DECISION 项目:脊柱手法疗法治疗腰背痛:研究方案

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
MethodsX Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2024.102908
Lobke P. De la Ruelle , Annemarie de Zoete , Raymond Ostelo , G. Ardine de Wit , Marianne H. Donker , Sidney M. Rubinstein
{"title":"DECISION 项目:脊柱手法疗法治疗腰背痛:研究方案","authors":"Lobke P. De la Ruelle ,&nbsp;Annemarie de Zoete ,&nbsp;Raymond Ostelo ,&nbsp;G. Ardine de Wit ,&nbsp;Marianne H. Donker ,&nbsp;Sidney M. Rubinstein","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2024.102908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The smallest worthwhile effect (SWE) is the smallest beneficial effect of an intervention that justifies the costs, risks, and inconveniences. The objective is to establish the SWE of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), and to gain insight into how different attributes of the treatment are traded among each other when choosing SMT. Part 1. A mixed-methods study will be conducted to establish and prioritize a list of attributes influencing choices for those who consider SMT for the treatment of LBP. Individual interviews and consensus groups with chiropractors, manual therapists, and osteopaths and their patients will be conducted. Interviews and consensus groups will be voice-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Part 2. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) will be conducted among people with LBP who have limited to no experience with SMT. Participants will be recruited through an online independent panel company. The survey will consist of several choice sets with attributes and their levels established from Part 1. The DCE will be preceded by a short survey to understand the clinical aspects (i.e. presentation, history and previous treatment for LBP) as well as socio-demographic characteristics of the participants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18446,"journal":{"name":"MethodsX","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 102908"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016124003601/pdfft?md5=4c8367158fbdaee365e2a9441e6c2514&pid=1-s2.0-S2215016124003601-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The DECISION project: DiscrEte Choice experIment Spinal manipulative therapy for lOw back paiN: A study protocol\",\"authors\":\"Lobke P. De la Ruelle ,&nbsp;Annemarie de Zoete ,&nbsp;Raymond Ostelo ,&nbsp;G. Ardine de Wit ,&nbsp;Marianne H. Donker ,&nbsp;Sidney M. Rubinstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mex.2024.102908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The smallest worthwhile effect (SWE) is the smallest beneficial effect of an intervention that justifies the costs, risks, and inconveniences. The objective is to establish the SWE of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), and to gain insight into how different attributes of the treatment are traded among each other when choosing SMT. Part 1. A mixed-methods study will be conducted to establish and prioritize a list of attributes influencing choices for those who consider SMT for the treatment of LBP. Individual interviews and consensus groups with chiropractors, manual therapists, and osteopaths and their patients will be conducted. Interviews and consensus groups will be voice-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Part 2. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) will be conducted among people with LBP who have limited to no experience with SMT. Participants will be recruited through an online independent panel company. The survey will consist of several choice sets with attributes and their levels established from Part 1. The DCE will be preceded by a short survey to understand the clinical aspects (i.e. presentation, history and previous treatment for LBP) as well as socio-demographic characteristics of the participants.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MethodsX\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102908\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016124003601/pdfft?md5=4c8367158fbdaee365e2a9441e6c2514&pid=1-s2.0-S2215016124003601-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MethodsX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016124003601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MethodsX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016124003601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最小值得效应(SWE)是指一项干预措施所产生的最小有益效应,该效应足以证明其成本、风险和不便是合理的。本研究旨在确定脊柱手法治疗(SMT)治疗腰背痛(LBP)的最小值得效应(SWE),并深入了解在选择脊柱手法治疗时如何对治疗的不同属性进行权衡。第 1 部分.将开展一项混合方法研究,以确定影响那些考虑采用 SMT 治疗腰背痛的人的选择的属性列表,并对其进行优先排序。将对脊骨神经科医生、手法治疗师、骨科医生及其患者进行个人访谈和共识小组讨论。访谈和共识小组将进行录音和逐字记录。第二部分:离散选择实验离散选择实验 (DCE) 将在对 SMT 经验有限或毫无经验的 LBP 患者中进行。参与者将通过一家在线独立小组公司招募。调查将由几个选择集组成,属性及其等级由第 1 部分确定。在进行 DCE 之前,将先进行一项简短的调查,以了解参与者的临床情况(即表现、病史和以前的腰椎间盘突出症治疗情况)以及社会人口特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The DECISION project: DiscrEte Choice experIment Spinal manipulative therapy for lOw back paiN: A study protocol

The DECISION project: DiscrEte Choice experIment Spinal manipulative therapy for lOw back paiN: A study protocol

The smallest worthwhile effect (SWE) is the smallest beneficial effect of an intervention that justifies the costs, risks, and inconveniences. The objective is to establish the SWE of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), and to gain insight into how different attributes of the treatment are traded among each other when choosing SMT. Part 1. A mixed-methods study will be conducted to establish and prioritize a list of attributes influencing choices for those who consider SMT for the treatment of LBP. Individual interviews and consensus groups with chiropractors, manual therapists, and osteopaths and their patients will be conducted. Interviews and consensus groups will be voice-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Part 2. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) will be conducted among people with LBP who have limited to no experience with SMT. Participants will be recruited through an online independent panel company. The survey will consist of several choice sets with attributes and their levels established from Part 1. The DCE will be preceded by a short survey to understand the clinical aspects (i.e. presentation, history and previous treatment for LBP) as well as socio-demographic characteristics of the participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MethodsX
MethodsX Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
314
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信