在小梁切除术中使用可拆卸的调节缝合线,可更安全、更有效地控制眼压。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Alfonso Savastano, Emanuele Maiola, Matteo Mario Carlà, Gloria Gambini, Francesco Boselli, Federico Giannuzzi, Clara Rizzo, Stanislao Rizzo
{"title":"在小梁切除术中使用可拆卸的调节缝合线,可更安全、更有效地控制眼压。","authors":"Alfonso Savastano, Emanuele Maiola, Matteo Mario Carlà, Gloria Gambini, Francesco Boselli, Federico Giannuzzi, Clara Rizzo, Stanislao Rizzo","doi":"10.1177/11206721241276573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Comparing the effect of standard trabeculectomy with direct sutures versus trabeculectomy with compression and everting sutures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mono-centric randomized prospective comparative study on 38 glaucomatous eyes undergoing trabeculectomy: 19 with standard fixed sutures (group A) and 19 withremovable regulating sutures (group B). Preoperatively and at day-7, 1-month, 2-months, 3-months and 6-months after surgery, we recorded best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and possible complications. Complete, partial success and failure rates were recorded at the end of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group B, we pulled everting sutures with the \"horse bridle\" technique at the 14<sup>th</sup> day, and successively removed all sutures between the 14<sup>th</sup>-30<sup>th</sup> post-operative day. At month-1, we recorded a significant IOP reduction in both groups (mean reduction of 11.5 mmHg for group A and of 14.4 mmHg for Group B, p = 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, group B showed a significantly lower IOP than group A (-4.2 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.0 to -0.5 mmHg for group B, p = 0.01). At 2, 3 and 6-months, no significant IOP differences were reported between the two groups (all p > 0.05), but failure rate was higher for group A (21%) than for group B (11%). No differences in visual outcomes at any timepoints were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trabeculectomy with removable regulating sutures showed a good safety profile, comparable to standard trabeculectomy. Moreover, we reported a lower IOP one month postoperatively, suggesting this technique may optimize early management of trabeculectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removable regulating sutures during trabeculectomy for a safer and more effective intraocular pressure control.\",\"authors\":\"Alfonso Savastano, Emanuele Maiola, Matteo Mario Carlà, Gloria Gambini, Francesco Boselli, Federico Giannuzzi, Clara Rizzo, Stanislao Rizzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11206721241276573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Comparing the effect of standard trabeculectomy with direct sutures versus trabeculectomy with compression and everting sutures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mono-centric randomized prospective comparative study on 38 glaucomatous eyes undergoing trabeculectomy: 19 with standard fixed sutures (group A) and 19 withremovable regulating sutures (group B). Preoperatively and at day-7, 1-month, 2-months, 3-months and 6-months after surgery, we recorded best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and possible complications. Complete, partial success and failure rates were recorded at the end of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group B, we pulled everting sutures with the \\\"horse bridle\\\" technique at the 14<sup>th</sup> day, and successively removed all sutures between the 14<sup>th</sup>-30<sup>th</sup> post-operative day. At month-1, we recorded a significant IOP reduction in both groups (mean reduction of 11.5 mmHg for group A and of 14.4 mmHg for Group B, p = 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, group B showed a significantly lower IOP than group A (-4.2 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.0 to -0.5 mmHg for group B, p = 0.01). At 2, 3 and 6-months, no significant IOP differences were reported between the two groups (all p > 0.05), but failure rate was higher for group A (21%) than for group B (11%). No differences in visual outcomes at any timepoints were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trabeculectomy with removable regulating sutures showed a good safety profile, comparable to standard trabeculectomy. Moreover, we reported a lower IOP one month postoperatively, suggesting this technique may optimize early management of trabeculectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241276573\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241276573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较直接缝合的标准小梁切除术与加压和外翻缝合的小梁切除术的效果:对 38 只接受小梁切除术的青光眼眼球进行单中心随机前瞻性比较研究:19 只使用标准固定缝线(A 组),19 只使用可拆卸调节缝线(B 组)。术前、术后第 7 天、1 个月、2 个月、3 个月和 6 个月,我们记录了最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼压(IOP)和可能出现的并发症。研究结束时记录了完全成功率、部分成功率和失败率:在 B 组中,我们在术后第 14 天用 "马缰绳 "技术拉开常开缝线,并在术后第 14-30 天之间陆续拆除所有缝线。第 1 个月时,两组患者的眼压均显著降低(A 组平均降低 11.5 mmHg,B 组平均降低 14.4 mmHg,P = 0.001,P 0.05),但 A 组的失败率(21%)高于 B 组(11%)。任何时间点的视力结果均无差异:结论:使用可拆卸调节缝线的小梁切除术安全性良好,与标准小梁切除术相当。此外,我们发现术后一个月的眼压较低,这表明该技术可优化小梁切除术的早期管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Removable regulating sutures during trabeculectomy for a safer and more effective intraocular pressure control.

Purpose: Comparing the effect of standard trabeculectomy with direct sutures versus trabeculectomy with compression and everting sutures.

Methods: Mono-centric randomized prospective comparative study on 38 glaucomatous eyes undergoing trabeculectomy: 19 with standard fixed sutures (group A) and 19 withremovable regulating sutures (group B). Preoperatively and at day-7, 1-month, 2-months, 3-months and 6-months after surgery, we recorded best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and possible complications. Complete, partial success and failure rates were recorded at the end of the study.

Results: In group B, we pulled everting sutures with the "horse bridle" technique at the 14th day, and successively removed all sutures between the 14th-30th post-operative day. At month-1, we recorded a significant IOP reduction in both groups (mean reduction of 11.5 mmHg for group A and of 14.4 mmHg for Group B, p = 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, group B showed a significantly lower IOP than group A (-4.2 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.0 to -0.5 mmHg for group B, p = 0.01). At 2, 3 and 6-months, no significant IOP differences were reported between the two groups (all p > 0.05), but failure rate was higher for group A (21%) than for group B (11%). No differences in visual outcomes at any timepoints were noted.

Conclusions: Trabeculectomy with removable regulating sutures showed a good safety profile, comparable to standard trabeculectomy. Moreover, we reported a lower IOP one month postoperatively, suggesting this technique may optimize early management of trabeculectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信