能否通过极端紫外线强度正确预测太阳边缘耀斑?

Jaewon Lee, Yong-Jae Moon, Hyun-Jin Jeong, Kangwoo Yi and Harim Lee
{"title":"能否通过极端紫外线强度正确预测太阳边缘耀斑?","authors":"Jaewon Lee, Yong-Jae Moon, Hyun-Jin Jeong, Kangwoo Yi and Harim Lee","doi":"10.3847/2041-8213/ad6b9b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We address the question of whether the solar limb flare prediction can be properly made by EUV intensity, which has less projection effects than solar white light and magnetogram data. We develop empirical and multilayer perceptron (MLP) models to forecast the probability of a major solar limb flare within a day. We use Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO)/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) 94 and 131 Å that have high correlations and large slopes with X-ray flare fluxes from 2010 to 2022. We select 240 flares stronger than or equal to the M1.0 class and located near the limb region (60° or more in heliographic longitude). For input data, we use the limb intensity as the sum of SDO/AIA intensities in the limb region and the total intensity of the whole image. We compare the model performances using metrics such as the receiver operating characteristic—area under the curve. Our major results are as follows. First, we can forecast major solar limb flare occurrences with only SDO/AIA 94 and/or 131 Å intensities. Second, our models show better probability prediction than the climatological model. Third, both empirical (AUC = 0.85) and MLP (AUC = 0.84) models have similar performances, which are much better than a random forecast (AUC = 0.50). Finally, it is interesting to note that our model can forecast the flaring probability of all 52 events during the test period, while the models in the NASA/CCMC flare scoreboard can forecast only 22 events. From the above results, we can answer that the solar limb flare prediction using EUV intensity can be properly made.","PeriodicalId":501814,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Solar Limb Flare Prediction Be Properly Made by Extreme-ultraviolet Intensities?\",\"authors\":\"Jaewon Lee, Yong-Jae Moon, Hyun-Jin Jeong, Kangwoo Yi and Harim Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3847/2041-8213/ad6b9b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We address the question of whether the solar limb flare prediction can be properly made by EUV intensity, which has less projection effects than solar white light and magnetogram data. We develop empirical and multilayer perceptron (MLP) models to forecast the probability of a major solar limb flare within a day. We use Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO)/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) 94 and 131 Å that have high correlations and large slopes with X-ray flare fluxes from 2010 to 2022. We select 240 flares stronger than or equal to the M1.0 class and located near the limb region (60° or more in heliographic longitude). For input data, we use the limb intensity as the sum of SDO/AIA intensities in the limb region and the total intensity of the whole image. We compare the model performances using metrics such as the receiver operating characteristic—area under the curve. Our major results are as follows. First, we can forecast major solar limb flare occurrences with only SDO/AIA 94 and/or 131 Å intensities. Second, our models show better probability prediction than the climatological model. Third, both empirical (AUC = 0.85) and MLP (AUC = 0.84) models have similar performances, which are much better than a random forecast (AUC = 0.50). Finally, it is interesting to note that our model can forecast the flaring probability of all 52 events during the test period, while the models in the NASA/CCMC flare scoreboard can forecast only 22 events. From the above results, we can answer that the solar limb flare prediction using EUV intensity can be properly made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Astrophysical Journal Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Astrophysical Journal Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad6b9b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad6b9b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与太阳白光和磁图数据相比,超紫外辐射强度的投影效应较小,因此我们探讨了能否通过超紫外辐射强度正确预测日珥耀斑的问题。我们开发了经验模型和多层感知器(MLP)模型来预测一天内发生大日缘耀斑的概率。我们使用了太阳动力学天文台(SDO)/大气成像组件(AIA)94 和 131 Å 的数据,这些数据与 2010 年至 2022 年的 X 射线耀斑通量具有很高的相关性和很大的斜率。我们选择了 240 个强度大于或等于 M1.0 级、位于边缘区域附近(日影经度 60° 或以上)的耀斑。在输入数据方面,我们使用边缘强度作为边缘区域的 SDO/AIA 强度与整个图像的总强度之和。我们使用接收器工作特性曲线下面积等指标来比较模型的性能。我们的主要结果如下。首先,我们可以仅利用 SDO/AIA 94 和/或 131 Å 强度预报主要的日珥耀斑发生。其次,我们的模型比气候学模型显示出更好的概率预测。第三,经验模型(AUC = 0.85)和 MLP 模型(AUC = 0.84)的性能相似,都比随机预测(AUC = 0.50)好得多。最后,值得注意的是,我们的模型可以预测测试期间所有 52 个事件的耀斑概率,而 NASA/CCMC 耀斑记分牌中的模型只能预测 22 个事件。从上述结果中,我们可以得出结论:利用 EUV 强度预测日缘耀斑是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Solar Limb Flare Prediction Be Properly Made by Extreme-ultraviolet Intensities?
We address the question of whether the solar limb flare prediction can be properly made by EUV intensity, which has less projection effects than solar white light and magnetogram data. We develop empirical and multilayer perceptron (MLP) models to forecast the probability of a major solar limb flare within a day. We use Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO)/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) 94 and 131 Å that have high correlations and large slopes with X-ray flare fluxes from 2010 to 2022. We select 240 flares stronger than or equal to the M1.0 class and located near the limb region (60° or more in heliographic longitude). For input data, we use the limb intensity as the sum of SDO/AIA intensities in the limb region and the total intensity of the whole image. We compare the model performances using metrics such as the receiver operating characteristic—area under the curve. Our major results are as follows. First, we can forecast major solar limb flare occurrences with only SDO/AIA 94 and/or 131 Å intensities. Second, our models show better probability prediction than the climatological model. Third, both empirical (AUC = 0.85) and MLP (AUC = 0.84) models have similar performances, which are much better than a random forecast (AUC = 0.50). Finally, it is interesting to note that our model can forecast the flaring probability of all 52 events during the test period, while the models in the NASA/CCMC flare scoreboard can forecast only 22 events. From the above results, we can answer that the solar limb flare prediction using EUV intensity can be properly made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信