圆柱形钢筒仓中玉米粒的压力测量以及与不同国际标准的比较

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
{"title":"圆柱形钢筒仓中玉米粒的压力测量以及与不同国际标准的比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jspr.2024.102391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Flat bottom cylindrical silos are employed worldwide to store granular products of high commercial value. However, many gaps still remain in relation to pressure estimation and structural failures still occur. Moreover, there are few full-scale experimental stations in the world to facilitate advances in this line of research. Therefore, in this work, pressures were evaluated in a metallic cylindrical pilot silo that allows geometry adaptations. The pressures were analyzed for two slenderness ratios (2 and 3, respectively) with a flat bottom, using maize, a free-flowing product, as the stored product. The pressures were analyzed during loading and discharge conditions. The experimental results were compared with those recommended by means of the current standards EN 1991–4 and ANSI/ASAE S433.1 and the theory of Jenike et al. (1973). The results obtained show that the discharge pressures for the H/D ratio equal to 2 may exceed those obtained by the calculation method proposed by ANSI/ASAE S433.1, showing that the coefficients used in the standard are not sufficient to promote safety in projects of this configuration. Among the analyzed standards, EN 1991–4:2006 best fitted the experimental discharge pressures for the H/D ratio equal to 3. However, the theory of Jenike et al. (1973) presented theoretical values closer to the experimental ones in all analyzed depths. It is clear that further experimental studies are still needed to understand the underlying physical phenomena and the relationships between the pressures, silo geometry and flow pattern of the stored material.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stored Products Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressures measurements of maize grain in cylindrical steel silos and comparison with different international standards\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jspr.2024.102391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Flat bottom cylindrical silos are employed worldwide to store granular products of high commercial value. However, many gaps still remain in relation to pressure estimation and structural failures still occur. Moreover, there are few full-scale experimental stations in the world to facilitate advances in this line of research. Therefore, in this work, pressures were evaluated in a metallic cylindrical pilot silo that allows geometry adaptations. The pressures were analyzed for two slenderness ratios (2 and 3, respectively) with a flat bottom, using maize, a free-flowing product, as the stored product. The pressures were analyzed during loading and discharge conditions. The experimental results were compared with those recommended by means of the current standards EN 1991–4 and ANSI/ASAE S433.1 and the theory of Jenike et al. (1973). The results obtained show that the discharge pressures for the H/D ratio equal to 2 may exceed those obtained by the calculation method proposed by ANSI/ASAE S433.1, showing that the coefficients used in the standard are not sufficient to promote safety in projects of this configuration. Among the analyzed standards, EN 1991–4:2006 best fitted the experimental discharge pressures for the H/D ratio equal to 3. However, the theory of Jenike et al. (1973) presented theoretical values closer to the experimental ones in all analyzed depths. It is clear that further experimental studies are still needed to understand the underlying physical phenomena and the relationships between the pressures, silo geometry and flow pattern of the stored material.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stored Products Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stored Products Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022474X24001486\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stored Products Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022474X24001486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全世界都在使用平底圆筒形筒仓来储存具有高商业价值的颗粒状产品。然而,在压力估算方面仍存在许多差距,结构故障仍时有发生。此外,世界上很少有完整规模的实验站来促进这方面的研究进展。因此,在这项工作中,对允许几何形状调整的金属圆柱形试验筒仓进行了压力评估。以玉米(一种自由流动的产品)作为储存产品,对两种细长比(分别为 2 和 3)的平底压力进行了分析。在加载和卸载条件下对压力进行了分析。实验结果与现行标准 EN 1991-4 和 ANSI/ASAE S433.1 推荐的结果以及 Jenike 等人(1973 年)的理论进行了比较。结果表明,当 H/D 比率等于 2 时,排出压力可能会超过 ANSI/ASAE S433.1 提出的计算方法,这表明标准中使用的系数不足以提高这种结构的项目的安全性。在所分析的标准中,EN 1991-4:2006 最符合 H/D 比等于 3 时的实验排出压力。然而,Jenike 等人(1973 年)的理论在所有分析深度中提出的理论值更接近实验值。显然,要了解潜在的物理现象以及压力、筒仓几何形状和储存材料流动模式之间的关系,还需要进一步的实验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pressures measurements of maize grain in cylindrical steel silos and comparison with different international standards

Pressures measurements of maize grain in cylindrical steel silos and comparison with different international standards

Flat bottom cylindrical silos are employed worldwide to store granular products of high commercial value. However, many gaps still remain in relation to pressure estimation and structural failures still occur. Moreover, there are few full-scale experimental stations in the world to facilitate advances in this line of research. Therefore, in this work, pressures were evaluated in a metallic cylindrical pilot silo that allows geometry adaptations. The pressures were analyzed for two slenderness ratios (2 and 3, respectively) with a flat bottom, using maize, a free-flowing product, as the stored product. The pressures were analyzed during loading and discharge conditions. The experimental results were compared with those recommended by means of the current standards EN 1991–4 and ANSI/ASAE S433.1 and the theory of Jenike et al. (1973). The results obtained show that the discharge pressures for the H/D ratio equal to 2 may exceed those obtained by the calculation method proposed by ANSI/ASAE S433.1, showing that the coefficients used in the standard are not sufficient to promote safety in projects of this configuration. Among the analyzed standards, EN 1991–4:2006 best fitted the experimental discharge pressures for the H/D ratio equal to 3. However, the theory of Jenike et al. (1973) presented theoretical values closer to the experimental ones in all analyzed depths. It is clear that further experimental studies are still needed to understand the underlying physical phenomena and the relationships between the pressures, silo geometry and flow pattern of the stored material.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
18.50%
发文量
112
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stored Products Research provides an international medium for the publication of both reviews and original results from laboratory and field studies on the preservation and safety of stored products, notably food stocks, covering storage-related problems from the producer through the supply chain to the consumer. Stored products are characterised by having relatively low moisture content and include raw and semi-processed foods, animal feedstuffs, and a range of other durable items, including materials such as clothing or museum artefacts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信