一项国际多中心事后分析比较了重症监护室术后恢复门诊中的现场和虚拟用药管理策略。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Aeryana N Beaudrie-Nunn, Janelle O Poyant, Christine M Groth, Stephen H Rappaport, Rachel M Kruer, Emily Miller, Jessica A Whitten, Allyson M Mcintire, Cara M McDaniel, Kevin D Betthauser, Rima A Mohammad, Michael T Kenes, Rebecca Bookstavar Korona, Alexandra E Barber, Pamela MacTavish, Deepali Dixit, Siu Yan A Yeung, Joanna L Stollings
{"title":"一项国际多中心事后分析比较了重症监护室术后恢复门诊中的现场和虚拟用药管理策略。","authors":"Aeryana N Beaudrie-Nunn, Janelle O Poyant, Christine M Groth, Stephen H Rappaport, Rachel M Kruer, Emily Miller, Jessica A Whitten, Allyson M Mcintire, Cara M McDaniel, Kevin D Betthauser, Rima A Mohammad, Michael T Kenes, Rebecca Bookstavar Korona, Alexandra E Barber, Pamela MacTavish, Deepali Dixit, Siu Yan A Yeung, Joanna L Stollings","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxae244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the incidence of ICU pharmacist interventions in intensive care unit recovery center (ICU-RC) in-person and virtual clinic visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a post hoc analysis of interventions implemented by ICU pharmacists among adult patients who were referred to 12 ICU-RCs across the United States and the United Kingdom between September 2019 and July 2021, as reported in the previously published study \"An International, Multicenter Evaluation of Comprehensive Medication Management by Pharmacists in ICU Recovery Centers.\" That study included patients who received a comprehensive medication review by an ICU pharmacist. Medication-related interventions performed by an ICU pharmacist during ICU-RC in-person clinic visits were compared to those performed during virtual clinic visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 507 patients referred to an ICU-RC, of whom 474 patients attended a clinic visit. Of those, 472 received a comprehensive medication review, with 313 patients attending in-person visits and 159 patients attending virtual visits. The incidence of medication-related interventions implemented was higher in the ICU-RC in-person clinic group compared to the virtual clinic group (86.5% vs 79.2%, P = 0.04). There was no difference in the median number of ICU pharmacist interventions per patient between the in-person and virtual clinic groups (2 vs 2, P = 0.13). An ICU admission diagnosis was an independent predictor of medication-related interventions among all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of ICU pharmacist interventions was higher at ICU-RC in-person clinic visits compared to virtual clinic visits. Pharmacists aid in meeting the complex pharmacologic challenges of post-intensive care syndrome in both settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"e262-e273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An international, multicenter post hoc analysis comparing in-person and virtual medication management strategies in post-ICU recovery clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Aeryana N Beaudrie-Nunn, Janelle O Poyant, Christine M Groth, Stephen H Rappaport, Rachel M Kruer, Emily Miller, Jessica A Whitten, Allyson M Mcintire, Cara M McDaniel, Kevin D Betthauser, Rima A Mohammad, Michael T Kenes, Rebecca Bookstavar Korona, Alexandra E Barber, Pamela MacTavish, Deepali Dixit, Siu Yan A Yeung, Joanna L Stollings\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajhp/zxae244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the incidence of ICU pharmacist interventions in intensive care unit recovery center (ICU-RC) in-person and virtual clinic visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a post hoc analysis of interventions implemented by ICU pharmacists among adult patients who were referred to 12 ICU-RCs across the United States and the United Kingdom between September 2019 and July 2021, as reported in the previously published study \\\"An International, Multicenter Evaluation of Comprehensive Medication Management by Pharmacists in ICU Recovery Centers.\\\" That study included patients who received a comprehensive medication review by an ICU pharmacist. Medication-related interventions performed by an ICU pharmacist during ICU-RC in-person clinic visits were compared to those performed during virtual clinic visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 507 patients referred to an ICU-RC, of whom 474 patients attended a clinic visit. Of those, 472 received a comprehensive medication review, with 313 patients attending in-person visits and 159 patients attending virtual visits. The incidence of medication-related interventions implemented was higher in the ICU-RC in-person clinic group compared to the virtual clinic group (86.5% vs 79.2%, P = 0.04). There was no difference in the median number of ICU pharmacist interventions per patient between the in-person and virtual clinic groups (2 vs 2, P = 0.13). An ICU admission diagnosis was an independent predictor of medication-related interventions among all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of ICU pharmacist interventions was higher at ICU-RC in-person clinic visits compared to virtual clinic visits. Pharmacists aid in meeting the complex pharmacologic challenges of post-intensive care syndrome in both settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e262-e273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免责声明:为了加快文章的出版速度,AJHP在接受稿件后会尽快在网上发布。被录用的稿件已经过同行评审和校对,但在进行技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。目的:比较重症监护病房康复中心(ICU-RC)药剂师亲自出诊和虚拟出诊干预的发生率:这是对2019年9月至2021年7月期间转诊至美国和英国12个ICU-RC的成年患者中ICU药剂师实施干预的事后分析,如之前发表的研究报告 "ICU康复中心药剂师综合用药管理的国际多中心评估 "所述。该研究纳入了接受重症监护室药剂师全面用药检查的患者。将 ICU-RC 药师在 ICU-RC 亲临门诊时实施的药物相关干预措施与虚拟门诊时实施的干预措施进行了比较:结果:共有 507 名患者转诊至 ICU-RC,其中 474 名患者接受了门诊访问。其中,472 名患者接受了全面的用药检查,313 名患者接受了亲临门诊,159 名患者接受了虚拟门诊。与虚拟门诊组相比,ICU-RC 现场门诊组实施药物相关干预的比例更高(86.5% vs 79.2%,P = 0.04)。ICU药剂师对每位患者的干预次数中位数在亲临现场组和虚拟诊所组之间没有差异(2 vs 2,P = 0.13)。ICU入院诊断是所有患者接受药物相关干预的独立预测因素:结论:与虚拟门诊相比,ICU-RC 现场门诊中 ICU 药剂师干预的发生率更高。药剂师在这两种情况下都有助于应对重症监护后综合征的复杂药物挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An international, multicenter post hoc analysis comparing in-person and virtual medication management strategies in post-ICU recovery clinics.

Purpose: To compare the incidence of ICU pharmacist interventions in intensive care unit recovery center (ICU-RC) in-person and virtual clinic visits.

Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of interventions implemented by ICU pharmacists among adult patients who were referred to 12 ICU-RCs across the United States and the United Kingdom between September 2019 and July 2021, as reported in the previously published study "An International, Multicenter Evaluation of Comprehensive Medication Management by Pharmacists in ICU Recovery Centers." That study included patients who received a comprehensive medication review by an ICU pharmacist. Medication-related interventions performed by an ICU pharmacist during ICU-RC in-person clinic visits were compared to those performed during virtual clinic visits.

Results: There were 507 patients referred to an ICU-RC, of whom 474 patients attended a clinic visit. Of those, 472 received a comprehensive medication review, with 313 patients attending in-person visits and 159 patients attending virtual visits. The incidence of medication-related interventions implemented was higher in the ICU-RC in-person clinic group compared to the virtual clinic group (86.5% vs 79.2%, P = 0.04). There was no difference in the median number of ICU pharmacist interventions per patient between the in-person and virtual clinic groups (2 vs 2, P = 0.13). An ICU admission diagnosis was an independent predictor of medication-related interventions among all patients.

Conclusion: The incidence of ICU pharmacist interventions was higher at ICU-RC in-person clinic visits compared to virtual clinic visits. Pharmacists aid in meeting the complex pharmacologic challenges of post-intensive care syndrome in both settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信