成年男性包皮环切术后龟头缺血:两例患者的系列病例和文献综述。

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1177/03915603241273611
Nicolò Schifano, Paolo Capogrosso, Alessio Villano, Sara Baldini, Gabriele Antonini, Federico Deho'
{"title":"成年男性包皮环切术后龟头缺血:两例患者的系列病例和文献综述。","authors":"Nicolò Schifano, Paolo Capogrosso, Alessio Villano, Sara Baldini, Gabriele Antonini, Federico Deho'","doi":"10.1177/03915603241273611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glans necrosis after circumcision is an exceedingly rare complication among adult males, with only a handful of cases being reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We present here two cases of glans ischaemia observations after circumcision in both a 19-year-old and a 26-year-old patient; both were managed with oral medications in the outpatient setting, with complete restitutio-ad-integrum. A narrative review of the literature was also performed to better describe the possible predisposing factors; the treatment/management options; and the typical outcomes among the adult males experiencing with this complication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Penile dorsal anaesthetic blocks, monopolar cautery usage and compressive wound dressing are all reported to play a role as co-factors for glans ischaemia after circumcision, hence their adoption should be mindful. There is no consensus on the management of ischaemia of the glans after male circumcision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The favourable outcomes being reported for most of the literature cases of glans ischaemia after circumcision among adults despite the adoption of diverse empirical therapeutic strategies suggest that the role of the proactive management may be questionable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"852-860"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glans ischaemia after circumcision in adult males: A two-patient case series and a narrative review of the literature.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolò Schifano, Paolo Capogrosso, Alessio Villano, Sara Baldini, Gabriele Antonini, Federico Deho'\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03915603241273611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glans necrosis after circumcision is an exceedingly rare complication among adult males, with only a handful of cases being reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We present here two cases of glans ischaemia observations after circumcision in both a 19-year-old and a 26-year-old patient; both were managed with oral medications in the outpatient setting, with complete restitutio-ad-integrum. A narrative review of the literature was also performed to better describe the possible predisposing factors; the treatment/management options; and the typical outcomes among the adult males experiencing with this complication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Penile dorsal anaesthetic blocks, monopolar cautery usage and compressive wound dressing are all reported to play a role as co-factors for glans ischaemia after circumcision, hence their adoption should be mindful. There is no consensus on the management of ischaemia of the glans after male circumcision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The favourable outcomes being reported for most of the literature cases of glans ischaemia after circumcision among adults despite the adoption of diverse empirical therapeutic strategies suggest that the role of the proactive management may be questionable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"852-860\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241273611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241273611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:包皮环切术后龟头坏死是成年男性中极为罕见的并发症,文献中仅有少数病例报道:我们在此介绍两例包皮环切术后龟头缺血观察病例,患者分别为 19 岁和 26 岁;两例患者均在门诊接受了口服药物治疗,并完全康复。为了更好地描述可能的诱发因素、治疗/处理方案以及成年男性出现这种并发症的典型结果,我们还对文献进行了叙述性回顾:结果:据报道,阴茎背侧麻醉阻滞、单极烧灼法和加压伤口敷料都是包皮环切术后龟头缺血的共同因素,因此应注意采用这些方法。对于包皮环切术后龟头缺血的处理方法,目前尚未达成共识:结论:尽管采用了多种经验性治疗策略,但大多数成人包皮环切术后龟头缺血的文献报道结果良好,这表明积极治疗的作用可能值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glans ischaemia after circumcision in adult males: A two-patient case series and a narrative review of the literature.

Introduction: Glans necrosis after circumcision is an exceedingly rare complication among adult males, with only a handful of cases being reported in the literature.

Materials and methods: We present here two cases of glans ischaemia observations after circumcision in both a 19-year-old and a 26-year-old patient; both were managed with oral medications in the outpatient setting, with complete restitutio-ad-integrum. A narrative review of the literature was also performed to better describe the possible predisposing factors; the treatment/management options; and the typical outcomes among the adult males experiencing with this complication.

Results: Penile dorsal anaesthetic blocks, monopolar cautery usage and compressive wound dressing are all reported to play a role as co-factors for glans ischaemia after circumcision, hence their adoption should be mindful. There is no consensus on the management of ischaemia of the glans after male circumcision.

Conclusions: The favourable outcomes being reported for most of the literature cases of glans ischaemia after circumcision among adults despite the adoption of diverse empirical therapeutic strategies suggest that the role of the proactive management may be questionable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信