我们对海底压力的季节周期了解多少?

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
R. M. Ponte, M. Zhao, M. Schindelegger
{"title":"我们对海底压力的季节周期了解多少?","authors":"R. M. Ponte,&nbsp;M. Zhao,&nbsp;M. Schindelegger","doi":"10.1029/2024EA003661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We revisit the nature of the ocean bottom pressure (<i>p</i><sub><i>b</i></sub>) seasonal cycle by leveraging the mounting GRACE-based <i>p</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> record and its assimilation in the ocean state estimates produced by the project for Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO). We focus on the mean seasonal cycle from both data and ECCO estimates, examining their similarities and differences and exploring the underlying causes. Despite substantial year-to-year variability, the 21-year period studied (2002–2022) provides a relatively robust estimate of the mean seasonal cycle. Results indicate that the <i>p</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> annual harmonic tends to dominate but the semi-annual harmonic can also be important (e.g., subpolar North Pacific, Bellingshausen Basin). Amplitudes and short-scale phase variability are enhanced near coasts and continental shelves, emphasizing the importance of bottom topography in shaping the seasonal cycle in <i>p</i><sub><i>b</i></sub>. Comparisons of GRACE and ECCO estimates indicate good qualitative agreement, but considerable quantitative differences remain in many areas. The GRACE amplitudes tend to be higher than those of ECCO typically by 10%–50%, and by more than 50% in extensive regions, particularly around continental boundaries. Phase differences of more than 1 (0.5) months for the annual (semiannual) harmonics are also apparent. Larger differences near coastal regions can be related to enhanced GRACE data uncertainties and also to the absence of gravitational attraction and loading effects in ECCO. Improvements in both data and model-based estimates are still needed to narrow present uncertainties in <i>p</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":54286,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Space Science","volume":"11 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EA003661","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Well Do We Know the Seasonal Cycle in Ocean Bottom Pressure?\",\"authors\":\"R. M. Ponte,&nbsp;M. Zhao,&nbsp;M. Schindelegger\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024EA003661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We revisit the nature of the ocean bottom pressure (<i>p</i><sub><i>b</i></sub>) seasonal cycle by leveraging the mounting GRACE-based <i>p</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> record and its assimilation in the ocean state estimates produced by the project for Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO). We focus on the mean seasonal cycle from both data and ECCO estimates, examining their similarities and differences and exploring the underlying causes. Despite substantial year-to-year variability, the 21-year period studied (2002–2022) provides a relatively robust estimate of the mean seasonal cycle. Results indicate that the <i>p</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> annual harmonic tends to dominate but the semi-annual harmonic can also be important (e.g., subpolar North Pacific, Bellingshausen Basin). Amplitudes and short-scale phase variability are enhanced near coasts and continental shelves, emphasizing the importance of bottom topography in shaping the seasonal cycle in <i>p</i><sub><i>b</i></sub>. Comparisons of GRACE and ECCO estimates indicate good qualitative agreement, but considerable quantitative differences remain in many areas. The GRACE amplitudes tend to be higher than those of ECCO typically by 10%–50%, and by more than 50% in extensive regions, particularly around continental boundaries. Phase differences of more than 1 (0.5) months for the annual (semiannual) harmonics are also apparent. Larger differences near coastal regions can be related to enhanced GRACE data uncertainties and also to the absence of gravitational attraction and loading effects in ECCO. Improvements in both data and model-based estimates are still needed to narrow present uncertainties in <i>p</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> estimates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth and Space Science\",\"volume\":\"11 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EA003661\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth and Space Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EA003661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EA003661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用基于全球大气环流探测卫星(GRACE)的不断增加的底压记录及其在海洋环流和气候估算项目(ECCO)产生的海洋状态估算中的同化作用,重新审视了海洋底压(pb)季节周期的性质。我们将重点放在数据和 ECCO 估算值的平均季节周期上,研究它们的异同并探索其根本原因。尽管年际变化很大,但所研究的 21 年期间(2002-2022 年)提供了相对可靠的平均季节周期估计值。结果表明,pb 年谐波往往占主导地位,但半年谐波也可能很重要(如北太平洋副极地、贝林绍森盆地)。振幅和短尺度相位变化在海岸和大陆架附近增强,强调了海底地形在形成 pb 季节周期中的重要性。对 GRACE 和 ECCO 估计值的比较表明,两者在质量上有很好的一致性,但在许多方面仍存在相当大的数量差异。GRACE 的振幅通常比 ECCO 的振幅高 10%-50%,在大面积区域,尤其是大陆边界附近,GRACE 的振幅比 ECCO 的振幅高 50%以上。年(半年)谐波的相位差也很明显,超过 1(0.5)个月。沿海地区附近较大的差异可能与 GRACE 数据不确定性增强有关,也与 ECCO 中没有引力吸引和负载效应有关。仍需改进数据和基于模式的估计,以缩小目前 pb 估计的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How Well Do We Know the Seasonal Cycle in Ocean Bottom Pressure?

How Well Do We Know the Seasonal Cycle in Ocean Bottom Pressure?

We revisit the nature of the ocean bottom pressure (pb) seasonal cycle by leveraging the mounting GRACE-based pb record and its assimilation in the ocean state estimates produced by the project for Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO). We focus on the mean seasonal cycle from both data and ECCO estimates, examining their similarities and differences and exploring the underlying causes. Despite substantial year-to-year variability, the 21-year period studied (2002–2022) provides a relatively robust estimate of the mean seasonal cycle. Results indicate that the pb annual harmonic tends to dominate but the semi-annual harmonic can also be important (e.g., subpolar North Pacific, Bellingshausen Basin). Amplitudes and short-scale phase variability are enhanced near coasts and continental shelves, emphasizing the importance of bottom topography in shaping the seasonal cycle in pb. Comparisons of GRACE and ECCO estimates indicate good qualitative agreement, but considerable quantitative differences remain in many areas. The GRACE amplitudes tend to be higher than those of ECCO typically by 10%–50%, and by more than 50% in extensive regions, particularly around continental boundaries. Phase differences of more than 1 (0.5) months for the annual (semiannual) harmonics are also apparent. Larger differences near coastal regions can be related to enhanced GRACE data uncertainties and also to the absence of gravitational attraction and loading effects in ECCO. Improvements in both data and model-based estimates are still needed to narrow present uncertainties in pb estimates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth and Space Science
Earth and Space Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Marking AGU’s second new open access journal in the last 12 months, Earth and Space Science is the only journal that reflects the expansive range of science represented by AGU’s 62,000 members, including all of the Earth, planetary, and space sciences, and related fields in environmental science, geoengineering, space engineering, and biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信