[锚缝合桥技术治疗膝关节后交叉韧带胫骨插入点撕脱骨折的临床疗效]。

Q3 Medicine
Xiucheng Chu, Yanhua Li, Yanqing Zheng, Yuemei Li, Fengli Wang
{"title":"[锚缝合桥技术治疗膝关节后交叉韧带胫骨插入点撕脱骨折的临床疗效]。","authors":"Xiucheng Chu, Yanhua Li, Yanqing Zheng, Yuemei Li, Fengli Wang","doi":"10.12182/20240760106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical efficacy of the anchor suture bridge technique in treating avulsion fractures at the tibial insertion point of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in the knee joint.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we reviewed 80 patients with PCL tibial avulsion fractures treated using the anchor suture bridge technique in our department from February 2010 to December 2023. Follow-ups were conducted starting at 3 months post-surgery, then every 3 months until 12 months post-surgery. Clinical and follow-up data of each patient were analyzed. The Lysholm and Hospital for Special Surgery Knee-Rating Scale (HSS) scores of knee function before surgery and at the last follow-up were compared to assess the surgical treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 80 patients were followed up for an average of (12.16±1.08) months post-surgery. Re-examination X-rays showed that all fractures had healed, with an average healing time of (3.66±0.51) months. All patients recovered well, with primary healing of surgical incisions and no complications such as neurovascular injury, skin necrosis, incision infection, fracture displacement, or ligament laxity. Postoperative knee Lysholm and HSS scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores. At the last follow-up, the Lysholm score increased from (46.30±6.10) preoperatively to (90.85±3.27), and the HSS score increased from (45.30±5.80) to (91.15±2.66), with statistically significant differences (<i>P</i><0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The anchor suture bridge technique is effective in treating avulsion fractures of the PCL tibial insertion point in the knee joint. It has a high safety profile and leads to good postoperative knee function recovery, with no serious postoperative complications, demonstrating excellent clinical efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":39321,"journal":{"name":"四川大学学报(医学版)","volume":"55 4","pages":"1020-1025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical Efficacy of Anchor Suture Bridge Technique for Avulsion Fractures of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Insertion Point in the Knee Joint].\",\"authors\":\"Xiucheng Chu, Yanhua Li, Yanqing Zheng, Yuemei Li, Fengli Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.12182/20240760106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical efficacy of the anchor suture bridge technique in treating avulsion fractures at the tibial insertion point of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in the knee joint.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we reviewed 80 patients with PCL tibial avulsion fractures treated using the anchor suture bridge technique in our department from February 2010 to December 2023. Follow-ups were conducted starting at 3 months post-surgery, then every 3 months until 12 months post-surgery. Clinical and follow-up data of each patient were analyzed. The Lysholm and Hospital for Special Surgery Knee-Rating Scale (HSS) scores of knee function before surgery and at the last follow-up were compared to assess the surgical treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 80 patients were followed up for an average of (12.16±1.08) months post-surgery. Re-examination X-rays showed that all fractures had healed, with an average healing time of (3.66±0.51) months. All patients recovered well, with primary healing of surgical incisions and no complications such as neurovascular injury, skin necrosis, incision infection, fracture displacement, or ligament laxity. Postoperative knee Lysholm and HSS scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores. At the last follow-up, the Lysholm score increased from (46.30±6.10) preoperatively to (90.85±3.27), and the HSS score increased from (45.30±5.80) to (91.15±2.66), with statistically significant differences (<i>P</i><0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The anchor suture bridge technique is effective in treating avulsion fractures of the PCL tibial insertion point in the knee joint. It has a high safety profile and leads to good postoperative knee function recovery, with no serious postoperative complications, demonstrating excellent clinical efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"四川大学学报(医学版)\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"1020-1025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334289/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"四川大学学报(医学版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12182/20240760106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"四川大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12182/20240760106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究锚缝合桥技术治疗膝关节后交叉韧带(PCL)胫骨插入点撕脱性骨折的临床疗效:在这项研究中,我们回顾了 2010 年 2 月至 2023 年 12 月期间在我科使用锚缝合桥技术治疗 PCL 胫骨撕脱骨折的 80 例患者。从术后 3 个月开始进行随访,之后每 3 个月随访一次,直至术后 12 个月。对每位患者的临床和随访数据进行了分析。比较了手术前和最后一次随访时膝关节功能的Lysholm和特殊外科医院膝关节评分量表(HSS)得分,以评估手术治疗效果:对80名患者进行了平均为(12.16±1.08)个月的术后随访。复查 X 光片显示,所有骨折均已愈合,平均愈合时间为(3.66±0.51)个月。所有患者均恢复良好,手术切口基本愈合,未出现神经血管损伤、皮肤坏死、切口感染、骨折移位或韧带松弛等并发症。术后膝关节 Lysholm 和 HSS 评分明显高于术前评分。最后一次随访时,Lysholm评分从术前的(46.30±6.10)分升至(90.85±3.27)分,HSS评分从(45.30±5.80)分升至(91.15±2.66)分,差异有统计学意义(PC结论:锚缝合桥技术可有效治疗膝关节 PCL 胫骨插入点撕脱骨折。其安全性高,术后膝关节功能恢复良好,无严重术后并发症,临床疗效显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Clinical Efficacy of Anchor Suture Bridge Technique for Avulsion Fractures of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Insertion Point in the Knee Joint].

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of the anchor suture bridge technique in treating avulsion fractures at the tibial insertion point of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in the knee joint.

Methods: In this study, we reviewed 80 patients with PCL tibial avulsion fractures treated using the anchor suture bridge technique in our department from February 2010 to December 2023. Follow-ups were conducted starting at 3 months post-surgery, then every 3 months until 12 months post-surgery. Clinical and follow-up data of each patient were analyzed. The Lysholm and Hospital for Special Surgery Knee-Rating Scale (HSS) scores of knee function before surgery and at the last follow-up were compared to assess the surgical treatment outcome.

Results: The 80 patients were followed up for an average of (12.16±1.08) months post-surgery. Re-examination X-rays showed that all fractures had healed, with an average healing time of (3.66±0.51) months. All patients recovered well, with primary healing of surgical incisions and no complications such as neurovascular injury, skin necrosis, incision infection, fracture displacement, or ligament laxity. Postoperative knee Lysholm and HSS scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores. At the last follow-up, the Lysholm score increased from (46.30±6.10) preoperatively to (90.85±3.27), and the HSS score increased from (45.30±5.80) to (91.15±2.66), with statistically significant differences (P<0.025).

Conclusion: The anchor suture bridge technique is effective in treating avulsion fractures of the PCL tibial insertion point in the knee joint. It has a high safety profile and leads to good postoperative knee function recovery, with no serious postoperative complications, demonstrating excellent clinical efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
四川大学学报(医学版)
四川大学学报(医学版) Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8695
期刊介绍: "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" is a comprehensive medical academic journal sponsored by Sichuan University, a higher education institution directly under the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. It was founded in 1959 and was originally named "Journal of Sichuan Medical College". In 1986, it was renamed "Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences". In 2003, it was renamed "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" (bimonthly). "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" is a Chinese core journal and a Chinese authoritative academic journal (RCCSE). It is included in the retrieval systems such as China Science and Technology Papers and Citation Database (CSTPCD), China Science Citation Database (CSCD) (core version), Peking University Library's "Overview of Chinese Core Journals", the U.S. "Index Medica" (IM/Medline), the U.S. "PubMed Central" (PMC), the U.S. "Biological Abstracts" (BA), the U.S. "Chemical Abstracts" (CA), the U.S. EBSCO, the Netherlands "Abstracts and Citation Database" (Scopus), the Japan Science and Technology Agency Database (JST), the Russian "Abstract Magazine", the Chinese Biomedical Literature CD-ROM Database (CBMdisc), the Chinese Biomedical Periodical Literature Database (CMCC), the China Academic Journal Network Full-text Database (CNKI), the Chinese Academic Journal (CD-ROM Edition), and the Wanfang Data-Digital Journal Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信