对医生治疗病情复杂的青少年和年轻成年人的医疗法律风险进行回顾性分析,从中汲取经验教训。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Rana Aslanova M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D. , Laura Payant M.Sc.N. , Richard Liu M.Sc. , Karen Pacheco M.Sc. , Jacqueline H. Fortier M.Sc. , Gary E. Garber M.D.
{"title":"对医生治疗病情复杂的青少年和年轻成年人的医疗法律风险进行回顾性分析,从中汲取经验教训。","authors":"Rana Aslanova M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Laura Payant M.Sc.N. ,&nbsp;Richard Liu M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Karen Pacheco M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Jacqueline H. Fortier M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Gary E. Garber M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.06.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Adolescent and young adult patients occupy a clinically transitional space between pediatric and adult care. Youth with chronic conditions and special healthcare needs may have trouble accessing and receiving appropriate care in this transition, which may lead to patient safety issues and medicolegal risks for physicians. The objectives of this article were to explore patient safety issues and identify medicolegal risks for physicians.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A national repository was retrospectively searched for medicolegal cases (MLCs) involving complaints from youth. The study included MLCs closed at the Canadian Medical Protective Association between 2013 and 2022 involving youth. The study participants were adolescents and young adults aged ≥ 15 and ≤ 21 years with medical complexity. The frequencies and proportions of patient safety events and medicolegal risks for physicians were calculated by exploring factors that contributed to each incident using established frameworks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 182 eligible MLCs were identified. Of 206 involved physicians, 55 were psychiatrists. The most common reasons for patient complaints were deficient assessment, diagnostic error, and communication breakdown with the patient and/or family. More than half of the cases were related to a harmful incident. Peer experts reviewed the cases and identified factors such as a deficient assessment, a failure to perform a test or intervention, failure to refer the patient, and insufficient provider knowledge/skill as contributing to the patient safety event.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The impact of our findings is to identify gaps in care delivery to youth that can inform practitioners of ways to mitigate the gaps and improve patient care and health outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56278,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Health","volume":"75 5","pages":"Pages 750-756"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons Learned From a Retrospective Analysis of Medicolegal Risks for Physicians Treated Adolescents and Young Adults With Medical Complexity\",\"authors\":\"Rana Aslanova M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Laura Payant M.Sc.N. ,&nbsp;Richard Liu M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Karen Pacheco M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Jacqueline H. Fortier M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Gary E. Garber M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.06.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Adolescent and young adult patients occupy a clinically transitional space between pediatric and adult care. Youth with chronic conditions and special healthcare needs may have trouble accessing and receiving appropriate care in this transition, which may lead to patient safety issues and medicolegal risks for physicians. The objectives of this article were to explore patient safety issues and identify medicolegal risks for physicians.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A national repository was retrospectively searched for medicolegal cases (MLCs) involving complaints from youth. The study included MLCs closed at the Canadian Medical Protective Association between 2013 and 2022 involving youth. The study participants were adolescents and young adults aged ≥ 15 and ≤ 21 years with medical complexity. The frequencies and proportions of patient safety events and medicolegal risks for physicians were calculated by exploring factors that contributed to each incident using established frameworks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 182 eligible MLCs were identified. Of 206 involved physicians, 55 were psychiatrists. The most common reasons for patient complaints were deficient assessment, diagnostic error, and communication breakdown with the patient and/or family. More than half of the cases were related to a harmful incident. Peer experts reviewed the cases and identified factors such as a deficient assessment, a failure to perform a test or intervention, failure to refer the patient, and insufficient provider knowledge/skill as contributing to the patient safety event.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The impact of our findings is to identify gaps in care delivery to youth that can inform practitioners of ways to mitigate the gaps and improve patient care and health outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adolescent Health\",\"volume\":\"75 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 750-756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adolescent Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X24003112\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X24003112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:青少年和年轻成人患者在临床上处于儿科和成人护理之间的过渡空间。在这一过渡时期,患有慢性疾病和有特殊医疗需求的青少年可能难以获得和接受适当的护理,这可能会导致患者安全问题和医生的医疗法律风险。本文旨在探讨患者安全问题并确定医生的医疗法律风险:方法:回顾性检索了一个全国性资料库中涉及青少年投诉的医疗法律案件(MLCs)。该研究包括加拿大医学保护协会在 2013 年至 2022 年期间结案的涉及青少年的医学法律案件。研究对象是年龄≥15岁和≤21岁、病情复杂的青少年和年轻成年人。通过使用既定框架探索导致每起事件的因素,计算出患者安全事件和医生医疗法律风险的频率和比例:结果:共发现了 182 起符合条件的医疗事故。在 206 名涉案医生中,55 人为精神科医生。患者投诉的最常见原因是评估不足、诊断错误以及与患者和/或家属沟通不畅。半数以上的病例与有害事件有关。同行专家对这些病例进行了审查,发现导致患者安全事件的因素包括评估不足、未能进行测试或干预、未能转诊患者以及医疗服务提供者的知识/技能不足:讨论:我们的研究结果有助于发现在为青少年提供医疗服务方面存在的不足,从而让从业人员了解如何缩小差距,改善患者的医疗服务和健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons Learned From a Retrospective Analysis of Medicolegal Risks for Physicians Treated Adolescents and Young Adults With Medical Complexity

Purpose

Adolescent and young adult patients occupy a clinically transitional space between pediatric and adult care. Youth with chronic conditions and special healthcare needs may have trouble accessing and receiving appropriate care in this transition, which may lead to patient safety issues and medicolegal risks for physicians. The objectives of this article were to explore patient safety issues and identify medicolegal risks for physicians.

Methods

A national repository was retrospectively searched for medicolegal cases (MLCs) involving complaints from youth. The study included MLCs closed at the Canadian Medical Protective Association between 2013 and 2022 involving youth. The study participants were adolescents and young adults aged ≥ 15 and ≤ 21 years with medical complexity. The frequencies and proportions of patient safety events and medicolegal risks for physicians were calculated by exploring factors that contributed to each incident using established frameworks.

Results

A total of 182 eligible MLCs were identified. Of 206 involved physicians, 55 were psychiatrists. The most common reasons for patient complaints were deficient assessment, diagnostic error, and communication breakdown with the patient and/or family. More than half of the cases were related to a harmful incident. Peer experts reviewed the cases and identified factors such as a deficient assessment, a failure to perform a test or intervention, failure to refer the patient, and insufficient provider knowledge/skill as contributing to the patient safety event.

Discussion

The impact of our findings is to identify gaps in care delivery to youth that can inform practitioners of ways to mitigate the gaps and improve patient care and health outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescent Health
Journal of Adolescent Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.90%
发文量
526
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescent Health is a scientific publication dedicated to enhancing the health and well-being of adolescents and young adults. Our Journal covers a broad range of research topics, spanning from the basic biological and behavioral sciences to public health and policy. We welcome a variety of contributions, including original research papers, concise reports, literature reviews, clinical case reports, opinion pieces, and letters to the editor. We encourage professionals from diverse disciplines such as Anthropology, Education, Ethics, Global Health, Health Services Research, Law, Medicine, Mental and Behavioral Health, Nursing, Nutrition, Psychology, Public Health and Policy, Social Work, Sociology, and Youth Development to share their expertise and contribute to our mission of promoting adolescent health. Moreover, we value the voices of young individuals, family and community members, and healthcare professionals, and encourage them to submit poetry, personal narratives, images, and other creative works that provide unique insights into the experiences of adolescents and young adults. By combining scientific peer-reviewed research with creative expressions, our Journal aims to create a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in adolescent and young adult health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信