育儿假:医生协会为员工提供了什么?

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2024-08-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2024.0043
Sofia von Fedak, Sonya Priven, Amna Khalid, Amanda Brooks, Gregg C Lund
{"title":"育儿假:医生协会为员工提供了什么?","authors":"Sofia von Fedak, Sonya Priven, Amna Khalid, Amanda Brooks, Gregg C Lund","doi":"10.1089/whr.2024.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Parental leave yields significant health benefits for parents and children. While many medical associations endorse parental leave, it is unknown what parental leave they provide for their employees.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess parental leave policies of national physician societies for their employees including paid versus unpaid and parity between birth mothers and non-birthing parents.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis in 2023 examined parental leave policies of national physician societies, including the American Medical Association (AMA), American Osteopathic Association (AOA), and six specialty societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOOG), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians (ACOP), American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), and American College of Osteopathic Family Physicians (ACOFP). Examination of policies included: duration, whether paid or unpaid; qualifications before receiving benefit; and whether non-birthing, adoptive, and foster parents were covered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the eight societies surveyed, two (25%) did not disclose their policies (ACOG, ACOP), and one (12.5%) lacked a policy (ACOOG). Of the remaining five, two (40%) offered paid leave (AMA, AAP), while three (60%) provided unpaid leave in line with legal requirements (AOA, AAFP, ACOFP). Benefits for non-birthing parents mirrored those for birth mothers, although the AMA offered birth mothers enhanced benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only a minority of surveyed physician societies provide paid parental leave. Physician societies should consider providing paid parental leave for their employees and making their policies publicly available to promote and model the benefit of paid parental leave.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"588-593"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental Leave: What Do Physician Societies Provide for Their Employees?\",\"authors\":\"Sofia von Fedak, Sonya Priven, Amna Khalid, Amanda Brooks, Gregg C Lund\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/whr.2024.0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Parental leave yields significant health benefits for parents and children. While many medical associations endorse parental leave, it is unknown what parental leave they provide for their employees.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess parental leave policies of national physician societies for their employees including paid versus unpaid and parity between birth mothers and non-birthing parents.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis in 2023 examined parental leave policies of national physician societies, including the American Medical Association (AMA), American Osteopathic Association (AOA), and six specialty societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOOG), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians (ACOP), American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), and American College of Osteopathic Family Physicians (ACOFP). Examination of policies included: duration, whether paid or unpaid; qualifications before receiving benefit; and whether non-birthing, adoptive, and foster parents were covered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the eight societies surveyed, two (25%) did not disclose their policies (ACOG, ACOP), and one (12.5%) lacked a policy (ACOOG). Of the remaining five, two (40%) offered paid leave (AMA, AAP), while three (60%) provided unpaid leave in line with legal requirements (AOA, AAFP, ACOFP). Benefits for non-birthing parents mirrored those for birth mothers, although the AMA offered birth mothers enhanced benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only a minority of surveyed physician societies provide paid parental leave. Physician societies should consider providing paid parental leave for their employees and making their policies publicly available to promote and model the benefit of paid parental leave.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"588-593\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342047/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言育儿假对父母和子女的健康大有裨益。虽然许多医学协会支持育儿假,但他们为员工提供了哪些育儿假却不得而知:目的:评估各国医师协会为其员工提供的育儿假政策,包括带薪假与无薪假,以及生育母亲与非生育父母之间的平等性:2023 年的一项横断面分析研究了全国性医生协会的育儿假政策,包括美国医学协会 (AMA)、美国骨科协会 (AOA) 和六个专科协会:美国妇产科医师学会 (ACOG)、美国骨科妇产科医师学会 (ACOOG)、美国儿科学会 (AAP)、美国骨科儿科医师学会 (ACOP)、美国家庭医师学会 (AAFP) 和美国骨科家庭医师学会 (ACOFP)。对政策的审查包括:持续时间,是有偿还是无偿;享受福利前的资格;以及是否涵盖非分娩、收养和寄养父母:在接受调查的八个协会中,有两个(25%)没有公开其政策(ACOG、ACOP),一个(12.5%)没有政策(ACOOG)。其余五家中,两家(40%)提供带薪休假(美国医学会、美国助理医师协会),三家(60%)提供符合法律要求的无薪假期(美国医学会、美国助理医师协会、美国助理医师协会)。非分娩父母的福利与分娩母亲的福利相同,但美国医学会为分娩母亲提供了更多的福利:结论:只有少数接受调查的医师协会提供带薪育儿假。医师协会应考虑为其员工提供带薪育儿假,并公开其政策,以推广和示范带薪育儿假的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parental Leave: What Do Physician Societies Provide for Their Employees?

Introduction: Parental leave yields significant health benefits for parents and children. While many medical associations endorse parental leave, it is unknown what parental leave they provide for their employees.

Objective: To assess parental leave policies of national physician societies for their employees including paid versus unpaid and parity between birth mothers and non-birthing parents.

Methods and materials: A cross-sectional analysis in 2023 examined parental leave policies of national physician societies, including the American Medical Association (AMA), American Osteopathic Association (AOA), and six specialty societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOOG), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians (ACOP), American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), and American College of Osteopathic Family Physicians (ACOFP). Examination of policies included: duration, whether paid or unpaid; qualifications before receiving benefit; and whether non-birthing, adoptive, and foster parents were covered.

Results: Among the eight societies surveyed, two (25%) did not disclose their policies (ACOG, ACOP), and one (12.5%) lacked a policy (ACOOG). Of the remaining five, two (40%) offered paid leave (AMA, AAP), while three (60%) provided unpaid leave in line with legal requirements (AOA, AAFP, ACOFP). Benefits for non-birthing parents mirrored those for birth mothers, although the AMA offered birth mothers enhanced benefits.

Conclusions: Only a minority of surveyed physician societies provide paid parental leave. Physician societies should consider providing paid parental leave for their employees and making their policies publicly available to promote and model the benefit of paid parental leave.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信