治疗皮肤移植物抗宿主病的光疗:系统综述。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Tahel Fachler-Sharp, Inbar Kobal, Sivan Sheffer-Levi, Adiel Cohen, Ayal Hassidim, Vered Molho-Pessach, Rony Shreberk-Hassidim
{"title":"治疗皮肤移植物抗宿主病的光疗:系统综述。","authors":"Tahel Fachler-Sharp, Inbar Kobal, Sivan Sheffer-Levi, Adiel Cohen, Ayal Hassidim, Vered Molho-Pessach, Rony Shreberk-Hassidim","doi":"10.1111/phpp.12997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Phototherapy has been used to treat cutaneous GVHD, but data on its safety and efficacy are sparse.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Review the current medical literature regarding the efficacy, dosing, and safety of various types of phototherapies for the treatment of cutaneous GVHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials databases was performed. Publications were screened according to the PRISMA guidelines. Exclusion criteria comprised case reports and case series reporting less than five patients, review articles, and articles not published in English.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28/1304 (2.5%) studies were included. Fifteen studies (n = 267 patients) focused on psoralen and ultraviolet (UV) A (PUVA), in which 65.5% of patients received concomitantly other systemic treatments. The response rate was 89.9%, with a mean of 33.2 treatments. Adverse events were recorded in 54% but were mainly mild. Eight studies, encompassing 95 patients, focused on narrow-band (NB) UVB. A response was observed in 94%, with a mean number of 26 treatments and 8.6% adverse effects. UVA1 was reported in six studies (n = 132 patients). A response was recorded in 89.3% with a mean of 26.2 treatments. Adverse events were noted in 70.1%, with a discontinuation rate of 10.9%. It should be noted that adverse events were recorded during the follow-up period of the studies, which varied significantly, ranging from no follow-up to 31 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current data regarding the use of phototherapy for the treatment of cutaneous GVHD are based on retrospective studies and case series. The present report advocates the use of one of the three modalities of phototherapy as an effective and safe adjunctive treatment for cutaneous GVHD, especially NB UVB phototherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20123,"journal":{"name":"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine","volume":"40 5","pages":"e12997"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phototherapy for the treatment of cutaneous graft-versus-host disease: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Tahel Fachler-Sharp, Inbar Kobal, Sivan Sheffer-Levi, Adiel Cohen, Ayal Hassidim, Vered Molho-Pessach, Rony Shreberk-Hassidim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/phpp.12997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Phototherapy has been used to treat cutaneous GVHD, but data on its safety and efficacy are sparse.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Review the current medical literature regarding the efficacy, dosing, and safety of various types of phototherapies for the treatment of cutaneous GVHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials databases was performed. Publications were screened according to the PRISMA guidelines. Exclusion criteria comprised case reports and case series reporting less than five patients, review articles, and articles not published in English.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28/1304 (2.5%) studies were included. Fifteen studies (n = 267 patients) focused on psoralen and ultraviolet (UV) A (PUVA), in which 65.5% of patients received concomitantly other systemic treatments. The response rate was 89.9%, with a mean of 33.2 treatments. Adverse events were recorded in 54% but were mainly mild. Eight studies, encompassing 95 patients, focused on narrow-band (NB) UVB. A response was observed in 94%, with a mean number of 26 treatments and 8.6% adverse effects. UVA1 was reported in six studies (n = 132 patients). A response was recorded in 89.3% with a mean of 26.2 treatments. Adverse events were noted in 70.1%, with a discontinuation rate of 10.9%. It should be noted that adverse events were recorded during the follow-up period of the studies, which varied significantly, ranging from no follow-up to 31 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current data regarding the use of phototherapy for the treatment of cutaneous GVHD are based on retrospective studies and case series. The present report advocates the use of one of the three modalities of phototherapy as an effective and safe adjunctive treatment for cutaneous GVHD, especially NB UVB phototherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"e12997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12997\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:皮肤移植物抗宿主疾病(GVHD)是异基因造血干细胞移植的常见并发症。光疗已被用于治疗皮肤移植物抗宿主疾病,但有关其安全性和有效性的数据却很少。目的:回顾目前有关治疗皮肤移植物抗宿主疾病的各类光疗的有效性、剂量和安全性的医学文献:方法:对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 和 ClinicalTrials 数据库进行了系统回顾。根据 PRISMA 指南筛选文献。排除标准包括报告少于五例患者的病例报告和病例系列、综述文章以及非英文发表的文章:共纳入 28/1304 (2.5%) 项研究。其中15项研究(n = 267名患者)关注补骨脂素和紫外线(UV)A(PUVA),65.5%的患者同时接受了其他系统治疗。应答率为 89.9%,平均治疗次数为 33.2 次。54%的患者出现了不良反应,但以轻微为主。八项研究共涉及 95 名患者,主要针对窄带(NB)紫外线。94%的患者出现了反应,平均治疗次数为 26 次,不良反应发生率为 8.6%。六项研究报告了 UVA1(n = 132 名患者)。89.3%的患者有反应,平均治疗次数为 26.2 次。70.1%的患者出现了不良反应,停药率为 10.9%。值得注意的是,不良反应是在研究的随访期内记录的,随访期差异很大,从没有随访到31个月不等:结论:目前有关使用光疗治疗皮肤GVHD的数据都是基于回顾性研究和系列病例。本报告提倡使用三种光疗方式中的一种作为治疗皮肤GVHD的有效、安全的辅助疗法,尤其是NB UVB光疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phototherapy for the treatment of cutaneous graft-versus-host disease: A systematic review.

Background: Cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Phototherapy has been used to treat cutaneous GVHD, but data on its safety and efficacy are sparse.

Aim: Review the current medical literature regarding the efficacy, dosing, and safety of various types of phototherapies for the treatment of cutaneous GVHD.

Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials databases was performed. Publications were screened according to the PRISMA guidelines. Exclusion criteria comprised case reports and case series reporting less than five patients, review articles, and articles not published in English.

Results: A total of 28/1304 (2.5%) studies were included. Fifteen studies (n = 267 patients) focused on psoralen and ultraviolet (UV) A (PUVA), in which 65.5% of patients received concomitantly other systemic treatments. The response rate was 89.9%, with a mean of 33.2 treatments. Adverse events were recorded in 54% but were mainly mild. Eight studies, encompassing 95 patients, focused on narrow-band (NB) UVB. A response was observed in 94%, with a mean number of 26 treatments and 8.6% adverse effects. UVA1 was reported in six studies (n = 132 patients). A response was recorded in 89.3% with a mean of 26.2 treatments. Adverse events were noted in 70.1%, with a discontinuation rate of 10.9%. It should be noted that adverse events were recorded during the follow-up period of the studies, which varied significantly, ranging from no follow-up to 31 months.

Conclusions: Current data regarding the use of phototherapy for the treatment of cutaneous GVHD are based on retrospective studies and case series. The present report advocates the use of one of the three modalities of phototherapy as an effective and safe adjunctive treatment for cutaneous GVHD, especially NB UVB phototherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is a forum for new information about the direct and distant effects of electromagnetic radiation (ultraviolet, visible and infrared) mediated through skin. The divisions of the editorial board reflect areas of specific interest: aging, carcinogenesis, immunology, instrumentation and optics, lasers, photodynamic therapy, photosensitivity, pigmentation and therapy. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine includes original articles, reviews, communications and editorials. Original articles may include the investigation of experimental or pathological processes in humans or animals in vivo or the investigation of radiation effects in cells or tissues in vitro. Methodology need have no limitation; rather, it should be appropriate to the question addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信