基于化学指纹的大麻品种分类--对德国市场上化学品种的广泛分析。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
N Herwig, S Utgenannt, F Nickl, P Möbius, L Nowak, O Schulz, M Fischer
{"title":"基于化学指纹的大麻品种分类--对德国市场上化学品种的广泛分析。","authors":"N Herwig, S Utgenannt, F Nickl, P Möbius, L Nowak, O Schulz, M Fischer","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Cannabis cultivars were usually categorized based on their genetic profile as sativa, indica, or hybrid types. However, these three criteria do not allow sufficient differentiation between the numerous varieties of cannabis strains. Furthermore, this classification is based on morphological and bio-geographical properties of the plants and does not represent the chemical composition of different cultivars. The concentration of cannabinoids and terpenes are crucial for the pharmacological effect, not only because of the known entourage effect, and therefore needs to be considered by categorization. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 140 medicinal cannabis flowers available on the German market were analyzed regarding their individual terpene profile using GC-MS analysis. Statistical evaluation was performed to investigate correlations and data relations as well as for clustering. <b>Results:</b> Multivariate analysis showed correlations between individual terpenes. However, there was no statistical correlation between terpene profiles and their respective genetic profile. Terpene profiles of sativa, indica, and hybrid strains are quite heterogenous and clearly showed that there is no relation between terpenes and the estimated pharmacological effect. As a result, we suggest a new classification system based on individual terpene profiles to faster a comprehensive understanding of the expected medical effect. <b>Discussion:</b> Considering main terpenes, we established a concept of six clusters with various terpene profiles being attributed to different medicinal applications. We excluded tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) content from clustering as most of the strains were THC dominant and therefore distort the results. Our pattern of strains with similar terpene profiles might refine the existing classes of chemotypes with different THC:CBD content. <b>Conclusion:</b> The categorization of cannabis strains based on their terpene profiles allows a clearer, finer and, above all, more meaningful classification than the existing sativa/indica classification. Due to the entourage effect and the interactions between cannabinoids and terpenes, this group of substances is also given the necessary consideration when selecting the right medicine for the individual. Within the next steps, further studies are needed with the aim of mapping clinical validated effects to our chemovars. If it is possible to correlate therapy of symptoms to specific chemical profiles personalized cannabinoid therapy will be possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of Cannabis Strains Based on their Chemical Fingerprint-A Broad Analysis of Chemovars in the German Market.\",\"authors\":\"N Herwig, S Utgenannt, F Nickl, P Möbius, L Nowak, O Schulz, M Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/can.2024.0127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Cannabis cultivars were usually categorized based on their genetic profile as sativa, indica, or hybrid types. However, these three criteria do not allow sufficient differentiation between the numerous varieties of cannabis strains. Furthermore, this classification is based on morphological and bio-geographical properties of the plants and does not represent the chemical composition of different cultivars. The concentration of cannabinoids and terpenes are crucial for the pharmacological effect, not only because of the known entourage effect, and therefore needs to be considered by categorization. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 140 medicinal cannabis flowers available on the German market were analyzed regarding their individual terpene profile using GC-MS analysis. Statistical evaluation was performed to investigate correlations and data relations as well as for clustering. <b>Results:</b> Multivariate analysis showed correlations between individual terpenes. However, there was no statistical correlation between terpene profiles and their respective genetic profile. Terpene profiles of sativa, indica, and hybrid strains are quite heterogenous and clearly showed that there is no relation between terpenes and the estimated pharmacological effect. As a result, we suggest a new classification system based on individual terpene profiles to faster a comprehensive understanding of the expected medical effect. <b>Discussion:</b> Considering main terpenes, we established a concept of six clusters with various terpene profiles being attributed to different medicinal applications. We excluded tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) content from clustering as most of the strains were THC dominant and therefore distort the results. Our pattern of strains with similar terpene profiles might refine the existing classes of chemotypes with different THC:CBD content. <b>Conclusion:</b> The categorization of cannabis strains based on their terpene profiles allows a clearer, finer and, above all, more meaningful classification than the existing sativa/indica classification. Due to the entourage effect and the interactions between cannabinoids and terpenes, this group of substances is also given the necessary consideration when selecting the right medicine for the individual. Within the next steps, further studies are needed with the aim of mapping clinical validated effects to our chemovars. If it is possible to correlate therapy of symptoms to specific chemical profiles personalized cannabinoid therapy will be possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0127\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:大麻栽培品种通常根据其基因特征分为茄科、籼科或杂交类型。然而,这三个标准不足以区分众多的大麻品种。此外,这种分类是基于植物的形态和生物地理特性,并不代表不同栽培品种的化学成分。大麻素和萜类化合物的浓度对药理作用至关重要,这不仅是因为已知的协同效应,因此需要在分类时加以考虑。材料和方法:使用气相色谱-质谱分析法对德国市场上销售的 140 种药用大麻花的萜烯成分进行了分析。对相关性和数据关系以及聚类进行了统计评估。结果显示多变量分析表明单个萜烯之间存在相关性。不过,萜烯特征与各自的基因特征之间没有统计相关性。荠属、籼属和杂交品种的萜烯含量差异很大,清楚地表明萜烯与估计的药理作用之间没有关系。因此,我们建议根据单个萜烯特征建立一个新的分类系统,以更快地全面了解预期的医疗效果。讨论:考虑到主要萜烯,我们建立了六大类萜烯的概念,不同的萜烯具有不同的药用价值。我们将四氢大麻酚(THC)和大麻二酚(CBD)含量排除在聚类之外,因为大多数菌株都以 THC 为主,因此会扭曲结果。我们对具有相似萜烯特征的菌株进行的模式分析可能会完善现有的四氢大麻酚:大麻二酚含量不同的化学类型类别。结论:根据萜烯特征对大麻品系进行分类,比现有的茄属/籼属分类更清晰、更精细,尤其是更有意义。由于大麻素和萜烯之间的协同效应和相互作用,在选择适合个人的药物时,这组物质也会得到必要的考虑。在接下来的步骤中,还需要进一步研究,以便将临床验证的效果映射到我们的化学品种上。如果能够将症状治疗与特定的化学成分相关联,那么个性化的大麻素治疗将成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classification of Cannabis Strains Based on their Chemical Fingerprint-A Broad Analysis of Chemovars in the German Market.

Introduction: Cannabis cultivars were usually categorized based on their genetic profile as sativa, indica, or hybrid types. However, these three criteria do not allow sufficient differentiation between the numerous varieties of cannabis strains. Furthermore, this classification is based on morphological and bio-geographical properties of the plants and does not represent the chemical composition of different cultivars. The concentration of cannabinoids and terpenes are crucial for the pharmacological effect, not only because of the known entourage effect, and therefore needs to be considered by categorization. Materials and Methods: A total of 140 medicinal cannabis flowers available on the German market were analyzed regarding their individual terpene profile using GC-MS analysis. Statistical evaluation was performed to investigate correlations and data relations as well as for clustering. Results: Multivariate analysis showed correlations between individual terpenes. However, there was no statistical correlation between terpene profiles and their respective genetic profile. Terpene profiles of sativa, indica, and hybrid strains are quite heterogenous and clearly showed that there is no relation between terpenes and the estimated pharmacological effect. As a result, we suggest a new classification system based on individual terpene profiles to faster a comprehensive understanding of the expected medical effect. Discussion: Considering main terpenes, we established a concept of six clusters with various terpene profiles being attributed to different medicinal applications. We excluded tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) content from clustering as most of the strains were THC dominant and therefore distort the results. Our pattern of strains with similar terpene profiles might refine the existing classes of chemotypes with different THC:CBD content. Conclusion: The categorization of cannabis strains based on their terpene profiles allows a clearer, finer and, above all, more meaningful classification than the existing sativa/indica classification. Due to the entourage effect and the interactions between cannabinoids and terpenes, this group of substances is also given the necessary consideration when selecting the right medicine for the individual. Within the next steps, further studies are needed with the aim of mapping clinical validated effects to our chemovars. If it is possible to correlate therapy of symptoms to specific chemical profiles personalized cannabinoid therapy will be possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信