产后早期和晚期三维肛门内超声波检查的可靠性。

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov
{"title":"产后早期和晚期三维肛门内超声波检查的可靠性。","authors":"Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There is no consensus on how to define obstetric anal sphincter defects detected by 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS), and the reported rates vary significantly in the postpartum period.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to establish a diagnostic strategy with a high and clinically relevant interrater reliability both early and late postpartum.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The study was prospective and observational, and 3D-EAUS was performed 10-14 days and 9-12 months postpartum in an unselected cohort of primiparous women with vacuum-assisted deliveries. Two experienced examiners evaluated the ultrasonographic results, which were divided into the categories intact, inconclusive, small, moderate, and large defects based on Starck scores. Three different diagnostic strategies were validated, and the prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) values calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 334 eligible women, 184 (55.1%) completed both examinations. Disagreements involving small defects were predominant and observed in 34 and 39 cases, respectively, at the 2 time points. The highest overall agreement rates (91.3% and 92.4%, respectively) and PABAK values (0.83 and 0.85, respectively) were reached when the disagreements were minimized by dichotomizing the results into Starck scores >4 (designated a significant defect) versus Starck scores 0-4 (all others).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The interrater reliability of detecting small anal sphincter defects by 3D-EAUS was low at both time points for the 2 experienced raters. In contrast, the interrater reliability of detecting a significant defect was classified as almost perfect agreement at both time points.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reliability of 3-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasonography Early and Late Postpartum.\",\"authors\":\"Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There is no consensus on how to define obstetric anal sphincter defects detected by 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS), and the reported rates vary significantly in the postpartum period.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to establish a diagnostic strategy with a high and clinically relevant interrater reliability both early and late postpartum.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The study was prospective and observational, and 3D-EAUS was performed 10-14 days and 9-12 months postpartum in an unselected cohort of primiparous women with vacuum-assisted deliveries. Two experienced examiners evaluated the ultrasonographic results, which were divided into the categories intact, inconclusive, small, moderate, and large defects based on Starck scores. Three different diagnostic strategies were validated, and the prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) values calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 334 eligible women, 184 (55.1%) completed both examinations. Disagreements involving small defects were predominant and observed in 34 and 39 cases, respectively, at the 2 time points. The highest overall agreement rates (91.3% and 92.4%, respectively) and PABAK values (0.83 and 0.85, respectively) were reached when the disagreements were minimized by dichotomizing the results into Starck scores >4 (designated a significant defect) versus Starck scores 0-4 (all others).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The interrater reliability of detecting small anal sphincter defects by 3D-EAUS was low at both time points for the 2 experienced raters. In contrast, the interrater reliability of detecting a significant defect was classified as almost perfect agreement at both time points.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:对于如何定义三维肛门内超声(3D-EAUS)检测到的产科肛门括约肌缺损,目前尚未达成共识,产后报告的比例也有很大差异:研究设计:研究设计:该研究为前瞻性观察性研究,在未经选择的真空助产初产妇群中,分别于产后 10-14 天和 9-12 个月进行 3D-EAUS 检查。两名经验丰富的检查员对超声波检查结果进行评估,并根据斯塔克评分将结果分为完好、不确定、小、中、大缺损等类别。对三种不同的诊断策略进行了验证,并计算了患病率和偏倚调整卡帕(PABAK)值:在 334 名符合条件的妇女中,184 人(55.1%)完成了两次检查。在两个时间点观察到的分歧主要涉及小缺陷,分别为 34 例和 39 例。通过将结果分为Starck评分>4分(指定为重大缺陷)和Starck评分0-4分(所有其他缺陷),将分歧最小化,从而达到最高的总体一致率(分别为91.3%和92.4%)和PABAK值(分别为0.83和0.85):结论:在两个时间点上,两名经验丰富的评分员通过 3D-EAUS 检测肛门括约肌小缺损的评分间可靠性都很低。相比之下,在两个时间点上,检测重大缺陷的评分者间可靠性几乎完全一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Reliability of 3-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasonography Early and Late Postpartum.

Importance: There is no consensus on how to define obstetric anal sphincter defects detected by 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS), and the reported rates vary significantly in the postpartum period.

Objective: The objective of this study was to establish a diagnostic strategy with a high and clinically relevant interrater reliability both early and late postpartum.

Study design: The study was prospective and observational, and 3D-EAUS was performed 10-14 days and 9-12 months postpartum in an unselected cohort of primiparous women with vacuum-assisted deliveries. Two experienced examiners evaluated the ultrasonographic results, which were divided into the categories intact, inconclusive, small, moderate, and large defects based on Starck scores. Three different diagnostic strategies were validated, and the prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) values calculated.

Results: Of 334 eligible women, 184 (55.1%) completed both examinations. Disagreements involving small defects were predominant and observed in 34 and 39 cases, respectively, at the 2 time points. The highest overall agreement rates (91.3% and 92.4%, respectively) and PABAK values (0.83 and 0.85, respectively) were reached when the disagreements were minimized by dichotomizing the results into Starck scores >4 (designated a significant defect) versus Starck scores 0-4 (all others).

Conclusions: The interrater reliability of detecting small anal sphincter defects by 3D-EAUS was low at both time points for the 2 experienced raters. In contrast, the interrater reliability of detecting a significant defect was classified as almost perfect agreement at both time points.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信