社会可持续性行动:建筑项目管理实践的探索性研究

Hamdi Bashir , Rana Musa , Hassan Ahmed Al Zarooni , Udechukwu Ojiako , Salah Haridy , Mohammad Shamsuzzaman
{"title":"社会可持续性行动:建筑项目管理实践的探索性研究","authors":"Hamdi Bashir ,&nbsp;Rana Musa ,&nbsp;Hassan Ahmed Al Zarooni ,&nbsp;Udechukwu Ojiako ,&nbsp;Salah Haridy ,&nbsp;Mohammad Shamsuzzaman","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The significance of recognizing social sustainability practices for the successful management of projects is increasingly acknowledged. However, to what extent these practices are actually implemented within project management has not been sufficiently addressed in the literature. To address this gap, an empirical study was conducted to investigate the usage of social sustainability practices and explore any disparities in their implementation between domestic and international construction firms in the United Arab Emirates. This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining interviews and a structured questionnaire. Through the interviews, 32 social sustainability practices were identified. Subsequently, a questionnaire was used to collect data from project managers representing 259 firms. The analysis revealed several key findings: 1) social sustainability practices are adopted at varying rates; 2) twelve practices, primarily concerning fundamental human rights and labor ethics, are uniformly employed by both domestic and international firms; and 3) international firms are more likely than their domestic counterparts to regularly implement the other 20 social sustainability practices. These findings develop new knowledge on the implementation of social sustainability practices and advance the understanding of how firm origin influences the adoption of these practices. Additionally, the findings and their implications provide valuable guidance for policymakers and project leaders looking to incorporate social sustainability practices into their operational strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000334/pdfft?md5=da3acc678507d2aff63d02c6d8bd9345&pid=1-s2.0-S2666721524000334-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social sustainability in action: An explorative study of practices in construction project management\",\"authors\":\"Hamdi Bashir ,&nbsp;Rana Musa ,&nbsp;Hassan Ahmed Al Zarooni ,&nbsp;Udechukwu Ojiako ,&nbsp;Salah Haridy ,&nbsp;Mohammad Shamsuzzaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The significance of recognizing social sustainability practices for the successful management of projects is increasingly acknowledged. However, to what extent these practices are actually implemented within project management has not been sufficiently addressed in the literature. To address this gap, an empirical study was conducted to investigate the usage of social sustainability practices and explore any disparities in their implementation between domestic and international construction firms in the United Arab Emirates. This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining interviews and a structured questionnaire. Through the interviews, 32 social sustainability practices were identified. Subsequently, a questionnaire was used to collect data from project managers representing 259 firms. The analysis revealed several key findings: 1) social sustainability practices are adopted at varying rates; 2) twelve practices, primarily concerning fundamental human rights and labor ethics, are uniformly employed by both domestic and international firms; and 3) international firms are more likely than their domestic counterparts to regularly implement the other 20 social sustainability practices. These findings develop new knowledge on the implementation of social sustainability practices and advance the understanding of how firm origin influences the adoption of these practices. Additionally, the findings and their implications provide valuable guidance for policymakers and project leaders looking to incorporate social sustainability practices into their operational strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Project Leadership and Society\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000334/pdfft?md5=da3acc678507d2aff63d02c6d8bd9345&pid=1-s2.0-S2666721524000334-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Project Leadership and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Project Leadership and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认识到社会可持续发展实践对于成功管理项目的重要性日益得到认可。然而,这些实践在项目管理中的实际实施程度如何,还没有在文献中得到充分讨论。为了填补这一空白,我们开展了一项实证研究,以调查社会可持续发展实践的使用情况,并探索阿拉伯联合酋长国国内和国际建筑公司在实施这些实践方面的差异。这项研究采用了混合方法,将访谈和结构化问卷相结合。通过访谈,确定了 32 项社会可持续发展实践。随后,使用调查问卷收集了代表 259 家公司的项目经理的数据。分析揭示了几个主要发现1) 社会可持续发展实践的采用率各不相同;2) 有 12 项实践,主要涉及基本人权和劳工道德,被国内和国际企业统一采用;3) 国际企业比国内企业更有可能定期实施其他 20 项社会可持续发展实践。这些研究结果为社会可持续发展实践的实施提供了新的知识,并加深了人们对企业起源如何影响这些实践的采用的理解。此外,这些发现及其影响还为那些希望将社会可持续发展实践纳入其运营战略的政策制定者和项目负责人提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social sustainability in action: An explorative study of practices in construction project management

The significance of recognizing social sustainability practices for the successful management of projects is increasingly acknowledged. However, to what extent these practices are actually implemented within project management has not been sufficiently addressed in the literature. To address this gap, an empirical study was conducted to investigate the usage of social sustainability practices and explore any disparities in their implementation between domestic and international construction firms in the United Arab Emirates. This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining interviews and a structured questionnaire. Through the interviews, 32 social sustainability practices were identified. Subsequently, a questionnaire was used to collect data from project managers representing 259 firms. The analysis revealed several key findings: 1) social sustainability practices are adopted at varying rates; 2) twelve practices, primarily concerning fundamental human rights and labor ethics, are uniformly employed by both domestic and international firms; and 3) international firms are more likely than their domestic counterparts to regularly implement the other 20 social sustainability practices. These findings develop new knowledge on the implementation of social sustainability practices and advance the understanding of how firm origin influences the adoption of these practices. Additionally, the findings and their implications provide valuable guidance for policymakers and project leaders looking to incorporate social sustainability practices into their operational strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信