树突状细胞疫苗治疗胶质母细胞瘤:最新荟萃分析和试验序列分析。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s11060-024-04798-w
Chia-En Wong, Yu Chang, Pei-Wen Chen, Yan-Ta Huang, Yu-Cheng Chang, Cho-Han Chiang, Liang-Chao Wang, Po-Hsuan Lee, Chi-Chen Huang, Heng-Juei Hsu, Jung-Shun Lee
{"title":"树突状细胞疫苗治疗胶质母细胞瘤:最新荟萃分析和试验序列分析。","authors":"Chia-En Wong, Yu Chang, Pei-Wen Chen, Yan-Ta Huang, Yu-Cheng Chang, Cho-Han Chiang, Liang-Chao Wang, Po-Hsuan Lee, Chi-Chen Huang, Heng-Juei Hsu, Jung-Shun Lee","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04798-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dendritic cell (DC) vaccine is an emerging immunotherapy that could potentially improve glioblastoma survival. The first phase III clinical trial of DC vaccine was recently published. This meta-analysis aims to update and reappraise existing evidence on the efficacy of DC vaccine in patients with glioblastoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for clinical trials of DC vaccine for glioblastoma. The quality of the studies was assessed using the RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. The results of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled using hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Summary effects were evaluated using random effects models. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven clinical trials involving 3,619 patients were included. DC vaccine plus standard care was associated with significantly improved OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57 - 0.88) and PFS (HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43 - 0.98). In the subgroup of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, DC vaccine was associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 - 0.90). TSA of OS showed that the cumulative z-score line for the DC vaccine crossed the benefit boundary and reached the required sample size. TSA of PFS and subgroup analysis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma showed that the required sample size was not reached.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This updated meta-analysis, which included the first phase III trial of a DC vaccine for glioblastoma, demonstrated that the DC vaccine was associated with improved OS. Moreover, TSA showed that the required sample size was reached, indicating a true-positive result. Future studies are required for patient subgroups with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"253-263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dendritic cell vaccine for glioblastoma: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chia-En Wong, Yu Chang, Pei-Wen Chen, Yan-Ta Huang, Yu-Cheng Chang, Cho-Han Chiang, Liang-Chao Wang, Po-Hsuan Lee, Chi-Chen Huang, Heng-Juei Hsu, Jung-Shun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-024-04798-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dendritic cell (DC) vaccine is an emerging immunotherapy that could potentially improve glioblastoma survival. The first phase III clinical trial of DC vaccine was recently published. This meta-analysis aims to update and reappraise existing evidence on the efficacy of DC vaccine in patients with glioblastoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for clinical trials of DC vaccine for glioblastoma. The quality of the studies was assessed using the RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. The results of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled using hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Summary effects were evaluated using random effects models. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven clinical trials involving 3,619 patients were included. DC vaccine plus standard care was associated with significantly improved OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57 - 0.88) and PFS (HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43 - 0.98). In the subgroup of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, DC vaccine was associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 - 0.90). TSA of OS showed that the cumulative z-score line for the DC vaccine crossed the benefit boundary and reached the required sample size. TSA of PFS and subgroup analysis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma showed that the required sample size was not reached.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This updated meta-analysis, which included the first phase III trial of a DC vaccine for glioblastoma, demonstrated that the DC vaccine was associated with improved OS. Moreover, TSA showed that the required sample size was reached, indicating a true-positive result. Future studies are required for patient subgroups with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"253-263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04798-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04798-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:树突状细胞(DC)疫苗是一种新兴的免疫疗法,有可能提高胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存率。最近公布了首个树突状细胞疫苗 III 期临床试验。本荟萃分析旨在更新和重新评估现有的关于DC疫苗对胶质母细胞瘤患者疗效的证据:我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中有关DC疫苗治疗胶质母细胞瘤的临床试验。研究质量采用 RoB 2.0 和 ROBINS-I 工具进行评估。总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的结果采用危险比(HRs)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)进行汇总。采用随机效应模型评估总结效应。进行了试验序列分析(TSA):结果:共纳入了七项临床试验,涉及 3619 名患者。DC疫苗联合标准治疗可显著改善OS(HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57 - 0.88)和PFS(HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43 - 0.98)。在新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤亚组中,DC疫苗与PFS的改善相关(HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 - 0.90)。OS的TSA显示,DC疫苗的累积z分数线越过了获益边界,达到了所需的样本量。PFS的TSA和新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的亚组分析表明,未达到所需的样本量:这项更新的荟萃分析包括了首个直流电疫苗治疗胶质母细胞瘤的III期试验,结果表明直流电疫苗与OS的改善相关。此外,TSA显示达到了所需的样本量,表明结果为真阳性。未来还需要对新诊断和复发的胶质母细胞瘤患者亚组进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dendritic cell vaccine for glioblastoma: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Dendritic cell vaccine for glioblastoma: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Background: Dendritic cell (DC) vaccine is an emerging immunotherapy that could potentially improve glioblastoma survival. The first phase III clinical trial of DC vaccine was recently published. This meta-analysis aims to update and reappraise existing evidence on the efficacy of DC vaccine in patients with glioblastoma.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for clinical trials of DC vaccine for glioblastoma. The quality of the studies was assessed using the RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. The results of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled using hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Summary effects were evaluated using random effects models. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed.

Results: Seven clinical trials involving 3,619 patients were included. DC vaccine plus standard care was associated with significantly improved OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57 - 0.88) and PFS (HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43 - 0.98). In the subgroup of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, DC vaccine was associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 - 0.90). TSA of OS showed that the cumulative z-score line for the DC vaccine crossed the benefit boundary and reached the required sample size. TSA of PFS and subgroup analysis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma showed that the required sample size was not reached.

Conclusions: This updated meta-analysis, which included the first phase III trial of a DC vaccine for glioblastoma, demonstrated that the DC vaccine was associated with improved OS. Moreover, TSA showed that the required sample size was reached, indicating a true-positive result. Future studies are required for patient subgroups with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信