药物涂层球囊血管成形术后股浅动脉交叉处的平均压力梯度和分流量储备。

Vascular and endovascular surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1177/15385744241275055
Taira Kobayashi, Takashi Fujiwara, Masaki Hamamoto, Takanobu Okazaki, Ryo Okusako, Tomokazu Yamaguchi, Naohide Sugawara, Mayu Tomota, Shinya Takahashi
{"title":"药物涂层球囊血管成形术后股浅动脉交叉处的平均压力梯度和分流量储备。","authors":"Taira Kobayashi, Takashi Fujiwara, Masaki Hamamoto, Takanobu Okazaki, Ryo Okusako, Tomokazu Yamaguchi, Naohide Sugawara, Mayu Tomota, Shinya Takahashi","doi":"10.1177/15385744241275055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Residual dissection is a concern in endovascular treatment with a DCB, and there is limited knowledge of hemodynamics at a dissection lesion. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the mean pressure gradient (MPG) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) at a residual dissection after DCB angioplasty for the superficial femoral artery (SFA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 59 cases with residual SFA dissection treated with DCB angioplasty at a single center were analyzed retrospectively. The dissection was classified into 6 types (A-F). The primary endpoints were MPG and FFR at a residual dissection lesion after DCB angioplasty, using evaluation with a pressure wire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median lesion length was 70 (40-130) mm with 24% popliteal involvement, and 11 cases (18%) had chronic total occlusion. A completion angiogram revealed dissection of types A (n = 33, 56%), B (n = 18, 31%), C (n = 7, 12%), and D (n = 1, 2%). The median MPGs in type A, B, and C cases were 0 (0-2), 0 (0-4), and 3 (0-6) mmHg, with a significant lower in type C cases than in type A cases (A vs C, <i>P</i> = .021). The median FFRs in type A, B, and C cases of 1.0 (.98-1.00), 1.0 (.96-1.00), and .98 (.95-1.00) did not differ significantly among dissection types (A vs B, <i>P</i> = .86; A vs C, <i>P</i> = .055; B vs C, <i>P</i> = .15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first report of hemodynamics at a SFA dissection. The results suggest that low-grade dissection (types A or B) does not affect MPG and FFR at a SFA lesion. This indicates that a bailout stent may be unnecessary for patients with dissection of types A or B. A further investigation is needed to determine whether a scaffold is required for a SFA lesion with type C dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mean Pressure Gradient and Fractional Flow Reserve at A Superficial Femoral Artery Dissection after Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Taira Kobayashi, Takashi Fujiwara, Masaki Hamamoto, Takanobu Okazaki, Ryo Okusako, Tomokazu Yamaguchi, Naohide Sugawara, Mayu Tomota, Shinya Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15385744241275055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Residual dissection is a concern in endovascular treatment with a DCB, and there is limited knowledge of hemodynamics at a dissection lesion. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the mean pressure gradient (MPG) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) at a residual dissection after DCB angioplasty for the superficial femoral artery (SFA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 59 cases with residual SFA dissection treated with DCB angioplasty at a single center were analyzed retrospectively. The dissection was classified into 6 types (A-F). The primary endpoints were MPG and FFR at a residual dissection lesion after DCB angioplasty, using evaluation with a pressure wire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median lesion length was 70 (40-130) mm with 24% popliteal involvement, and 11 cases (18%) had chronic total occlusion. A completion angiogram revealed dissection of types A (n = 33, 56%), B (n = 18, 31%), C (n = 7, 12%), and D (n = 1, 2%). The median MPGs in type A, B, and C cases were 0 (0-2), 0 (0-4), and 3 (0-6) mmHg, with a significant lower in type C cases than in type A cases (A vs C, <i>P</i> = .021). The median FFRs in type A, B, and C cases of 1.0 (.98-1.00), 1.0 (.96-1.00), and .98 (.95-1.00) did not differ significantly among dissection types (A vs B, <i>P</i> = .86; A vs C, <i>P</i> = .055; B vs C, <i>P</i> = .15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first report of hemodynamics at a SFA dissection. The results suggest that low-grade dissection (types A or B) does not affect MPG and FFR at a SFA lesion. This indicates that a bailout stent may be unnecessary for patients with dissection of types A or B. A further investigation is needed to determine whether a scaffold is required for a SFA lesion with type C dissection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular and endovascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular and endovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241275055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241275055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用 DCB 进行血管内治疗时,残余夹层是一个令人担忧的问题,而人们对夹层病变处的血液动力学了解有限。因此,本研究旨在评估股浅动脉(SFA)DCB血管成形术后残余夹层处的平均压力梯度(MPG)和分数血流储备(FFR):回顾性分析了在一个中心接受DCB血管成形术治疗的59例股浅动脉夹层残留病例。夹层分为 6 种类型(A-F)。主要终点是DCB血管成形术后残余夹层病变处的MPG和FFR,使用压线进行评估:中位病变长度为 70(40-130)毫米,24% 的病变累及腘窝,11 例(18%)为慢性全闭塞。完成血管造影显示,夹层类型为 A 型(33 例,56%)、B 型(18 例,31%)、C 型(7 例,12%)和 D 型(1 例,2%)。A、B和C型病例的中位MPG分别为0(0-2)、0(0-4)和3(0-6)mmHg,C型病例明显低于A型病例(A vs C,P = .021)。A、B和C型病例的中位FFR分别为1.0(.98-1.00)、1.0(.96-1.00)和.98(.95-1.00),不同夹层类型的FFR没有显著差异(A vs B,P = .86;A vs C,P = .055;B vs C,P = .15):结论:这是第一份关于SFA夹层血液动力学的报告。结果表明,低级别夹层(A 型或 B 型)不会影响 SFA 病变处的 MPG 和 FFR。这表明 A 型或 B 型夹层患者可能不需要救助支架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mean Pressure Gradient and Fractional Flow Reserve at A Superficial Femoral Artery Dissection after Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty.

Objectives: Residual dissection is a concern in endovascular treatment with a DCB, and there is limited knowledge of hemodynamics at a dissection lesion. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the mean pressure gradient (MPG) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) at a residual dissection after DCB angioplasty for the superficial femoral artery (SFA).

Methods: A total of 59 cases with residual SFA dissection treated with DCB angioplasty at a single center were analyzed retrospectively. The dissection was classified into 6 types (A-F). The primary endpoints were MPG and FFR at a residual dissection lesion after DCB angioplasty, using evaluation with a pressure wire.

Results: The median lesion length was 70 (40-130) mm with 24% popliteal involvement, and 11 cases (18%) had chronic total occlusion. A completion angiogram revealed dissection of types A (n = 33, 56%), B (n = 18, 31%), C (n = 7, 12%), and D (n = 1, 2%). The median MPGs in type A, B, and C cases were 0 (0-2), 0 (0-4), and 3 (0-6) mmHg, with a significant lower in type C cases than in type A cases (A vs C, P = .021). The median FFRs in type A, B, and C cases of 1.0 (.98-1.00), 1.0 (.96-1.00), and .98 (.95-1.00) did not differ significantly among dissection types (A vs B, P = .86; A vs C, P = .055; B vs C, P = .15).

Conclusions: This is the first report of hemodynamics at a SFA dissection. The results suggest that low-grade dissection (types A or B) does not affect MPG and FFR at a SFA lesion. This indicates that a bailout stent may be unnecessary for patients with dissection of types A or B. A further investigation is needed to determine whether a scaffold is required for a SFA lesion with type C dissection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信