was altered among both types of FGR neonates. Similarly, LV GLS was reduced among FGR neonates (LV GLS: -20.69 ± 2.7% vs -19.06 ± 2.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001 in non-FGR and FGR, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FGR neonates exhibit significant alterations in cardiac geometry compared to AGA controls. FGR neonates also demonstrated a significant reduction in LV EF, FS, and LV global longitudinal strain, depicting failure to adapt to the increased cardiac workload after birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subclinical myocardial dysfunction among fetal growth restriction neonates: a case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Vidya Nayak, Ashwal A J, Leslie Edward Lewis, Jyothi Samanth, Krishnananda Nayak, Sumbaraju Sudheshna Lalitha, Prathiksha Prabhu K, Swathi M Poojary\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2024.2392783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate cardiac structural and functional changes in neonates with fetal growth restriction (FGR) compared to appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) neonates using conventional echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), and speckle tracking echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This case-control study included 85 FGR neonates and 75 non-FGR, weight adequate for gestational age neonates. Among these, 37 were symmetric FGR and 48 were asymmetric FGR. All the biophysical profiles of these newborns were assessed. An echocardiographic test was performed to evaluate cardiac dimension, Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF), Mitral valve Doppler flow velocities, myocardial performance index, tissue annular velocities, and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although LVEF was found to be within the normal range, mean EF was reduced among neonates with FGR than non-FGR controls (EF: 66.14 ± 3.85% vs 69.46 ± 3.58%; <i>p</i> < 0.001, in FGR and non-FGR, respectively). Furthermore, LV E/E' a measure of LV diastolic function was altered among both types of FGR neonates. Similarly, LV GLS was reduced among FGR neonates (LV GLS: -20.69 ± 2.7% vs -19.06 ± 2.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001 in non-FGR and FGR, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FGR neonates exhibit significant alterations in cardiac geometry compared to AGA controls. FGR neonates also demonstrated a significant reduction in LV EF, FS, and LV global longitudinal strain, depicting failure to adapt to the increased cardiac workload after birth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2392783\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2392783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的采用传统超声心动图、组织多普勒成像(TDI)和斑点追踪超声心动图,评估胎儿生长受限(FGR)新生儿与适宜胎龄(AGA)新生儿相比在心脏结构和功能方面的变化:这项病例对照研究包括 85 例 FGR 新生儿和 75 例非 FGR、体重符合胎龄的新生儿。其中,37 例为对称性 FGR,48 例为非对称性 FGR。对这些新生儿的所有生物物理特征进行了评估。超声心动图检查评估了心脏尺寸、左心室射血分数(LV EF)、二尖瓣多普勒血流速度、心肌性能指数、组织环速度和左心室整体纵向应变(GLS):结果:尽管发现LVEF在正常范围内,但与非FGR对照组相比,FGR新生儿的平均EF降低了(EF:66.14 ± 3.85% vs 69.46 ± 3.58%; p p 结论:与AGA对照组相比,FGR新生儿的心脏几何形状有明显改变。FGR新生儿的左心室EF、FS和左心室整体纵向应变也显著降低,这表明他们未能适应出生后增加的心脏工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subclinical myocardial dysfunction among fetal growth restriction neonates: a case-control study.

Objectives: To evaluate cardiac structural and functional changes in neonates with fetal growth restriction (FGR) compared to appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) neonates using conventional echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), and speckle tracking echocardiography.

Method: This case-control study included 85 FGR neonates and 75 non-FGR, weight adequate for gestational age neonates. Among these, 37 were symmetric FGR and 48 were asymmetric FGR. All the biophysical profiles of these newborns were assessed. An echocardiographic test was performed to evaluate cardiac dimension, Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF), Mitral valve Doppler flow velocities, myocardial performance index, tissue annular velocities, and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS).

Results: Although LVEF was found to be within the normal range, mean EF was reduced among neonates with FGR than non-FGR controls (EF: 66.14 ± 3.85% vs 69.46 ± 3.58%; p < 0.001, in FGR and non-FGR, respectively). Furthermore, LV E/E' a measure of LV diastolic function was altered among both types of FGR neonates. Similarly, LV GLS was reduced among FGR neonates (LV GLS: -20.69 ± 2.7% vs -19.06 ± 2.9%; p < 0.001 in non-FGR and FGR, respectively).

Conclusion: FGR neonates exhibit significant alterations in cardiac geometry compared to AGA controls. FGR neonates also demonstrated a significant reduction in LV EF, FS, and LV global longitudinal strain, depicting failure to adapt to the increased cardiac workload after birth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信