开角型青光眼和眼压过高症患者对选择性激光小梁成形术的反应。

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yangfan Yang, Kezheng Xu, Zidong Chen, Yuning Zhang, Qiaona Ye, Yu-Tzu Ping, Yanmei Fan, Pingping Liu, Neil Nathwani, Yuzhen Jiang, Gus Gazzard, Minbin Yu
{"title":"开角型青光眼和眼压过高症患者对选择性激光小梁成形术的反应。","authors":"Yangfan Yang, Kezheng Xu, Zidong Chen, Yuning Zhang, Qiaona Ye, Yu-Tzu Ping, Yanmei Fan, Pingping Liu, Neil Nathwani, Yuzhen Jiang, Gus Gazzard, Minbin Yu","doi":"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is becoming the recommended first choice in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). However, whether repeat SLT can be recommended regardless of initial response remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the potential of OAG and ocular hypertension (OHT) undergoing repeat laser to respond favorably to SLT, termed responsiveness to SLT.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This post hoc analysis of the Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial in China (LiGHT China) was conducted from March 2015 to April 2023 in Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center. Of 1376 newly diagnosed OAG and OHT eyes of 771 adults in the original trial, 180 eyes of 105 participants were included in the present study, which underwent initial and repeat SLT as primary treatments.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Standard SLT was the primary treatment. Repeat SLT was the first choice of treatment escalation regardless of initial response. IOP reduction after SLT and the duration of effect were analyzed. The maximum reduction in IOP within 2 years after initial SLT and repeat SLT was used to identify potential nonresponsiveness.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>IOP reduction 2 months after SLT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 180 eyes from 105 Chinese participants (mean [SD] age, 45.6 [14.5] years; 58 [55.2%] male and 47 [44.8%] female) underwent repeat SLT. Initial SLT and repeat SLT were both associated with a reduction in IOP (mean, 4.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, 3.9 to 5.1; P < .001 and mean, 3.3 mm Hg; 95% CI, 2.7 to 3.8; P < .001, respectively). The mean (SD) IOP after repeat SLT was 15.8 (3.4) mm Hg, similar to 16.0 (4.0) mm Hg after initial SLT (difference, -0.4mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.0 to 0.3; P = .24). Duration of effect after repeat SLT was longer than after initial SLT (1043 days vs 419 days; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.50; P < .001). IOP reduction after initial SLT was uncorrelated with that after repeat SLT, and 153 eyes (85.0%) responded favorably to SLT at least once. A subset of 27 eyes (15.0%) was identified as potentially nonresponsive and found distinctive with older age (mean [SD], 54.1 [12.5] years vs 44.2 [14.2] years; difference, 10.5 years; 95% CI, 2.9 to 18.1; P = .009), higher proportion of female participants (difference, 27.5%; 95% CI, 3.6 to 51.5; P = .03), and lower baseline IOP (difference, -3.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, -5.2 to -1.3; P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These post hoc analyses showed that most cases of OAG and OHT were highly responsive to SLT and support the consideration of repeat SLT regardless of initial response, while individuals who are nonresponsive to this treatment may have specific features.</p>","PeriodicalId":14518,"journal":{"name":"JAMA ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"918-924"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsiveness to Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Yangfan Yang, Kezheng Xu, Zidong Chen, Yuning Zhang, Qiaona Ye, Yu-Tzu Ping, Yanmei Fan, Pingping Liu, Neil Nathwani, Yuzhen Jiang, Gus Gazzard, Minbin Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is becoming the recommended first choice in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). However, whether repeat SLT can be recommended regardless of initial response remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the potential of OAG and ocular hypertension (OHT) undergoing repeat laser to respond favorably to SLT, termed responsiveness to SLT.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This post hoc analysis of the Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial in China (LiGHT China) was conducted from March 2015 to April 2023 in Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center. Of 1376 newly diagnosed OAG and OHT eyes of 771 adults in the original trial, 180 eyes of 105 participants were included in the present study, which underwent initial and repeat SLT as primary treatments.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Standard SLT was the primary treatment. Repeat SLT was the first choice of treatment escalation regardless of initial response. IOP reduction after SLT and the duration of effect were analyzed. The maximum reduction in IOP within 2 years after initial SLT and repeat SLT was used to identify potential nonresponsiveness.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>IOP reduction 2 months after SLT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 180 eyes from 105 Chinese participants (mean [SD] age, 45.6 [14.5] years; 58 [55.2%] male and 47 [44.8%] female) underwent repeat SLT. Initial SLT and repeat SLT were both associated with a reduction in IOP (mean, 4.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, 3.9 to 5.1; P < .001 and mean, 3.3 mm Hg; 95% CI, 2.7 to 3.8; P < .001, respectively). The mean (SD) IOP after repeat SLT was 15.8 (3.4) mm Hg, similar to 16.0 (4.0) mm Hg after initial SLT (difference, -0.4mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.0 to 0.3; P = .24). Duration of effect after repeat SLT was longer than after initial SLT (1043 days vs 419 days; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.50; P < .001). IOP reduction after initial SLT was uncorrelated with that after repeat SLT, and 153 eyes (85.0%) responded favorably to SLT at least once. A subset of 27 eyes (15.0%) was identified as potentially nonresponsive and found distinctive with older age (mean [SD], 54.1 [12.5] years vs 44.2 [14.2] years; difference, 10.5 years; 95% CI, 2.9 to 18.1; P = .009), higher proportion of female participants (difference, 27.5%; 95% CI, 3.6 to 51.5; P = .03), and lower baseline IOP (difference, -3.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, -5.2 to -1.3; P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These post hoc analyses showed that most cases of OAG and OHT were highly responsive to SLT and support the consideration of repeat SLT regardless of initial response, while individuals who are nonresponsive to this treatment may have specific features.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"918-924\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342221/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3133\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3133","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)正成为治疗开角型青光眼(OAG)的首选方案。然而,无论初始反应如何,是否建议重复进行 SLT 仍存在争议:目的:评估接受重复激光治疗的开角型青光眼(OAG)和眼压过高(OHT)患者对 SLT 产生良好反应的可能性,即 SLT 反应性:这项对中国青光眼和眼底病激光治疗试验(LiGHT China)的事后分析于 2015 年 3 月至 2023 年 4 月在中山眼科中心进行。在原试验的771名成人的1376只新诊断为OAG和OHT的眼睛中,有105名参与者的180只眼睛被纳入本研究,他们接受了初始和重复SLT作为主要治疗方法:暴露:标准 SLT 是主要治疗方法。无论初始反应如何,重复 SLT 都是治疗升级的首选。研究分析了SLT治疗后的眼压降低情况和疗效持续时间。首次SLT和重复SLT后2年内眼压的最大降幅被用来确定潜在的无反应性:结果:结果:105 名中国参与者共 180 只眼睛(平均 [SD] 年龄 45.6 [14.5] 岁;58 [55.2%] 名男性和 47 [44.8%] 名女性)接受了重复 SLT。首次 SLT 和重复 SLT 都与眼压降低有关(平均值为 4.5 mm Hg;95% CI 为 3.9 至 5.1;P 结论和相关性:这些事后分析表明,大多数 OAG 和 OHT 病例对 SLT 反应强烈,因此无论初始反应如何,都应考虑重复 SLT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responsiveness to Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.

Importance: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is becoming the recommended first choice in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). However, whether repeat SLT can be recommended regardless of initial response remains controversial.

Objective: To assess the potential of OAG and ocular hypertension (OHT) undergoing repeat laser to respond favorably to SLT, termed responsiveness to SLT.

Design, setting, and participants: This post hoc analysis of the Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial in China (LiGHT China) was conducted from March 2015 to April 2023 in Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center. Of 1376 newly diagnosed OAG and OHT eyes of 771 adults in the original trial, 180 eyes of 105 participants were included in the present study, which underwent initial and repeat SLT as primary treatments.

Exposures: Standard SLT was the primary treatment. Repeat SLT was the first choice of treatment escalation regardless of initial response. IOP reduction after SLT and the duration of effect were analyzed. The maximum reduction in IOP within 2 years after initial SLT and repeat SLT was used to identify potential nonresponsiveness.

Main outcomes and measures: IOP reduction 2 months after SLT.

Results: A total of 180 eyes from 105 Chinese participants (mean [SD] age, 45.6 [14.5] years; 58 [55.2%] male and 47 [44.8%] female) underwent repeat SLT. Initial SLT and repeat SLT were both associated with a reduction in IOP (mean, 4.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, 3.9 to 5.1; P < .001 and mean, 3.3 mm Hg; 95% CI, 2.7 to 3.8; P < .001, respectively). The mean (SD) IOP after repeat SLT was 15.8 (3.4) mm Hg, similar to 16.0 (4.0) mm Hg after initial SLT (difference, -0.4mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.0 to 0.3; P = .24). Duration of effect after repeat SLT was longer than after initial SLT (1043 days vs 419 days; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.50; P < .001). IOP reduction after initial SLT was uncorrelated with that after repeat SLT, and 153 eyes (85.0%) responded favorably to SLT at least once. A subset of 27 eyes (15.0%) was identified as potentially nonresponsive and found distinctive with older age (mean [SD], 54.1 [12.5] years vs 44.2 [14.2] years; difference, 10.5 years; 95% CI, 2.9 to 18.1; P = .009), higher proportion of female participants (difference, 27.5%; 95% CI, 3.6 to 51.5; P = .03), and lower baseline IOP (difference, -3.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, -5.2 to -1.3; P = .001).

Conclusions and relevance: These post hoc analyses showed that most cases of OAG and OHT were highly responsive to SLT and support the consideration of repeat SLT regardless of initial response, while individuals who are nonresponsive to this treatment may have specific features.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA ophthalmology
JAMA ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: JAMA Ophthalmology, with a rich history of continuous publication since 1869, stands as a distinguished international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to ophthalmology and visual science. In 2019, the journal proudly commemorated 150 years of uninterrupted service to the field. As a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, a consortium renowned for its peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Ophthalmology upholds the highest standards of excellence in disseminating cutting-edge research and insights. Join us in celebrating our legacy and advancing the frontiers of ophthalmology and visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信