中国东海外陆架 TBF-1 号岩心的 OSL 和放射性碳年代测定及其对第四纪晚期地层相关性的影响

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zhongbo Wang , Nan Tang , Penghui Lin , Pengyu Qiao , Kai Lu , Xi Mei , Jun Sun , Jianghao Qi , Yang Wang , Hongxian Chu , Zhongping Lai
{"title":"中国东海外陆架 TBF-1 号岩心的 OSL 和放射性碳年代测定及其对第四纪晚期地层相关性的影响","authors":"Zhongbo Wang ,&nbsp;Nan Tang ,&nbsp;Penghui Lin ,&nbsp;Pengyu Qiao ,&nbsp;Kai Lu ,&nbsp;Xi Mei ,&nbsp;Jun Sun ,&nbsp;Jianghao Qi ,&nbsp;Yang Wang ,&nbsp;Hongxian Chu ,&nbsp;Zhongping Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.quageo.2024.101614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is crucial to establish a robust chronology for understanding late Quaternary sedimentation processes and environment changes in response to sea-level fluctuation on shelves. The shelf of the East China Sea (ECS) is featured by huge terrigenous sediment input and striking land -sea interaction during the late Quaternary. However, there remains controversy in chronostratigraphic rebuilding of transgression and regression deposits during eustatic-glacial cycles, mainly due to a lack of reliable dating data. In this study, an extensive comparison of 17 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and 15 AMS <sup>14</sup>C ages from core TBF-1 (upper 40 m) provides a constraint in chronostratigraphic reconstruction since Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 5. OSL ages range from 9.5 ± 0.7 to 67.3 ± 4.8 ka at depths from 2.00 to 28.00 m, while <sup>14</sup>C ages range from 6645 to 41435 cal a BP at depths from 0.02 to 17.52 m. Regression analysis demonstrates a high level of agreement between OSL and <sup>14</sup>C ages, with r<sup>2</sup> values of 0.91 and 0.90, respectively. For Holocene sediments (U1), both OSL and <sup>14</sup>C methods are applicable in tidal sand ridges, however, it should be noted that <sup>14</sup>C ages may exhibit a young bias of up to 3 ka. For pre-Holocene sediments (U6-U2), OSL ages are robust within saturation limitation of OSL signal (D<sub>e</sub> up to ca. 166 Gy), cross-checked by feldspar post-IR IRSL (pIRIR) dating protocol. Nevertheless, the shell <sup>14</sup>C ages (11620 and 10390 cal a BP at depths of 13.95–14.56 m) in Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) fluvial sediments of U2 are significantly underestimated, because of their susceptibility to recrystallization and overgrowth, resulting in carbon exchange with environment. While the peaty layer's<sup>14</sup>C age in deltaic deposition (17.50 m, U5) was determined to be 36420 cal a BP, coincided with OSL age of 39.6 ± 3.9 ka. The chronostratigraphy since MIS 5 for core TBF-1 exhibits a significant correlation with previously published cores SFK-1, DZQ4, and DH02, on the ECS outer shelf. Through the evaluation of those underestimated <sup>14</sup>C ages and saturated OSL ages, we re-elucidated the primary sedimentary facies and their respective formation periods. This sedimentary stratigraphic illustration exhibits significant consistency with eustatic-glacial cycles. The renewed chronological framework for ECS shelf allows better correlation between the late Quaternary sedimentary evolution and the land-sea interaction on open shelves dominated by siliciclastic sedimentation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OSL and radiocarbon dating of core TBF-1 on the outer shelf of the East China Sea and implications for late Quaternary stratigraphic correlation\",\"authors\":\"Zhongbo Wang ,&nbsp;Nan Tang ,&nbsp;Penghui Lin ,&nbsp;Pengyu Qiao ,&nbsp;Kai Lu ,&nbsp;Xi Mei ,&nbsp;Jun Sun ,&nbsp;Jianghao Qi ,&nbsp;Yang Wang ,&nbsp;Hongxian Chu ,&nbsp;Zhongping Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.quageo.2024.101614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It is crucial to establish a robust chronology for understanding late Quaternary sedimentation processes and environment changes in response to sea-level fluctuation on shelves. The shelf of the East China Sea (ECS) is featured by huge terrigenous sediment input and striking land -sea interaction during the late Quaternary. However, there remains controversy in chronostratigraphic rebuilding of transgression and regression deposits during eustatic-glacial cycles, mainly due to a lack of reliable dating data. In this study, an extensive comparison of 17 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and 15 AMS <sup>14</sup>C ages from core TBF-1 (upper 40 m) provides a constraint in chronostratigraphic reconstruction since Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 5. OSL ages range from 9.5 ± 0.7 to 67.3 ± 4.8 ka at depths from 2.00 to 28.00 m, while <sup>14</sup>C ages range from 6645 to 41435 cal a BP at depths from 0.02 to 17.52 m. Regression analysis demonstrates a high level of agreement between OSL and <sup>14</sup>C ages, with r<sup>2</sup> values of 0.91 and 0.90, respectively. For Holocene sediments (U1), both OSL and <sup>14</sup>C methods are applicable in tidal sand ridges, however, it should be noted that <sup>14</sup>C ages may exhibit a young bias of up to 3 ka. For pre-Holocene sediments (U6-U2), OSL ages are robust within saturation limitation of OSL signal (D<sub>e</sub> up to ca. 166 Gy), cross-checked by feldspar post-IR IRSL (pIRIR) dating protocol. Nevertheless, the shell <sup>14</sup>C ages (11620 and 10390 cal a BP at depths of 13.95–14.56 m) in Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) fluvial sediments of U2 are significantly underestimated, because of their susceptibility to recrystallization and overgrowth, resulting in carbon exchange with environment. While the peaty layer's<sup>14</sup>C age in deltaic deposition (17.50 m, U5) was determined to be 36420 cal a BP, coincided with OSL age of 39.6 ± 3.9 ka. The chronostratigraphy since MIS 5 for core TBF-1 exhibits a significant correlation with previously published cores SFK-1, DZQ4, and DH02, on the ECS outer shelf. Through the evaluation of those underestimated <sup>14</sup>C ages and saturated OSL ages, we re-elucidated the primary sedimentary facies and their respective formation periods. This sedimentary stratigraphic illustration exhibits significant consistency with eustatic-glacial cycles. The renewed chronological framework for ECS shelf allows better correlation between the late Quaternary sedimentary evolution and the land-sea interaction on open shelves dominated by siliciclastic sedimentation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871101424001183\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871101424001183","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解第四纪晚期沉积过程和陆架海平面波动引起的环境变化,建立可靠的年代学至关重要。中国东海陆架在第四纪晚期具有巨大的陆相沉积输入和显著的海陆相互作用特征。然而,由于缺乏可靠的测年数据,在对震旦纪-冰川期的横断沉积和回归沉积进行年代地层重建方面仍存在争议。本研究对 TBF-1(上部 40 米)岩心的 17 个光激发发光(OSL)年龄和 15 个 AMS 14C 年龄进行了广泛比较,为海洋同位素阶段(MIS)5 以来的年代地层重建提供了约束。回归分析表明,OSL 和 14C 年龄具有很高的一致性,r2 值分别为 0.91 和 0.90。对于全新世沉积物(U1),OSL 和 14C 方法都适用于潮汐沙脊,但需要注意的是,14C 年龄可能会出现长达 3 ka 的年轻偏差。对于全新世以前的沉积物(U6-U2),OSL 年龄在 OSL 信号饱和极限(De 高达约 166 Gy)范围内是可靠的,长石后红外 IRSL(pIR)测年规程对其进行了交叉检验。尽管如此,U2 的末次冰期(LGM)河流沉积物中贝壳的 14C 年龄(公元前 11620 年和公元前 10390 年,深度为 13.95-14.56 米)被严重低估,因为它们容易再结晶和过度生长,导致与环境进行碳交换。而三角洲沉积中泥炭层(17.50 米,U5)的 14C 年龄被测定为 36420 a BP,与 OSL 年龄 39.6 ± 3.9 ka 相吻合。TBF-1岩芯自MIS 5以来的年代地层与之前发表的位于ECS外大陆架的SFK-1、DZQ4和DH02岩芯具有显著的相关性。通过评估这些被低估的 14C 年龄和饱和 OSL 年龄,我们重新阐明了主要沉积层面及其各自的形成时期。这一沉积地层图示与震旦纪-冰川周期具有显著的一致性。更新的 ECS 陆架年代学框架使第四纪晚期沉积演化与硅质沉积为主的开放陆架上的海陆相互作用之间有了更好的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OSL and radiocarbon dating of core TBF-1 on the outer shelf of the East China Sea and implications for late Quaternary stratigraphic correlation

It is crucial to establish a robust chronology for understanding late Quaternary sedimentation processes and environment changes in response to sea-level fluctuation on shelves. The shelf of the East China Sea (ECS) is featured by huge terrigenous sediment input and striking land -sea interaction during the late Quaternary. However, there remains controversy in chronostratigraphic rebuilding of transgression and regression deposits during eustatic-glacial cycles, mainly due to a lack of reliable dating data. In this study, an extensive comparison of 17 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and 15 AMS 14C ages from core TBF-1 (upper 40 m) provides a constraint in chronostratigraphic reconstruction since Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 5. OSL ages range from 9.5 ± 0.7 to 67.3 ± 4.8 ka at depths from 2.00 to 28.00 m, while 14C ages range from 6645 to 41435 cal a BP at depths from 0.02 to 17.52 m. Regression analysis demonstrates a high level of agreement between OSL and 14C ages, with r2 values of 0.91 and 0.90, respectively. For Holocene sediments (U1), both OSL and 14C methods are applicable in tidal sand ridges, however, it should be noted that 14C ages may exhibit a young bias of up to 3 ka. For pre-Holocene sediments (U6-U2), OSL ages are robust within saturation limitation of OSL signal (De up to ca. 166 Gy), cross-checked by feldspar post-IR IRSL (pIRIR) dating protocol. Nevertheless, the shell 14C ages (11620 and 10390 cal a BP at depths of 13.95–14.56 m) in Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) fluvial sediments of U2 are significantly underestimated, because of their susceptibility to recrystallization and overgrowth, resulting in carbon exchange with environment. While the peaty layer's14C age in deltaic deposition (17.50 m, U5) was determined to be 36420 cal a BP, coincided with OSL age of 39.6 ± 3.9 ka. The chronostratigraphy since MIS 5 for core TBF-1 exhibits a significant correlation with previously published cores SFK-1, DZQ4, and DH02, on the ECS outer shelf. Through the evaluation of those underestimated 14C ages and saturated OSL ages, we re-elucidated the primary sedimentary facies and their respective formation periods. This sedimentary stratigraphic illustration exhibits significant consistency with eustatic-glacial cycles. The renewed chronological framework for ECS shelf allows better correlation between the late Quaternary sedimentary evolution and the land-sea interaction on open shelves dominated by siliciclastic sedimentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信